- Nov 21, 2008
- 51,298
- 10,590
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
BobRyan said: ↑
I am talking about real facts -- real events in real history with real people. The fact that God does something does not delete that something from real history or real nature. Nature itself is something 'God did'.
Yup and because of this you are arguing on a different topic.
science vs the Bible. Where the Bible is compatible with science fact.
So then Christ literally incarnate born as a real human in Bethlehem
and Lazarus raised from the dead in real life - seen in nature as alive.
..
But not scientific facts in regards to nature, and it's not to be taken literally
nonsense.
I am talking about real facts -- real events in real history with real people fully compatible with science fact.
The fact that God does something does not delete that something from real history or real nature. Nature itself is something 'God did'. And Bible facts are fully compatible with science fact.
Confirmed - incarnation is literally true.
Confirmed - resurrection of Lazarus is literally true and fully compatible with science fact - so then Pv=nRT remains true no matter that Lazarus is raised from the dead.
Electrolysis is still an observed feature in nature no matter that there is the incarnation of Christ.
7 day creation week does not stop salt from occurring in the form NaCl.. fully compatible with science fact.
The point remains.
Last edited:
Upvote
0