John 14:1-3 "I will com again" - post-trib, pre-mill, full Rapture, visible

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,277
10,578
Georgia
✟908,230.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The abomination of desolation is a future event THE prophetic event that Jesus told us to watch for and gave instructions for.
so no it's not referring to something that took place in the past, not when Jesus referred to it as a future event and would shortly precede His second coming.
so you have a future time when there will be a temple and sacrifices, that are interrupted by the abomination of desolation.

it is both.

In Matt 24 the disciples ask for three things
1. When will these things be (speaking of Christ's statement about the temple destruction)
2. What will be the signs of your coming
3. And of the end of the age.

Matt 23:3 Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?”

The abomination of desolation was a sign to Christians at the time of the destruction of Jerusalem - and not one Christian perished in that event. And it is also a sign for Christians living at the end of time - when they see that sign - they too will know to flee as did the Christians who left Jerusalem before it was destroyed.

==================

But this thread is about the fact that the rapture event described in Matt 24 is the same one Christ describes in John 14:1-3 as "I will come again and RECEIVE you to Myself" and is the same one we see in 1 Thess 4:13-18
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,446
2,318
43
Helena
✟206,064.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
it is both.

In Matt 24 the disciples ask for three things
1. When will these things be (speaking of Christ's statement about the temple destruction)
2. What will be the signs of your coming
3. And of the end of the age.

Matt 23:3 Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?”

The abomination of desolation was a sign to Christians at the time of the destruction of Jerusalem - and not one Christian perished in that event. And it is also a sign for Christians living at the end of time - when they see that sign - they too will know to flee as did the Christians who left Jerusalem before it was destroyed.

==================

But this thread is about the fact that the rapture event described in Matt 24 is the same one Christ describes in John 14:1-3 as "I will come again and RECEIVE you to Myself" and is the same one we see in 1 Thess 4:13-18

I was never disputing that the rapture is at Jesus' second coming. I only dispute that Jesus' second coming is Revelation 19, at the end of the wrath of God.
The Second coming is not just a 1 and done single day event. it is a series of events, and it starts with Revelation 6:12-17 (shown again in Revelation 14:14-20), before the wrath of God. Revelation 19 is another event within that series of events. Rev 6 and 14 has Jesus in the clouds. Revelation 19 has Him touching down on the ground.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: keras
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,394
2,496
MI
✟308,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I believe it can be dual fulfillment but I believe that there will be a future temple where the abomination of desolation will take place. The 70AD destruction was a type fulfillment in the same way Antiochus Epiphanes IV was a type fulfillment of the antichrist (which is why many preterists claim that Daniel was referring to him, discounting that Jesus was treating it as a future event which says no, Antiochus Epiphanes was not the primary fulfillment of Daniel's prophecies)
I don't believe in dual fulfillment. Who exactly do you think will build this future temple and what other scriptures do you believe refer to it?
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,394
2,496
MI
✟308,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I was never disputing that the rapture is at Jesus' second coming. I only dispute that Jesus' second coming is Revelation 19, at the end of the wrath of God.
Yet Revelation 19 describes Him descending from heaven. But, that's not His second coming? :rolleyes:

The Second coming is not just a 1 and done single day event.
Yes, it is. Scripture repeatedly gives that indication. It talks about Him coming from heaven and then gathering His people to Himself and destroying His enemies. How long would that need to take? Why would it need to take more than a single day?

it is a series of events, and it starts with Revelation 6:12-17 (shown again in Revelation 14:14-20), before the wrath of God. Revelation 19 is another event within that series of events. Rev 6 and 14 has Jesus in the clouds. Revelation 19 has Him touching down on the ground.
Your view just baffles me. You can see that Revelation 6:12-17 and Revelation 14:14-20 are parallel and speak of the same event, but for some reason you can't see that Revelation 19 describes that same event. Where does Revelation 19 say anything about Him touching on the ground? It doesn't.
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,446
2,318
43
Helena
✟206,064.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
I don't believe in dual fulfillment. Who exactly do you think will build this future temple and what other scriptures do you believe refer to it?

Type fulfillments are all throughout the bible. There are connections between Exodus and Revelation such as the wrath of God poured out in stages of supernatural disasters.
as to who will build the temple? It'll be Jewish Israelites, they currently have the plans, material, and money to build it, all they need is political permission.
as for the scripture? Really? Every mention of the Abomination of Desolation refers to the Antichrist sitting in the temple and most also include the antichrist ending sacrifices.

Daniel 8 particularly verses 11-14 and before you say that was about the past only, consider Gabriel telling Daniel multiple times that this was an end times prophecy.

