I am vaccinated and have vaccinated my kids on time every time, I am not a random antivaxxer, but I do hold reservations about the mRNA vaccines.
What are those reservations?
I also hold reservations about how vaccines have been politicised. Eg how Russian and Chinese vaccines were viewed in comparison to American and British. We know there have been long standing political divisions and I see how those are still being held up even in this vaccine situation.
So you don't trust the vaccine because it has been politicized? I don't see how that's rational. Everything is and has been politicized to some extent and we till accept many things in spite of that.
I don't know the Chinese vaccine but I know the Russian vaccine is what's provided in Armenia and it's showing to be less effective than the American vaccines (which is why any of my relatives who have been able to come to the US have chosen to get vaccinated here instead). But how is that "politicized"???
To be honest that makes me weary.
I think you mean wary, but I don't know, perhaps you do mean weary, in which case I have to wonder if your weariness is making you wary or not.
If I was to get one, it will probably be the Chinese one as it used old tried and tested ways, which my children nor I have ever reacted to.
Do you have a source for "the Chinese one" having used "old tried and test ways"?
Yes there are strange things that happen, but even this article is partisan. There are people who have been vaccinated and died from covid. Why do they not talk about those too.
There are people who receive treatment for other illnesses and die anyway. Even people who have been vaccinated for HPV can still get cancer from that virus.
So, since there are no perfect vaccines, medicines, treatments, etc. then it's just foolish to seek medical attention for anything, right? It seems that the logic you're presenting here is that since nothing's perfect why bother with any of the options - just risk whatever the disease does to you instead, it's the same risk.
This article was put to make people come to the conclusion that, 'oh, these non vaccinated cooks are dying.' but provax people are also dying. Why does yahoo not report on that too.
Anyway.
I don't know where it mentions cooks - as far as I can see his vocation (or anyone's) is not presented. But this article doesn't present a viewpoint, it's just the facts of the story.
But it's interesting that your interpretation of it is that "these non-vaccinated [peope] are dying" just based on the facts of the story. It indicates to me that you know what's going on with the vaccinations and the people who take them vs. the people who reject them.
As for why doesn't yahoo report on the nonvacx people who are dying, they do. Those are different stories. Why doesn't yahoo report on the people who go to the hospital for treatment for heart attacks, kidney failure, cancer, gunshot wounds, injuries from car accidents, being bitten by animals, etc. etc. and even though they got medical attention they die anyway??? Well, they do report on those when there's a story on it.
The real question is why do you or anyone think that the fact that medical treatment of any sort is worthless if it's not 100% effective, especially since you already (presumably) know that there is no medical treatment that is actually 100% effective??? How does that make sense? Does that mean you go don't get medical treatment for anything ever at all??
You said earlier you get your kids vaccinated. Are those vaccines 100% safe and effective?? If so, which ones are they, because I have never heard of a vaccine that's 100% safe and effective, so what are these vaccines?
And if you got them vaccines that are not 100% safe and effective then why do you risk their safety with those and not with the Covid vaccines?? The logic doesn't follow.