Dominion Voting Systems Demands Sidney Powell Retract Election Fraud Statements

[NightHawkeye]

Since this is an election machine it is reasonable to assume that there are all sorts of safeguards against fraud incorporated into it.

Correct.

However, those safeguards were wantonly violated in a few select areas of the country. The matter is not even disputed now. The only question is about how much fraud occurred, not whether there was fraud.

Glad we could clear that up. Thanks for finally cutting to the chase. See how easy that was.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Correct.

However, those safeguards were wantonly violated in a few select areas of the country. The matter is not even disputed now. The only question is about how much fraud occurred, not whether there was fraud.

Glad we could clear that up. Thanks for finally cutting to the chase. See how easy that was.

And you have evidence of this? Claiming that something is not disputed is not evidence. Find a reliable source when making claims. You can vet your sources by using such resources as:

Media Bias/Fact Check - Search and Learn the Bias of News Media

Or you could use others. This site lists a good number:

LibGuides: Fake News: Fact-checking resources

EDIT: By the way the LibGuides in the title refers to Library Guides.

 

[mmksparbud]

What do you know? You’re from Nevada. Texas is the smart state.

But it was Nevada that person said were thousands of dead voters voted. So ridiculous!! I guess Texas wasn't smart enough to have their dead vote for Trump. Well, that shows how much Trump was not wanted---even the dead rose up against him!!

 

[mmksparbud]

Correct.

However, those safeguards were wantonly violated in a few select areas of the country. The matter is not even disputed now. The only question is about how much fraud occurred, not whether there was fraud.

Glad we could clear that up. Thanks for finally cutting to the chase. See how easy that was.

It has been highly disputed and in court---which your lawyers lost.

 

[cow451]

But it was Nevada that person said were thousands of dead voters voted. So ridiculous!! I guess Texas wasn't smart enough to have their dead vote for Trump. Well, that shows how much Trump was not wanted---even the dead rose up against him!!

That reminds me... when does the next Fear the Walking Dead season begin?

 

[mmksparbud]

No.

The belief, which you and others here, are expressing that votes can't be quickly and accurately hand counted is ridiculous. Now, in THEORY, machines can provide a more accurate count ... but the current machine systems have obviously not provided that.

Actually, it has proved that they are. It's only Trumpers that do not think so because their little dictator can not stand to loose and refuses to admit reality. He has about a dozen lawsuits waiting on Jan 21--some for rape of then 13 year old girls.

 

[mmksparbud]

That reminds me... when does the next Fear the Walking Dead season begin?

Apparently, here it never ends!!

 

[NightHawkeye]

Claiming that something is not disputed is not evidence.

It has been highly disputed and in court---which your lawyers lost.

It appears that we have moved on to the next nit to pick.

Glad to see we're no longer disputing that the Dominion Voting Systems machines have the capability of manipulating votes in large quantities ... at the whim of the operator. Some even claim hackers can easily manipulate votes on these machines as well.

 

[MIDutch]

Glad to see we're no longer disputing that the Dominion Voting Systems machines have the capability of manipulating votes in large quantities ....

Because it's pretty obvious that that never happened.

Only trump supporters want to beat that dead horse over and over and over and over ... and over again.

 

[mmksparbud]

It appears that we have moved on to the next nit to pick.

Glad to see we're no longer disputing that the Dominion Voting Systems machines have the capability of manipulating votes in large quantities ... at the whim of the operator. Some even claim hackers can easily manipulate votes on these machines as well.

All they have to do is prove it.

 

[NightHawkeye]

All they have to do is prove it.

You mean like with evidence obtained through court subpoenas? Curiously, that is happening even now.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It appears that we have moved on to the next nit to pick.

Glad to see we're no longer disputing that the Dominion Voting Systems machines have the capability of manipulating votes in large quantities ... at the whim of the operator. Some even claim hackers can easily manipulate votes on these machines as well.

This is not a nit. And no, no one made such a concession. Your failure was pointed out to you but just as an exercise I showed how you are wrong even if your claim about the machines was true. You do realize that quoting out of context dishonestly to support an argument is a form of lying I hope. You quote mined me. That was not proper.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You mean like with evidence obtained through court subpoenas? Curiously, that is happening even now.