Daniel 8:17
17 So he came near where I stood: and when he came, I was afraid, and fell upon my face: but he said unto me, Understand, O son of man: for at the time of the end shall be the vision.
Daniel 8:19
19 And he said, Behold, I will make thee know what shall be in the last end of the indignation: for at the time appointed the end shall be.
The Alexandrian Empire was not the end of the world obviously, so it may have been a type fulfillment but not the primary fulfillment.

But that passage mentions the temple (sanctuary).
so does Daniel 11:31

Daniel 9:27 and Daniel 12:11 mention the ending of sacrifices, which the first 2 passages also mention, making them all the same event that is being referred to.
Jesus told us to understand and watch for this event in Matthew 24, and no that was not AD70 even though it may have been a type fulfillment because worse Tribulation has happened since then, and Jesus said that The Great Tribulation that occurs after the Abomination of Desolation will be worse than anything the world has ever seen and it'd never be equaled in the future. (Matthew 24:15-22)

and Paul also wrote about this event in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-4
1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

and then Revelation 11:1-2
1 And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.
2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.

before you spiritualize don't do it, you don't measure a human heart with a rod, and the human heart doesn't have an outer court of the gentiles.

If you don't think there will be a physical Jewish temple, you haven't been paying attention to world events.
Yes there will be a temple, yes it will be defiled by Antichrist, yes believers (yes "the Church") will be persecuted at an intensity that exceeds the Third Reich Holocaust (Matthew 24:21), and yes Jesus will come back before all of us are dead (Matthew 24:22), and take vengeance for us that have died for His name. (the Trumpets and Bowls of Revelation)
if you only see Jesus' return in Revelation 19 you're not looking, because comparing scripture to Scripture He's in Chapter 6, 11, 14, and 16 as well.
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,394
2,496
MI
✟308,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Type fulfillments are all throughout the bible. There are connections between Exodus and Revelation such as the wrath of God poured out in stages of supernatural disasters.
as to who will build the temple? It'll be Jewish Israelites, they currently have the plans, material, and money to build it, all they need is political permission.
as for the scripture? Really?
Yes, really. There's a reason why I asked for that, which I'll get to in a bit.

Every mention of the Abomination of Desolation refers to the Antichrist sitting in the temple and most also include the antichrist ending sacrifices.

Daniel 8 particularly verses 11-14 and before you say that was about the past only, consider Gabriel telling Daniel multiple times that this was an end times prophecy.

Daniel 8:17

Daniel 8:19

The Alexandrian Empire was not the end of the world obviously, so it may have been a type fulfillment but not the primary fulfillment.

But that passage mentions the temple (sanctuary).
so does Daniel 11:31

Daniel 9:27 and Daniel 12:11 mention the ending of sacrifices, which the first 2 passages also mention, making them all the same event that is being referred to.
Jesus told us to understand and watch for this event in Matthew 24, and no that was not AD70 even though it may have been a type fulfillment because worse Tribulation has happened since then and Jesus said that The Great Tribulation that occurs after the Abomination of Desolation will be worse than anything the world has ever seen and it'd never be equaled in the future. (Matthew 24:15-22)
You're missing the context. He was talking specifically about tribulation in Jerusalem itself. Nothing worse has happened in Jerusalem since what happened there in 70 AD. Think about it. If He was talking about a tribulation worse than anything that's ever happened anywhere, how can anything be worse than the flood in Noah's day which killed all but 8 people in the world? It can't. So, that can't be what He meant.

and Paul also wrote about this event in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-4


and then Revelation 11:1-2
This was the reason I asked that question regarding which scriptures refer to the temple you're talking about. I wanted to see if you would reference 2 Thess 2:1-4 and/or Revelation 11:1-2 or not. It's not surprising that you did.

But, there's a serious problem with what you're saying here. You're saying it will be "Jewish Israelites" who will build the temple. But, 2 Thess 2:1-4 and Revelation 11:1-2 refer to "the temple of God". No temple that unbelieving Jewish Israelites build could be considered the temple of God. A temple can only be called the temple of God if it's ordained by God Himself. A temple built by unbelieving "Jewish Israelites" would not be ordained by God and would never be considered the temple of God. This a fatal flaw in your view that you can't get around, in my opinion.

before you spiritualize don't do it,
You can't seriously be trying to tell me what to do? You're trying to tell me to interpret a highly symbolic/spiritual book literally. No, I'm not going to do that.

you don't measure a human heart with a rod, and the human heart doesn't have an outer court of the gentiles.
You're missing the figurative language there. Where is your discernment? Why do you look at everything in such a carnal way? Have you never read this:

1 Cor 2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. 13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. 14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

What kind of approach are you using to understand Revelation 11? It sure looks like you're just using "man's wisdom" here instead of relying on the Holy Spirit for discernment. Man's wisdom would say that any mention of a temple surely must be referring to a physical temple. Yet, we know that scripture refers to a temple in other ways such as to Christ's body, believer's bodies or to the collective body of believers as a whole, which is what Revelation 11:1-2 is about. Why do you not take other scripture which refers to the temple of God into account and instead want to insist that it's talking about a physical temple?

