Dominion vote switching physically impossible

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
7,968
2,886
Minnesota
✟208,027.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Once cast there is no way to trace a ballot back to a specific voter.

Is this the next legal strategy, challenge the practice of secret ballots?
You had Republican observers illegally blocked from properly observing
and you had rules put in place 60 days, 90 days before the election by Democrats, whether by an Attorney General or a Governor, in order to circumvent the law. The violations of law are numerous and of great severity and if the legal and legal-only votes cannot be verified it is only fair not to award the election to those who cheated.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Erik Nelson
Upvote 0

Aryeh Jay

Gone and hopefully forgotten.
Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
15,312
14,321
MI - Michigan
✟498,114.00
Country
United States
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Well, we can forget about it anyway. Sidney Powell concocted that conspiracy theory and Trump just fired her for it.

Draining the swamp! Another promises kept!
 
Upvote 0

A_Thinker

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Apr 23, 2004
11,911
9,064
Midwest
✟931,284.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You had Republican observers illegally blocked from properly observing
and you had rules put in place 60 days, 90 days before the election by Democrats, whether by an Attorney General or a Governor, in order to circumvent the law. The violations of law are numerous and of great severity and if the legal and legal-only votes cannot be verified it is only fair not to award the election to those who cheated.
Both parties always have a representative to observe and confirm the validity of the vote ...
 
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,793
✟229,457.00
Faith
Seeker
You had Republican observers illegally blocked from properly observing
and you had rules put in place 60 days, 90 days before the election by Democrats, whether by an Attorney General or a Governor, in order to circumvent the law.
Oh, really? Wow.

What rules? And who put them in place? Pray, tell.
 
Upvote 0

whatbogsends

Senior Veteran
Aug 29, 2003
10,370
8,314
Visit site
✟281,129.00
Faith
Atheist
That looks a lot like flaming or goading, it is also not a positive or respectful refection on Jesus, maybe an edit would be a good idea

Flaming is posting false claim after false claim like Erik Nelson has been doing.

You also appear to have misinterpreted at least some of Neogaia's comments. He wasn't commenting on Jesus in the least.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,319
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Really. Well let's take a sample of the ballots and ask the particular voters if they would be willing to verify that's who each really voted for. Let the Republicans pick the district.

Secret ballots? What secret ballots?
 
Upvote 0

whatbogsends

Senior Veteran
Aug 29, 2003
10,370
8,314
Visit site
✟281,129.00
Faith
Atheist
Claims for Philadelphia range from:
  • old fashioned ballot box stuffing:
  • "curing" (filling in) ballots with votes for Democratic candidates:
  • barring (all but a few) Republican observers from (anywhere near actual) vote recording:
  • electronic vote manipulation (of "ES&S" hardware running "Smartmatic" software uploading votes to "Scytl" databases overseas):

"All Roads Lead to Rome" (so to speak):
  • ES&S hardware uploads votes to "Clarity" database owned by "Scytl"
  • Dominion hardware uploads votes to "Democracy Suite" database owned by "Scytl"

Those corrupt Democrats just couldn't decide which way to cheat, so they did them all!

If they switched votes using machines, they wouldn't need to block poll watchers, cure ballots, or what have you.

You keep on throwing garbage at the wall, just trying to get any of it to stick.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
7,968
2,886
Minnesota
✟208,027.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Those corrupt Democrats just couldn't decide which way to cheat, so they did them all!

If they switched votes using machines, they wouldn't need to block poll watchers, cure ballots, or what have you.

You keep on throwing garbage at the wall, just trying to get any of it to stick.[/QUOTE
It was obvious something was up when the large Democrat cities in the swing states quit counting right at the point when, in a past election, the media would call the election for Trump. When the counts started coming in again they dramatically switched to Biden. The affidavits will show how much of it was done. We do know for sure that Republican observers were illegally prevented from properly observing at that time--absolutely outrageous. Their conduct has not been condemned at all by the Democrat leaders. As to the specifics of how the cheating took place the public will learn more once all of the affidavits are made public.
 
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
6,813
7,420
PA
✟317,269.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Really. Well let's take a sample of the ballots and ask the particular voters if they would be willing to verify that's who each really voted for. Let the Republicans pick the district.
They're supposed to do that before they hand the paper ballot to the poll worker. It's half the point of printing out a hard copy - the other half being the ability to compare electronic totals to the printouts and confirm that no one modified the data or forgot to upload the contents of a flash drive. Ballots are not able to be traced back to "particular voters" because one of the principles of voting in this country is that ballots are secret. Election databases will record that you voted, but who you voted for is never tied to your identity.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Kentonio

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2018
7,467
10,458
48
Lyon
✟266,564.00
Country
France
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Claims for Philadelphia range from:
  • old fashioned ballot box stuffing:
  • "curing" (filling in) ballots with votes for Democratic candidates:
  • barring (all but a few) Republican observers from (anywhere near actual) vote recording:
  • electronic vote manipulation (of "ES&S" hardware running "Smartmatic" software uploading votes to "Scytl" databases overseas):

"All Roads Lead to Rome" (so to speak):
  • ES&S hardware uploads votes to "Clarity" database owned by "Scytl"
  • Dominion hardware uploads votes to "Democracy Suite" database owned by "Scytl"

This right here is why you guys keep tumbling straight into conspiracy theory territory. You start off with a single claim, and then as that claim is pointed out to not make any sense, there has to be a new claim that explains away the discrepancies. Before long your claim has turned into a dozen claims, each as wild as the first.
 
