DOJ official confirms FBI 2019 criminal investigation into Hunter Biden still active

[NightHawkeye]

DOJ official confirms FBI 2019 criminal investigation into Hunter Biden, still active

A justice department official has confirmed to Sinclair Broadcast Group that the FBI opened up a criminal investigation into Hunter Biden and his associates back in 2019, focused on allegations of money-laundering and that the probe remains active.

Sinclair investigative reporter James Rosen has also spoken with a central witness in these allegations, which suggests that former vice president Joe Biden knew more than he has acknowledged about his son's overseas dealings.​

 

[seeking.IAM]

It's all just too reminiscent of the FBI and Hillary right before the last election. It would not surprise me if it comes to nothing after the election is over. It's tough to admit I don't much trust government to be honest about anything anymore.

 

[Triumvirate]

Shoot guess Hunter won't be president then

 

[Tanj]

It is pretty sad that they cannot even make this stick to Hunter, let alone his father.

 

[Tiberius Lee]

Do we know the justice department officials’ name ? if there was a report on CNN or MSNBC about Ivanka Trump from a anonymous “justice department official” , our in house Trump supporter right away discredit the report by saying “anonymous person doesn’t count”.

Any way , I didn’t vote for Hunter Biden! Nor i care about any DOJ say any thing about Hunter Biden. DOJ became a political agency under Trump.

 

[Fantine]

In the first place, Sinclair has a very unsavory reputation, buying up smaller stations to disseminate right wing propaganda while creating a monopoly.
In the second place, AG Barr doesn't start investigations for cause. He assists in the president's vendettas and ignored real scandals.
5 more days. May our national nightmare end.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Shoot guess Hunter won't be president then

Wait! Was I supposed to vote for HUNTER Biden? I think I voted for the wrong Biden then.

 

[Triumvirate]

Wait! Was I supposed to vote for HUNTER Biden? I think I voted for the wrong Biden then.

Me too, but I think I voted for Jim Biden instead

Joe Biden's brother Jim refuses to answer Fox News China questions | Daily Mail Online

His "crotchety old man who's tired of your guff and wants you to get off his darn lawn" energy is an inspiration to me

 

[Hans Blaster]

It's all just too reminiscent of the FBI and Hillary right before the last election. It would not surprise me if it comes to nothing after the election is over. It's tough to admit I don't much trust government to be honest about anything anymore.

Let me guess: NYFO FBI?

 

[essentialsaltes]

What DOJ official? Is this another anonymous sources thingy?

 

[Belk]

Wait. Is the FBI no longer part of the deep state? I need a score card or something.

 

[Triumvirate]

Wait. Is the FBI no longer part of the deep state? I need a score card or something.

Derp state

 

[KCfromNC]

Wait. Is the FBI no longer part of the deep state? I need a score card or something.

Only on days when polls are wrong. Or maybe the ones where polls are correct. It is really hard to keep it all straight.

 

[JohnDB]

Joe Biden himself has several allegations of sexual harrassment.

But the DOJ needs to find who has the evidence of the money laundering...so they can track who is going to use it for blackmail.

 

[DaisyDay]

staff edit.

You should know that Joe Biden has not been accused of touching women sexually (apart from the grifter Tara Reade). He is a touchy guy; I'm not someone who likes being touched by strangers, but I know the difference between a 'bad' touch and a benign touch.

staff edit

As reported by the scandel-ridden James Rosen

 

[KCfromNC]

Joe Biden himself has several allegations of sexual harrassment.

But the DOJ needs to find who has the evidence of the money laundering...so they can track who is going to use it for blackmail.

I love how we've completely jumped over the question of "is there actually any evidence of a crime". That tells me that this is a legitimate, evidence based analysis of the candidate rather than a political hit job.

 

[JohnDB]

I love how we've completely jumped over the question of "is there actually any evidence of a crime". That tells me that this is a legitimate, evidence based analysis of the candidate rather than a political hit job.

Just because you don't believe that the light at the end of the tunnel is an incoming train doesn't mean that it won't bulldoze you when it hits.

 

[Triumvirate]

I love how we've completely jumped over the question of "is there actually any evidence of a crime". That tells me that this is a legitimate, evidence based analysis of the candidate rather than a political hit job.

It's almost like the Tara Reade and Hunter Biden claims are being processed in the same manner. Gesticulate wildly in the direction of wrongdoing, provide no actual conclusive proof, get really shirty when asked for better evidence or at least to wait until it emerges - and to cap it off, ignore the multiple cases of Twitler doing wayyyyyyy worse with way stronger evidence.

 

[Arc F1]

You should know that Joe Biden has not been accused of touching women sexually (apart from the grifter Tara Reade). He is a touchy guy; I'm not someone who likes being touched by strangers, but I know the difference between a 'bad' touch and a benign touch.

As reported by the scandel-ridden James Rosen

My apologies. I know he hasn't been legally accused. Just my observations.

 

[KCfromNC]

Just because you don't believe that the light at the end of the tunnel is an incoming train doesn't mean that it won't bulldoze you when it hits.

Oh, well, I didn't know you were also going to bring empty platitudes into this. That certainly counters the fact that there's zero evidence to believe these stories about Biden. Why didn't you just say so at the start? I'm now convinced.