If you don't think there will be a physical Jewish temple, you haven't been paying attention to world events.
I didn't say I don't think there will be a Jewish temple. I honestly don't care if there will be one because if there is one built, it won't be the temple of God. It would just be a Jewish temple that God couldn't care less about because He didn't ordain it.

Yes there will be a temple, yes it will be defiled by Antichrist, yes believers (yes "the Church") will be persecuted at an intensity that exceeds the Third Reich Holocaust (Matthew 24:21), and yes Jesus will come back before all of us are dead (Matthew 24:22), and take vengeance for us that have died for His name. (the Trumpets and Bowls of Revelation)
I disagree with all of that. You have to resort to this dual fulfillment belief in order to deny that Matthew 24:15-22 is all about what happened in Jerusalem in 70 AD.

if you only see Jesus' return in Revelation 19 you're not looking, because comparing scripture to Scripture He's in Chapter 6, 11, 14, and 16 as well.
Did I say otherwise? Are you really reading what I'm saying carefully? Yes, all of those refer to His return. They are parallel accounts of the day of His return. You try to stretch it out into a longer period of time than one day, but that makes no sense. Why would He take His time gathering His believers to Himself and destroying His enemies once He descends from heaven? There would be no reason for Him to do that.
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,664
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟292,846.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
A temple can only be called the temple of God if it's ordained by God Himself. A temple built by unbelieving "Jewish Israelites" would not be ordained by God and would never be considered the temple of God. This a fatal flaw in your view that you can't get around, in my opinion.
The new Temple will be built by the Christian Israelites. People from every tribe, race, nation and language. The rightful occupiers of all of the holy Land. All as described by Ezekiel 40 to 48 and confirmed by many other prophesies. Believe it, or remain in the dark.
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,446
2,318
43
Helena
✟206,064.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Yes, really. There's a reason why I asked for that, which I'll get to in a bit.

You're missing the context. He was talking specifically about tribulation in Jerusalem itself. Nothing worse has happened in Jerusalem since what happened there in 70 AD. Think about it. If He was talking about a tribulation worse than anything that's ever happened anywhere, how can anything be worse than the flood in Noah's day which killed all but 8 people in the world? It can't. So, that can't be what He meant.

This was the reason I asked that question regarding which scriptures refer to the temple you're talking about. I wanted to see if you would reference 2 Thess 2:1-4 and/or Revelation 11:1-2 or not. It's not surprising that you did.

But, there's a serious problem with what you're saying here. You're saying it will be "Jewish Israelites" who will build the temple. But, 2 Thess 2:1-4 and Revelation 11:1-2 refer to "the temple of God". No temple that unbelieving Jewish Israelites build could be considered the temple of God. A temple can only be called the temple of God if it's ordained by God Himself. A temple built by unbelieving "Jewish Israelites" would not be ordained by God and would never be considered the temple of God. This a fatal flaw in your view that you can't get around, in my opinion.

You can't seriously be trying to tell me what to do? You're trying to tell me to interpret a highly symbolic/spiritual book literally. No, I'm not going to do that.

You're missing the figurative language there. Where is your discernment? Why do you look at everything in such a carnal way? Have you never read this:

1 Cor 2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. 13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. 14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

What kind of approach are you using to understand Revelation 11? It sure looks like you're just using "man's wisdom" here instead of relying on the Holy Spirit for discernment. Man's wisdom would say that any mention of a temple surely must be referring to a physical temple. Yet, we know that scripture refers to a temple in other ways such as to Christ's body, believer's bodies or to the collective body of believers as a whole, which is what Revelation 11:1-2 is about. Why do you not take other scripture which refers to the temple of God into account and instead want to insist that it's talking about a physical temple?

I didn't say I don't think there will be a Jewish temple. I honestly don't care if there will be one because if there is one built, it won't be the temple of God. It would just be a Jewish temple that God couldn't care less about because He didn't ordain it.

I disagree with all of that. You have to resort to this dual fulfillment belief in order to deny that Matthew 24:15-22 is all about what happened in Jerusalem in 70 AD.

Did I say otherwise? Are you really reading what I'm saying carefully? Yes, all of those refer to His return. They are parallel accounts of the day of His return. You try to stretch it out into a longer period of time than one day, but that makes no sense. Why would He take His time gathering His believers to Himself and destroying His enemies once He descends from heaven? There would be no reason for Him to do that.

