Our rights are ultimately a gift from God, not from government, as is averred in our mission statement, the Declaration of Independence.
Nope we have no rights, other than those granted to us by accident of birth, or the actions of those that have gone before us. You can appeal to an imaginary 'natural law' such as 'all men are created equal' if you like, but it is not a 'natural law' that is found in 'nature', 'all lobsters are not created equal' - some have bigger claws.
There is no Bill of Rights in the bible, only a Bill of Restrictions.."Though shalt not..." this is not the same.
The 'advancing tyranny' that you speak of is the 'woke' tyranny of people making their own 'declarations of independence' and drafting their own 'bills of rights' and it is not so much a rejection of the 'mission statement' it is rather the logical extension of it.
You can argue that as 'bearers of the image of God' all human life is sacred and as such of preeminent value (I would agree), which brings me to your response on the relative values of worship services and human lives.
I've heard this proposal before in defense of the lockdowns, but I'm not sure how you would mensurate the equation driving this exchange, seeing that the lockdown has significant human costs, and also seeing that all the lockdowns, social distancing, and mask-wearing has been of very dubious statistical benefit.
It is not the disproportionality of lockdowns(they can be disproportionate), or even their effectiveness at saving lives(their effectiveness is undeniable) or that people might commit suicide if they don't go to church, they might.
What is being contested is the supposed preeminence of the religious right of assembly.
So my question is, which is more valuable to you, your right to exercise your religious freedom to meet in public, or your neighbour's right to not die in a Covid ward? if it's a trade off, then what loss of life is an acceptable one?