Which is exactly what I said: 'The ones that actually do determine how you treat people obviously do.'
Which is why I gave you a hypothetical question....I included things like skin color, hair color, eye color, height, physical fitness, tone of voice , accent, etc.
These are all things that can have unconscious biases associated with them. It's also part of why the way some people use the term "white privilege" as if it's the one answer to every situation is wrong.
For example...
Standing tall pays off, study finds
The taller a person is, the more likely they get promoted on average....the more money they make on average.
The obvious question this leads to in relation to ideas about "white privilege" would be....
All other things being equal, who is more likely to be promoted? An above average height black man or a below average height white man? If someone has to decide who to promote and they're aware of both of these biases....which one of these is more important to consider, height or skin color? If the short white man isn't chosen....is he right to assume it's because he's short? If the tall black man isn't chosen....is he right to assume that it's because he's black?
Once you realize that all of these biases are a factor all of the time....any concentrated effort to address any one of them (at the exclusion of all others) is entirely self serving. Short people want to eliminate short bias, ugly people want to eliminate beauty bias, fat people want to eliminate fat bias, and so on and so on....
So the second question is why are we focusing almost entirely on racial biases? Why not focus on female bias since it has the largest group?
Women-are-wonderful effect - Wikipedia
The answer, I've found, is most easily discernible by looking at the narrative and who is selling it and who is buying it. The left wants votes. The left tells racial minorities that nothing they do is responsible for their lot in life....they're just victims of white people who are unconsciously racist against them (or who have created magically racist systems that don't even require individual racism). Why sell such a narrative? Well obviously it's appealing to hear that your failures are all someone else's fault....but also, because the laws are now fair....it's hard to come up with a valid reason why they should vote for Democratic Party Members (I would normally say Democrats but there's some weird rules about that word).
Why aren't you responding to what I write?
Because despite my extraordinary patience in answering your many many questions no matter how long it took....you deliberately avoid answering any of mine.
Instead of just saying "I have no way of knowing what unconscious biases a person is subject to....obviously no one does if even the person with the biases doesn't know".....you gave me some bizarre hypothetical scenario about how you would teach unconscious biases (in a very biased way) to a bunch of children and then you called it CRT.
I have constantly said that confirmation bias causes problems and...'if it does lead to problems then I'd ask if anyone had any solutions to combat them'. We need to tackle the problems that bias causes.
Of course it causes problems! In all of human history the only way to practically avoid confirmation bias is through the scientific method.
That's not a very practical method for every day interaction though....so confirmation bias is less a "problem" and more a "fact of life".
The simple way of saying this is "life isn't fair"....but it isn't fair for anyone, and that is fair in it's own way.