The difference in your parallel accounts is that you break it into no chronology. placing the trumpets before the 6th seal despite none of the trumpets being given until the 7th seal.
You don't tell the difference between Tribulation and the Wrath of God. even when Revelation spells it out.

and no, you're not measuring a human heart with a rod. In no way is that figurative, symbols in Revelation are explained as they're presented.
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,394
2,496
MI
✟308,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The new Temple will be built by the Christian Israelites. People from every tribe, race, nation and language. The rightful occupiers of all of the holy Land. All as described by Ezekiel 40 to 48 and confirmed by many other prophesies. Believe it, or remain in the dark.
I don't believe you. I believe the scripture. Your interpretation contradicts what Hebrews 8-10 says about Christ doing away with animal sacrifices forever because of His "once for all" sacrifice. If you want to offend Christ by believing that animal sacrifices will be reinstated, that's your choice.
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,446
2,318
43
Helena
✟206,064.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Yet Revelation 19 describes Him descending from heaven. But, that's not His second coming? :rolleyes:

Yes, it is. Scripture repeatedly gives that indication. It talks about Him coming from heaven and then gathering His people to Himself and destroying His enemies. How long would that need to take? Why would it need to take more than a single day?

Your view just baffles me. You can see that Revelation 6:12-17 and Revelation 14:14-20 are parallel and speak of the same event, but for some reason you can't see that Revelation 19 describes that same event. Where does Revelation 19 say anything about Him touching on the ground? It doesn't.

His first coming was not 1 single event it was a series for events taking place over more than 30 years.
the second coming is also not 1 single event but a series of events taking place over years.
Isaiah 34:8 and Isaiah 63:4 both use day and year interchangeably. It is not meant to be taken as 1 24 hour period.
why you are hyperliteral on that is beyond me when scripture states that it is not 1 literal 24 hour day.
"the day" and "the hour" are figurative language, for all your talk about not grasping figurative language you don't grasp that.
the 5th trumpet by itself takes 5 months
5
months
and that happens after the 6th seal which is the return of Christ.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,394
2,496
MI
✟308,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The difference in your parallel accounts is that you break it into no chronology. placing the trumpets before the 6th seal despite none of the trumpets being given until the 7th seal.
I don't know what you're talking about. Nowhere does it say that the trumpets sound after the 7th seal is opened. You just assume that because the seven trumpets are written about after the seven seals.

You don't tell the difference between Tribulation and the Wrath of God. even when Revelation spells it out.
What are you talking about? Do you think I'm an idiot? Of course I know the difference. Why are you saying this?

and no, you're not measuring a human heart with a rod. In no way is that figurative, symbols in Revelation are explained as they're presented.
Oh, really? So, you think that's the case every time symbols are used? So, tell me exactly what the beast represents as well as the beast's seven heads and ten horns. According to you, those symbols are explained, so I can't wait for you to tell me exactly what they represent.

And how about the two witnesses? I guess it says exactly who or what they are as well? So, please tell me who or what are the two witnesses?

Revelation 2:9 I know your afflictions and your poverty—yet you are rich! I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

Jesus doesn't explain exactly what the "synagogue of Satan" is, so does that mean I should assume He was talking about a literal "synagogue of Satan" that people attend?

How about the woman/harlot who rides the beast. Also known as Babylon. I assume you can tell me exactly what the woman/Babylon represents as well?
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,394
2,496
MI
✟308,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
His first coming was not 1 single event it was a series for events taking place over more than 30 years.
Show me the scripture which compares His first coming to His second coming in this way and then maybe I'll give this point some credibility.

the second coming is also not 1 single event but a series of events taking place over years.
Isaiah 34:8 and Isaiah 63:4 both use day and year interchangeably. It is not meant to be taken as 1 24 hour period.
why you are hyperliteral on that is beyond me when scripture states that it is not 1 literal 24 hour day.
It's beyond you that Jesus could have His people gathered to Him and destroy His enemies in one 24 hour day? Really? When scripture talks about His second coming it talks about His people being gathered to Him and Him destroying His enemies when He comes (see 1 Thess 4:14-5:6, 2 Thess 1:7-10, 2 Peter 3:3-13, Rev 19:11-21, etc.). And then the judgment occurs (Matt 25:31-46). There's no basis for adding a bunch of other events as being part of His second coming.
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,664
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟292,846.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
I don't believe you. I believe the scripture. Your interpretation contradicts what Hebrews 8-10 says about Christ doing away with animal sacrifices forever because of His "once for all" sacrifice. If you want to offend Christ by believing that animal sacrifices will be reinstated, that's your choice.
Quite right; believe the Bible prophesies.
Which plainly tell us there will be a new Temple and offerings to God will be made in it. Isaiah 56:1-8, Ezekiel 20:40-41, Daniel 9:27, +

What is an 'offense to Christ', is a failure to read and take note of all of the Prophesies.
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,446
2,318
43
Helena
✟206,064.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
I don't know what you're talking about. Nowhere does it say that the trumpets sound after the 7th seal is opened. You just assume that because the seven trumpets are written about after the seven seals.

