Socialist countries fall.
I would say Venezuela has been failing. But I have been told there are socialist countries like Norway and Sweden who have everyone working, for less hours a week, but in less fancy houses . . . something like this.
And we are seeing how well democracy is working now . . . the unity, the happiness. It might depend on who gets their hands on the democracy or the socialism.
What has passed for truth in the last 3 months has gone nuts, and people justify hatred, emnity, and a call for violence because of these unfounded statements.
Satan is a liar and violent. So, yes the two can go together.
May be, then, we can say, where there is violence, there has been lying ¿
?
The fact is more of "they" didn't want him as a leader, than "they" who did. He lost the popular vote twice. More of "they" voted against him the second time in response to his 1st term. You don't have to make it more complicated or conspiratory than that.
Well, to me it was clear how if he lost the first popular vote and then lost popularity, of course the second popular vote for him would be less.
Also, Donald had four years to get power to control votes. His administration put a lot of federal judges into courts, plus he got a Supreme Court majority. And ones of his own justices did not back him up about the election being stolen. He had four years to work on the FBI; the FBI did not confirm his claims. The military did not use its power to enforce him, not did the country's police . . . though he had made his claims that he was about the police and they wanted him.
He had all that time to arrange support to enforce his claims. But the military did not join him, and his appointed majority Supreme Court justices did not buy what he was doing.
They who were under Donald themselves did not support him.
And the Republican Party put him in office. If they want to have a Republican president, they need to function to get someone who is qualified, and not blame others. So, they helped themselves to lose.
On the other hand, the Democrats might have donated the election to Donald, by running Hillary and doing that convention corruption thing. Yes, they can be corrupt. But it seems to me how certain Republicans functioned corruptly and/or incompetently by not presenting a qualified candidate and not standing up to a wrong one.
A leader takes the lead in what is needed, including good example, then. Blaming is not leading, I would say.
Donald claimed to be a leader, but did he take the lead of good example???? If not, he helped to donate the election to Joe.