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,368
15,457
✟1,099,338.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You had Republican observers illegally blocked from properly observing
That isn't true they were kept at the same distance Dems. and Indep. were. The Trump lawyers admitted in court that they were able to observe.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
7,968
2,886
Minnesota
✟208,027.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
That isn't true they were kept at the same distance Dems. and Indep. were. The Trump lawyers admitted in court that they were able to observe.
You are misinformed. The supposed "admission" was that observers were in the room--the press can be tricky. A real tell as to the truth is that Republicans were able to get a court order to get them within ten feet--but the sheriff's office wouldn't enforce it. Obviously they got the court order because they were further away than ten feet. I
This right here is why you guys keep tumbling straight into conspiracy theory territory. You start off with a single claim, and then as that claim is pointed out to not make any sense, there has to be a new claim that explains away the discrepancies. Before long your claim has turned into a dozen claims, each as wild as the first.
People have filed sworn affidavits, under penalty of perjury--that can get them five years in prison for making a false statement. What I've seen is quite matter of fact.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Erik Nelson
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,368
15,457
✟1,099,338.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The supposed "admission" was that observers were in the room--the press can be tricky. A real tell as to the truth is that Republicans were able to get a court order to get them within ten feet--but the sheriff's office wouldn't enforce it. Obviously they got the court order because they were further away than ten feet. I
The court order let all the observers within 6". They gained 4". They had agreed to obey the covid-19 rules. If they didn't want to do that they shouldn't have been there. They agreed to wear masks and not to touch the electors, ballots, computers, etc.

EDIT: adding sources
A Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court judge overturned a lower court ruling and ruled that election observers can stand “within six feet” of the vote counting process, after the Trump campaign had accused election officials of “hiding the ballot counting and processing from our Republican poll observers” by forcing them to stand further away.
PA Judge Rules In Favor Of Trump Campaign, Causing Philly To Pause Its Vote Count Temporarily

Judge reverses Philadelphia Court ruling, orders all campaign representatives can observe vote counting process from distance of 6 feet | wnep.com
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ArmenianJohn
Upvote 0

Aryeh Jay

Gone and hopefully forgotten.
Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
15,312
14,321
MI - Michigan
✟498,114.00
Country
United States
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
The US states say the election was conducted just fine...

The Democratic Controlled States? The States with oppressive Democrat Governors? The States that are AGAINST the current President? The States that WANT and NEED Joe Biden to win at any cost? Those States?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Erik Nelson
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Aryeh Jay

Gone and hopefully forgotten.
Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
15,312
14,321
MI - Michigan
✟498,114.00
Country
United States
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
The court order let all the observers within 6". They gained 4". They had agreed to obey the covid-19 rules. If they didn't want to do that they shouldn't have been there. They agreed to wear masks and not to touch the electors, ballots, computers, etc.

I just checked the United States Constitution, the Law of the land, and couldn’t find the Covid-19 clause.
 
Upvote 0

trunks2k

Contributor
Jan 26, 2004
11,369
3,520
41
✟270,241.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
EDIT: adding sources
A Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court judge overturned a lower court ruling and ruled that election observers can stand “within six feet” of the vote counting process, after the Trump campaign had accused election officials of “hiding the ballot counting and processing from our Republican poll observers” by forcing them to stand further away.
PA Judge Rules In Favor Of Trump Campaign, Causing Philly To Pause Its Vote Count Temporarily
IIRC, a higher court later overturned THAT, pointing out that the law does not specify distance the observers need to be at and local election officials can, generally, make the distance rules as they see fit. But by that point it was mostly moot since the counting was already mostly completed, but it keeps the "WE WEREN'T ALLOWED CLOSE ENOUGH" from being used as an argument in litigation to overturn ballots or whatever.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,319
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
The Democratic Controlled States? The States with oppressive Democrat Governors? The States that are AGAINST the current President? The States that WANT and NEED Joe Biden to win at any cost? Those States?

Yep... and the others, too... for good measure.
 
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,368
15,457
✟1,099,338.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
IIRC, a higher court later overturned THAT, pointing out that the law does not specify distance the observers need to be at and local election officials can, generally, make the distance rules as they see fit. But by that point it was mostly moot since the counting was already mostly completed, but it keeps the "WE WEREN'T ALLOWED CLOSE ENOUGH" from being used as an argument in litigation to overturn ballots or whatever.
I think that was the PA Supreme Court.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,368
15,457
✟1,099,338.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I just checked the United States Constitution, the Law of the land, and couldn’t find the Covid-19 clause.
The US Constitution doesn't comment on state election laws. Every state makes their own determinations about what they need to do.
 
Upvote 0