Because of the language used in the book.
Revelation 7:1-3 just after Jesus appears after the 6th seal and people on the earth declare that the great day of wrath has come.
And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.
2 And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of the living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea,
3 Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads.
The wrath of God cannot begin yet, because they need to seal the servants of God first. This is between the 6th and 7th seals.
Now we jump ahead past the scene in heaven showing the raptured saints to Revelation 8:1
1 And when he had opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven about the space of half an hour.
2 And I saw the seven angels which stood before God; and to them were given seven trumpets.
Not until the 7th seal was opened are the Angels that are to deliver God's wrath given permission to harm the earth, the sea, and the trees. The first 3 trumpet judgements target the earth, trees, and sea.
Your view has the result of the 7th seal just being a nothingburger. Just silence.

What are you talking about? Do you think I'm an idiot? Of course I know the difference. Why are you saying this?

Because you claim the trumpets happen before the second coming, and while not you personally, other people with your position have called the trumpets "tribulation" rather than the wrath of the lamb or wrath of God. All so they can make the claim that the wrath of God is only 1 24 hour day at the end of the 70th week. Are you going to say that's not your position? Because you do hold to the literal 24 hour wrath of God at the end of the 70th week, even though the 5th trumpet is part of the wrath of God and is 5 months long.

Oh, really? So, you think that's the case every time symbols are used? So, tell me exactly what the beast represents as well as the beast's seven heads and ten horns. According to you, those symbols are explained, so I can't wait for you to tell me exactly what they represent.

And how about the two witnesses? I guess it says exactly who or what they are as well? So, please tell me who or what are the two witnesses?

Revelation 2:9 I know your afflictions and your poverty—yet you are rich! I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

Jesus doesn't explain exactly what the "synagogue of Satan" is, so does that mean I should assume He was talking about a literal "synagogue of Satan" that people attend?

How about the woman/harlot who rides the beast. Also known as Babylon. I assume you can tell me exactly what the woman/Babylon represents as well?

The two witnesses are explained in Zechariah 4. They are 2 annointed ones who stand next to the Lord of the whole Earth
You know, thinking about this in particular I realize that while I liked to lean towards it being Elijah and Enoch because neither died...
it is Elijah and Moses, because they are the ones who stood by the Lord of the whole Earth on the Mount of Transfiguration.

as for the Synagogue of Satan, Jesus explained what they were right there. They claim they are Jews and are not. That is, ethnic Jews, who do not worship God. Satan, the god of this world, is their god.
Therefore, they are the synagogue of Satan.

as for the woman and the beast?
How do you see those as uninterpretable symbols when the Angel explains each part of that vision?

Revelation 17:18
18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.
It's a city, from which world religion and government stem from. As to which city that actually is, that remains yet to be seen. People of course have theories.

The book is called Revelation, not obscure everything behind vague impressions.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,316
568
56
Mount Morris
✟124,857.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Yet Revelation 19 describes Him descending from heaven. But, that's not His second coming? :rolleyes:

Yes, it is. Scripture repeatedly gives that indication. It talks about Him coming from heaven and then gathering His people to Himself and destroying His enemies. How long would that need to take? Why would it need to take more than a single day?

Your view just baffles me. You can see that Revelation 6:12-17 and Revelation 14:14-20 are parallel and speak of the same event, but for some reason you can't see that Revelation 19 describes that same event. Where does Revelation 19 say anything about Him touching on the ground? It doesn't.
The Second Coming is to the Mount of Olives. Revelation 19 is coming down at Armageddon 60 miles north of Jerusalem and the Mount of Olives. Armageddon is after the 42 months. The Second Coming is before the Trumpets and Thunders. The Trumpets and Thunders are before the 7th Trumpet. The 7th Trumpet starts and in the middle of the week, Satan is given 42 months, and the celebration of the 7th Trumpet is put on hold, until after the 42 months. To clear up the mess of the 42 months, Christ starts at Megiddo and kills all humanity between there and Jerusalem. The FP and beast are cast into the Lake of Fire. Satan's angels are either sent there as well, or put back in the pit. Satan is bound in the pit. His time in the Lake of Fire is not for another 1000 years.

If the 7th Trumpet is not interrupted, there will not be the split in the midst of the week of days in Daniel 9:27. The 7th Trumpet is the end of the 70th week. If that particular prophecy is not fulfilled, the only one crying or punished is Satan. The prophecy depends on what happens when Jesus Christ confirms the Atonement Covenant. How many souls are left in the Lamb's book of life that need to be harvested. Those left will be harvested by way of having their heads cut off instead of receiving the mark. Any after that who remain will be killed at Armageddon. Then the 70th week is wrapped up. If all souls are harvested and none left for Satan, then the 7th Trumpet last for the week of days. Then the winepress of Revelation 14. Satan is still bound. Bound in chapter 20, even if no FP and image ever happen.

