CNN’s Brian Stelter called out over 'tone-deaf' criticism of conservative media for questioning...

[Michie]

...Joe Biden’s mental health

From the article.
Stelter has called on media to delve into Trump's mental health

CNN’s Brian Stelter baffled media watchdogs on Sunday who now question if the liberal pundit has ever watched his own network.

During his “Reliable Sources” media show, Stelter criticized conservative pundits and talk radio hosts for speculating about presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden’s mental health and fitness for office, despite his own show having spent years doing the same thing to President Trump.

“At some point, don't Stelter’s bosses have to recognize what an absolute embarrassment he is to their network?” conservative strategist Chris Barron told Fox News. “Stelter spent weeks wildly spreading baseless conspiracy theories about Trump’s mental health and now he has the audacity to question others asking questions about Biden?”

Continued below.
CNN’s Brian Stelter called out over 'tone-deaf' criticism of conservative media for questioning Joe Biden’s mental health

 

[Halbhh]

We are perhaps going to replace someone that seems sometimes erratic and too often doing evil (to some) with someone that seems sometimes (to some) elderly/fading.

One could perhaps take a libertarian view that it doesn't matter much if the president is elderly/fading because the nation doesn't need a president to do a lot, and is better off if the president isn't ambitious.

Look at Ronald Reagan's 2nd term.... Elderly and fading isn't always so bad!

In that view (a classic libertarian view), elderly/fading is a lot better than sometimes erratic/sometimes evil, anyday.

Libertarians would prefer the president isn't the primary focus of attention, and isn't making the news everyday!

 

[Wolseley]

We are perhaps going to replace someone that seems sometimes erratic and too often doing evil (to some) with someone that seems sometimes (to some) elderly/fading.

One could perhaps take a libertarian view that it doesn't matter much if the president is elderly/fading because the nation doesn't need a president to do a lot, and is better off if the president isn't ambitious.

Look at Ronald Reagan's 2nd term.... Elderly and fading isn't always so bad!

In that view (a classic libertarian view), elderly/fading is a lot better than sometimes erratic/sometimes evil, anyday.

Libertarians would prefer the president isn't the primary focus of attention, and isn't making the news everyday!

I would only agree with this if Biden were offset by a Congress that was overwhelmingly Republican.

The Democrats' recent history is more than enough to prove that as a party, they are waaay too radically dangerous to entrust them with our liberties. At one time, the Democrats were a solid, American organization---back in the days of Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, and John Kennedy. But that was a long time ago, in a different country than the one we're living in now. Now, the party seems to be unequally split between incompetent, drunken vaudevillians and power-mad, anti-American ideologues who want to control the People in a manner so totalitarian that it makes Joe Stalin look like the Fairy Godmother.