In answer to the question posed, yes. The Bible expressly forbids women to teach or hold positions of Biblical authority over men.
This means she can't pastor a church, but she can teach women and children. She can even discuss biblical questions/issues with men (much like we do online) she just can't be authoritative over him.
For authority, a learned male Pastor should be referred to or consulted.
However, "teaching" in the modern context--standing in front of a room reading from a lesson text--doesn't confer personal authority over anyone. That's very much different from Paul's day, in which "teaching" explicitly meant men were
discipled to the teacher and completely under his personal authority the way Jesus' disciples were completely under His authority. We just don't do that anymore (at least not in the West).
I made the distinction of "personal" authority for a reason. Let's say, for instance, that a woman is in charge of a church's children's class. If a man enters and hangs around for no reason (not having any children in the class), the woman most likely has delegated authority to direct him to leave. But that's as far as her authority over the man goes. Her authority is delegated from someone who has real authority to impose a
penalty on the man (probably only an elder or the pastor). To do anything more than insist that he leave, she has to "escalate" the matter to someone with the delegated authority to use force (such as someone from the church security ministry) or the personal authority to levy penalties.
And that would be just as true for a woman leading the adult Sunday School class. She does not have the authority to create her own doctrine--her lessons are those approved by the elders and pastors (or even higher levels). She doesn't have the personal authority to impose any kinds of penalties on anyone in her class--she can only report classroom behavior to those who do have that authority.
In my last active duty military role, I supervised a training center. My instructors were all enlisted troops who where junior in rank to the officers who were their students. Technically, they had zero authority over their students in the military hierarchy. They could only report their students' activities to the commander over all of them. That's not what "teacher" meant to Paul.
That's not a relationship Paul would have recognized as a teacher/disciple relationship. He might have called that "expounding" the doctrine of a teacher, such as Aquila and Priscilla did with Apollos. But Apollos was never their
disciple, and they were never his
teachers as Paul would have understood it.
Paul did not allow men to be discipled to women because the concept inherently involved authority in his understanding...and he also directed that women were to be discipled to older women. He didn't have any co-ed discipling at all.