Christ is still on earth either way. The Second Coming is Christ coming as Prince to finish the 70th week of Daniel. If Christ is not on earth, He would be the only being in heaven. All other beings came to earth or are in Paradise between heaven and earth. God on the throne whose base is on earth is now present and seen by all, even the Face. The angels are all on the earth. Christ brings them at the Second Coming. Yes there is coming and going constantly between heaven and earth. But no where does it claim Jesus retires to heaven and leaves the earth in the midst of all this event. At the most, during the 42 months He is on Mount Zion. The location yet unknown. But He returns at Armageddon back to Jerusalem. Surely the temple has not moved from Jerusalem to Megiddo. Only all the armies of the earth have gathered there to attempt a defense of Jerusalem when Jesus returns as planned at the end of the 42 months.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,394
2,496
MI
✟308,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Quite right; believe the Bible prophesies.
Which plainly tell us there will be a new Temple and offerings to God will be made in it. Isaiah 56:1-8, Ezekiel 20:40-41, Daniel 9:27, +

What is an 'offense to Christ', is a failure to read and take note of all of the Prophesies.
You have failed to read the book of Hebrews which your interpretation of those prophecies contradicts. If you're comfortable contradicting New Testament scripture with your interpretations of Old Testament scripture, that's on you. You should instead try again and interpret them in such a way that doesn't contradict New Testament scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,394
2,496
MI
✟308,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Second Coming is to the Mount of Olives. Revelation 19 is coming down at Armageddon 60 miles north of Jerusalem and the Mount of Olives. Armageddon is after the 42 months. The Second Coming is before the Trumpets and Thunders. The Trumpets and Thunders are before the 7th Trumpet. The 7th Trumpet starts and in the middle of the week, Satan is given 42 months, and the celebration of the 7th Trumpet is put on hold, until after the 42 months. To clear up the mess of the 42 months, Christ starts at Megiddo and kills all humanity between there and Jerusalem. The FP and beast are cast into the Lake of Fire. Satan's angels are either sent there as well, or put back in the pit. Satan is bound in the pit. His time in the Lake of Fire is not for another 1000 years.

If the 7th Trumpet is not interrupted, there will not be the split in the midst of the week of days in Daniel 9:27. The 7th Trumpet is the end of the 70th week. If that particular prophecy is not fulfilled, the only one crying or punished is Satan. The prophecy depends on what happens when Jesus Christ confirms the Atonement Covenant. How many souls are left in the Lamb's book of life that need to be harvested. Those left will be harvested by way of having their heads cut off instead of receiving the mark. Any after that who remain will be killed at Armageddon. Then the 70th week is wrapped up. If all souls are harvested and none left for Satan, then the 7th Trumpet last for the week of days. Then the winepress of Revelation 14. Satan is still bound. Bound in chapter 20, even if no FP and image ever happen.

Christ is still on earth either way. The Second Coming is Christ coming as Prince to finish the 70th week of Daniel. If Christ is not on earth, He would be the only being in heaven. All other beings came to earth or are in Paradise between heaven and earth. God on the throne whose base is on earth is now present and seen by all, even the Face. The angels are all on the earth. Christ brings them at the Second Coming. Yes there is coming and going constantly between heaven and earth. But no where does it claim Jesus retires to heaven and leaves the earth in the midst of all this event. At the most, during the 42 months He is on Mount Zion. The location yet unknown. But He returns at Armageddon back to Jerusalem. Surely the temple has not moved from Jerusalem to Megiddo. Only all the armies of the earth have gathered there to attempt a defense of Jerusalem when Jesus returns as planned at the end of the 42 months.
Thanks for taking the time to respond, but I can't make any sense of what you're saying. For example, you say Christ's second coming will be before the trumpets? No, He will come at the last trumpet (1 Cor 15:50-54). No more prophetic trumpets will sound after His second coming. Your timing of events is completely out of whack. And that is because you unwisely choose to interpret the whole book of Revelation chronologically from beginning to end instead of recognizing the parallel sections in it.
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,394
2,496
MI
✟308,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Not until the 7th seal was opened are the Angels that are to deliver God's wrath given permission to harm the earth, the sea, and the trees. The first 3 trumpet judgements target the earth, trees, and sea.
Your view has the result of the 7th seal just being a nothingburger. Just silence.
Don't tell me what my view of the 7th seal is without asking me first. I believe the reason that there is silence in heaven with the 7th seal is because, Christ, His angels, and the souls of the dead in Christ will have departed heaven at that point. The souls of the dead in Christ united with their changed, immortal bodies and meet Christ in the air at that point. And then Christ takes His vengeance on His enemies and destroys them all (Matt 24:37-39, 2 Thess 1:7-10, 2 Peter 3:3-13, Rev 19:18).