Yeah right. We have been hearing that song for almost six weeks now. Still no evidence.

 

[NightHawkeye]

This is not a nit. And no, no one made such a concession. Your failure was pointed out to you but just as an exercise I showed how you are wrong even if your claim about the machines was true. You do realize that quoting out of context dishonestly to support an argument is a form of lying I hope. You quote mined me. That was not proper.

Funny how not agreeing with you is always "wrong", even though you haven't and can't actually prove anything factual. Persist with your semantic arguments as you see fit, just bear in mind that even as you persist in requiring absolute proof from me for my assertions ... that's a two-way street.

Build a house of cards if you must.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Funny how not agreeing with you is always "wrong", even though you haven't and can't actually prove anything factual. Persist with your semantic arguments as you see fit, just bear in mind that even as you persist in requiring absolute proof from me for my assertions ... that's a two-way street.

Build a house of cards if you must.

Not always. But the sad fact is that you are once again guilty of what you are accusing others of. You have no evidence. You cannot support your claims. And they are almost always rather foolish. Don't get mad when you are corrected. Use it as a learning experience. You are projecting again. The burden of proof has always been upon you due to the claims that you make and you have never properly supported them. All I need to do is to point out your failures. Meanwhile I have supported claims when I have made them and they needed support. Nor have I ever used wacko and biased sources to do so.

 

[SimplyMe]

So glad you asked. The Dominion manual good enough?

THE COMPLETE DOMINION ELECTION SYSTEM MANUAL

Here's an example:

​

Notice the lines about "PURGING RESULTS" and "TRANSFERRING RESULTS".

​

Maybe I'm not smart enough, but I don't see the issue. It would seem obvious, once the machine has finished the counts, that you'd want to transfer the results the voting machine tabulated to other election computers, such as reporting that machines results so they can be combined with the count from the other machines.

As for purging results, it seems like that would need to be done to prepare the machine for the next election. After all, those counts should remain in memory until "purged," as you don't want a power outage at the precinct to "blank" all the voting machines.

Again, maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like these are two necessary functions for a voting machine.

 

[whatbogsends]

It appears that we have moved on to the next nit to pick.

Glad to see we're no longer disputing that the Dominion Voting Systems machines have the capability of manipulating votes in large quantities ... at the whim of the operator. Some even claim hackers can easily manipulate votes on these machines as well.

Of course, if there were votes manipulated by Dominion machines, hand recounts would have found them. We all know that the hand recounts matched the computer totals and there's absolutely no evidence that votes were switched.

Even Rudy Giuliani thought there were no votes switched by machines. When asked why he didn't ask for a hand recount in Michigan, he said "it would just be counting the same fraudulent ballots", which means that he knows no votes were switched by machines.

That something might be able to happen isn't evidence that it did. Six weeks after the election, and so far the best argument you have that fraud happened is that it might have (and even then, the claim is questionable). It's garbage, just like everything else you've been spewing for the last 6 weeks.

 

[Mayzoo]

So glad you asked. The Dominion manual good enough?

THE COMPLETE DOMINION ELECTION SYSTEM MANUAL

Here's an example:

​

Notice the lines about "PURGING RESULTS" and "TRANSFERRING RESULTS".

​

Rather than being able to purge past results, you would rather these be use once and throw away machines?

That is an expensive, and wasteful option to pursue.

 

[MIDutch]

Build a house of cards if you must.

Aren't there 56 cards in a deck?

trump has already lost more court cases than that, so ...

 

[essentialsaltes]

LINK

President Donald Trump's campaign legal team sent a memo to dozens of staffers Saturday instructing them to preserve all documents related to Dominion Voting Systems and Sidney Powell in anticipation of potential litigation by the company against the pro-Trump attorney.

"Please make sure that relevant personnel are aware that these records must be maintained," the memo states. "The files or boxes should be labeled, "DO NOT DESTROY WITHOUT PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GENERAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE."

Dominion Voting Systems did not immediately respond to CNN's request for comment on whether it imminently plans to take legal action against Powell.