- Nov 15, 2006
- 43,640
- 13,925
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
****Not about Trump - ****
In 2016 the Democratic Party presented "the best qualified" Candidate for the Presidency. She was very well qualified, backed by more than 1 Billion dollars in campaign funds, had the blessing of the DNC high command and the full endorsement of the former President. Yet she lost.
Many commentators (opposition), said that she would be a continuation of the Obama policies, some calling it his third term. That combined with an uprising in the general populace wanting a change from the same style politics as the former eight years rose steadily.
Some have ventured to say that the election was more a vote against Hillary and per politics, than it was for her opponent.
Here is the question I'd like to get some feedback from:
IF, please note 'if' - the election results were influenced by a large number of voters who were voting against the candidate and the administration policies, what do they think will happen when they run the former vice president, who was an architect to some of those very same policies? Would that not be a detriment? Isn't that a reason why the people supporting Bernie felt so strongly?
Are they making a mistake?
****Not about Trump - **** Can I please ask the mods to help keep this thread on subject.
In 2016 the Democratic Party presented "the best qualified" Candidate for the Presidency. She was very well qualified, backed by more than 1 Billion dollars in campaign funds, had the blessing of the DNC high command and the full endorsement of the former President. Yet she lost.
Many commentators (opposition), said that she would be a continuation of the Obama policies, some calling it his third term. That combined with an uprising in the general populace wanting a change from the same style politics as the former eight years rose steadily.
Some have ventured to say that the election was more a vote against Hillary and per politics, than it was for her opponent.
Here is the question I'd like to get some feedback from:
IF, please note 'if' - the election results were influenced by a large number of voters who were voting against the candidate and the administration policies, what do they think will happen when they run the former vice president, who was an architect to some of those very same policies? Would that not be a detriment? Isn't that a reason why the people supporting Bernie felt so strongly?
Are they making a mistake?
****Not about Trump - **** Can I please ask the mods to help keep this thread on subject.