Because you claim the trumpets happen before the second coming, and while not you personally, other people with your position have called the trumpets "tribulation" rather than the wrath of the lamb or wrath of God. All so they can make the claim that the wrath of God is only 1 24 hour day at the end of the 70th week. Are you going to say that's not your position? Because you do hold to the literal 24 hour wrath of God at the end of the 70th week, even though the 5th trumpet is part of the wrath of God and is 5 months long.
Man, you're all over the place. For one thing, I believe the 70th week was fulfilled long ago. Your understanding of the 70th week is flawed. There is no basis whatsoever for seeing a gap in the 70 week prophecy.

My position is that Christ doesn't return until His final wrath comes down on the day He returns. That can be easily seen from passages like Matthew 24:37-39, 2 Thess 1:7-10, 2 Peter 3:3-13 and Revelation 19:11-21. Is that what I just said here hard to understand?

What we call "the rapture" will not happen until He returns. He is only descending from heaven once and it will be at the last trumpet (1 Cor 15:50-54). I see the last trumpet and seventh trumpet as being the same. Let me know if there's anything confusing about what I'm saying. You make everything convoluted, but it's not meant to be that way.

The two witnesses are explained in Zechariah 4. They are 2 annointed ones who stand next to the Lord of the whole Earth
You know, thinking about this in particular I realize that while I liked to lean towards it being Elijah and Enoch because neither died...
it is Elijah and Moses, because they are the ones who stood by the Lord of the whole Earth on the Mount of Transfiguration.
Wait a minute. Hold on now. You were talking about the symbols being explained in the book of Revelation itself. Where does the book of Revelation indicate that the two witnesses refer to Elijah and Moses? It doesn't. Why are you not acknowledging that not every symbol in Revelation is explained as you tried to claim?

as for the Synagogue of Satan, Jesus explained what they were right there. They claim they are Jews and are not. That is, ethnic Jews, who do not worship God. Satan, the god of this world, is their god.
Therefore, they are the synagogue of Satan.

as for the woman and the beast?
How do you see those as uninterpretable symbols when the Angel explains each part of that vision?

Revelation 17:18

It's a city, from which world religion and government stem from. As to which city that actually is, that remains yet to be seen. People of course have theories.
If it's explained then why can't you tell me exactly what city it is? You are embarrassing yourself here but not acknowledging my point which is that not all the symbols in the book of Revelation are spelled out for us as to what exactly they represent. The same is true regarding the temple of God in Revelation 11:1-2. It's not a physical temple. We can discern that similarly to how we discern the identity of other symbolic entities in the book of Revelation that are specifically identified.

The book is called Revelation, not obscure everything behind vague impressions.
So, tell me exactly who the beast is and exactly what the seven heads and ten horns represent. You apparently have all the answers about what all the symbols in Revelation mean and yet you can't tell me these things.
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,446
2,318
43
Helena
✟206,064.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Don't tell me what my view of the 7th seal is without asking me first. I believe the reason that there is silence in heaven with the 7th seal is because, Christ, His angels, and the souls of the dead in Christ will have departed heaven at that point. The souls of the dead in Christ united with their changed, immortal bodies and meet Christ in the air at that point. And then Christ takes His vengeance on His enemies and destroys them all (Matt 24:37-39, 2 Thess 1:7-10, 2 Peter 3:3-13, Rev 19:18).

Man, you're all over the place. For one thing, I believe the 70th week was fulfilled long ago. Your understanding of the 70th week is flawed. There is no basis whatsoever for seeing a gap in the 70 week prophecy.
There is because we obviously have not seen the end of the world the final antichrist, the abomination of desolation, etc, all of it is 70th week of Daniel references. Until the fullness of the gentiles comes.

My position is that Christ doesn't return until His final wrath comes down on the day He returns. That can be easily seen from passages like Matthew 24:37-39, 2 Thess 1:7-10, 2 Peter 3:3-13 and Revelation 19:11-21. Is that what I just said here hard to understand?

The part where you don't recognize that God's wrath lasts longer than a single day.
5 months for 1 trumpet.

What we call "the rapture" will not happen until He returns. He is only descending from heaven once and it will be at the last trumpet (1 Cor 15:50-54). I see the last trumpet and seventh trumpet as being the same. Let me know if there's anything confusing about what I'm saying. You make everything convoluted, but it's not meant to be that way.
Your confusion comes from not recognizing that trumpets have different calls. The 7th trumpet judgement is not a call to convocation, it's a pronouncement of judgement. The last trump Paul is referring to is a call to convocation. It's a different trumpet blast for an entirely different purpose.
Realize that Revelation was not written until decades after Paul had been martyred, and Paul was communicating to people decades before Revelation was written. Paul wouldn't rely on people reading a book that wouldn't be written for 40 years to explain his letter to a church.
They are not the same thing.

Wait a minute. Hold on now. You were talking about the symbols being explained in the book of Revelation itself. Where does the book of Revelation indicate that the two witnesses refer to Elijah and Moses? It doesn't. Why are you not acknowledging that not every symbol in Revelation is explained as you tried to claim?
Because it is explained
Revelation 11:3-4
3 And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.
4 These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth.
It is a direct reference to Zechariah 4.
11 Then answered I, and said unto him, What are these two olive trees upon the right side of the candlestick and upon the left side thereof?
12 And I answered again, and said unto him, What be these two olive branches which through the two golden pipes empty the golden oil out of themselves?
13 And he answered me and said, Knowest thou not what these be? And I said, No, my lord.
14 Then said he, These are the two anointed ones, that stand by the Lord of the whole earth.

So it's two annointed ones who stood by Jesus.
The two annointed ones who stood by Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration were Elijah and Moses.
Revelation 11 continues to say that they have the power to call fire (Elijah) and call down plagues on the earth like turning the water into blood (Moses)
Malachi 4:5 also says Elijah will be sent before the day of the Lord.
now yes, Jesus said John the Baptist came in Elijah's spirit, so there is also that possibility that people will be sent in the spirit of Elijah and Moses rather than physically being Elijah and Moses.
Either way. The two witnesses are Elijah and Moses I'm convinced.

If it's explained then why can't you tell me exactly what city it is? You are embarrassing yourself here but not acknowledging my point which is that not all the symbols in the book of Revelation are spelled out for us as to what exactly they represent. The same is true regarding the temple of God in Revelation 11:1-2. It's not a physical temple. We can discern that similarly to how we discern the identity of other symbolic entities in the book of Revelation that are specifically identified.
The temple isn't a symbol because it's not explained to be a symbol. it's a temple. a temple that can be measured with a rod.
The City, if you want to interpret it literally, is Babylon. Yes I know Babylon is ruins now, but if God can make Israel a nation in a day, He can also raise up Babylon again. One thing is certain is that the US is no longer the dominant power in the world at the time of the end. we're under judgement and will probably collapse and be irrelevant.

So, tell me exactly who the beast is and exactly what the seven heads and ten horns represent. You apparently have all the answers about what all the symbols in Revelation mean and yet you can't tell me these things.
One thing first. When the symbol of the Beast was given it's not just in reference to a person, but an empire. An empire is treated synonymously with its Emperor. They don't say Ramses II, they just say Pharaoh. They don't just say Tiberius, they say Caesar. There have been well more than 8 gentile kings that have controlled Israel. But there have been 7 world empires that have had direct control over Israel. The Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks (the 5 that are fallen by John's time), Rome (the 1 that was current in John's time), and the Islamic Caliphate/Ottoman Empire (the one that was not yet in John's time) (Revelation 17:10). The 8th empire, the Antichrist's Empire is "of the seven", I take it to mean it's going to consist of the same land area as the 7 previous, and could either be a revived Roman Empire or Revived Ottoman Empire, or a combination "of the seven". Erdogan of Turkey certainly has plans to reestablish the Ottoman Empire after the "expiration" of the Treaty of Lausanne in 2023. He's been involved in Libya, Syria, Iraq, places that have been destabilized that could be taken over. Couldn't say Erdogan's the antichrist, but could be a predecessor.

But the angel explains that the 7 heads are 7 mountains and the woman is a city. A city that sits on seven mountains. It's not some mystery where you have to wonder what the heads represent. The angel says 7 mountains. There's a city famous for 7 mountains.
I just choose not to spell it out because there's a denomination that gets very upset about that.

Sometimes you just have to believe the bible means what it says, rather than analyzing everything to mean something else. In Zechariah it said that Messiah would be sold for 30 pieces of silver, cast at the potter. In the Gospel of Matthew we learn Judas betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver, and when he killed himself those 30 pieces of silver were used to buy the plot of land from a potter. They were cast at the potter.
You don't have to spiritually analyze what the 30 pieces of silver meant or who the potter represented or anything like... because of literal fulfillment.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: keras
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,664
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟292,846.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
You have failed to read the book of Hebrews which your interpretation of those prophecies contradicts. If you're comfortable contradicting New Testament scripture with your interpretations of Old Testament scripture, that's on you. You should instead try again and interpret them in such a way that doesn't contradict New Testament scripture.
There is no contradiction, as Christians remain God's Spiritual Temple, when a physical one in built.
Which it will be; as it is clearly prophesied to.

You are actually telling God He isn't allowed to have a Temple!
I find your beliefs rather strange. Jamdoc gives a good rebuttal to some of them above.
 
Upvote 0