4 other warming periods in the geologic record.

greatcloudlives

Active Member
Dec 28, 2019
347
39
63
Oregon City
✟26,155.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Each warming period being 1400 years apart from each other. The midevial warming period, the Roman warming period and two other Holocene maximums. Why were they all 1400 years apart from each other. This modern warming period should have been predicted.
 

greatcloudlives

Active Member
Dec 28, 2019
347
39
63
Oregon City
✟26,155.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Also why is there observed warming all across the solar system. Frozen gasesg melting as well as temperature Increase on every planet.

I forgot how to create a new link or I would post it on this thread. Please look it up yourself.
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
8,503
9,484
✟236,224.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Each warming period being 1400 years apart from each other. The midevial warming period, the Roman warming period and two other Holocene maximums. Why were they all 1400 years apart from each other. This modern warming period should have been predicted.
Citations or retraction. Your choice.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
10,592
5,732
Montreal, Quebec
✟248,004.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Each warming period being 1400 years apart from each other. The midevial warming period, the Roman warming period and two other Holocene maximums. Why were they all 1400 years apart from each other. This modern warming period should have been predicted.
Misleading - there is powerful evidence that the current warming is being fuelled by human activity. We could get into all sorts of technical debates - that neither of us are qualified to enter into - about this. But the bottom line is this: The experts, as contrasted with you and me, are in virtually unanimous agreement - the current problem is caused by us.
 
Upvote 0

greatcloudlives

Active Member
Dec 28, 2019
347
39
63
Oregon City
✟26,155.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
And I can tell you that complex issues which the majority agree with are often wrong and it takes some time to uncover the evidence.

For instance the very small area that CO2 operates on the heat wavelength cannot possibly account for the warming we are experiencing. Most of the heat radiation escapes into space.
The cycle of the Earth around the Sun would account for the time period of 1400 years between warmings.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
10,592
5,732
Montreal, Quebec
✟248,004.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
And I can tell you that complex issues which the majority agree with are often wrong and it takes some time to uncover the evidence.
Please give us some examples. But even if you can, it is, I suggest, absurd to deny the position of experts on an important matter simply because they might be mistaken.

Using your reasoning, I should take up smoking since the connection between cigarette smoke and cells becoming cancerous is complex, and the conclusion that smoking causes cancer "might be proven wrong when we have time to uncover the evidence."
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
10,592
5,732
Montreal, Quebec
✟248,004.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
For instance the very small area that CO2 operates on the heat wavelength cannot possibly account for the warming we are experiencing. Most of the heat radiation escapes into space.
Do you really think that, in this one sentence, you have discovered something that thousands of trained climate experts have overlooked? Stunning example of the Dunning-Kruger phenomenon.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Rocket surgeon
Mar 11, 2017
14,645
11,690
54
USA
✟293,945.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
And I can tell you that complex issues which the majority agree with are often wrong and it takes some time to uncover the evidence.

For instance the very small area that CO2 operates on the heat wavelength cannot possibly account for the warming we are experiencing. Most of the heat radiation escapes into space.
The cycle of the Earth around the Sun would account for the time period of 1400 years between warmings.

WHAT cycle of the Earth around the Sun has a 1400 year period? It ain't the orbit (1 year). It ain't the
Milankovitch cycles - Wikipedia

So what is it?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ophiolite
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
80
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,295.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Also why is there observed warming all across the solar system. Frozen gasesg melting as well as temperature Increase on every planet.

I forgot how to create a new link or I would post it on this thread. Please look it up yourself.

Ciitation please.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hans Blaster

Rocket surgeon
Mar 11, 2017
14,645
11,690
54
USA
✟293,945.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
And I can tell you that complex issues which the majority agree with are often wrong and it takes some time to uncover the evidence.

For instance the very small area that CO2 operates on the heat wavelength cannot possibly account for the warming we are experiencing. Most of the heat radiation escapes into space.
The cycle of the Earth around the Sun would account for the time period of 1400 years between warmings.

Do you feel warmer when you wear a hat?

(Response to assumed reply:) Really, but it only covers a small portion of your skin.
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
80
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,295.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Each warming period being 1400 years apart from each other. The midevial warming period, the Roman warming period and two other Holocene maximums. Why were they all 1400 years apart from each other. This modern warming period should have been predicted.

I can't speak to the other three but the medieval warming period was not global. It was restricted to the North Atlantic and may have been caused by a change in ocean currents.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Rocket surgeon
Mar 11, 2017
14,645
11,690
54
USA
✟293,945.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I will not make a retraction. However I have forgotten how to create a link.

Everything I said is in the book by Fred Singer "Global warming every 1500 years" look it up , or tell me how to create a link.

There is literally a "chain" icon in the tool bar when composing. Click on it and paste in your link.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Ophiolite
Upvote 0

Ricky M

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Apr 19, 2017
1,905
1,319
66
Los Angeles
✟130,544.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Each warming period being 1400 years apart from each other. The midevial warming period, the Roman warming period and two other Holocene maximums. Why were they all 1400 years apart from each other. This modern warming period should have been predicted.
Is it possible, and I'm sure you're going to think me crazy, that the current warming is due to both natural cycles AND man made pollution?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
8,503
9,484
✟236,224.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
I will not make a retraction. However I have forgotten how to create a link.
It is astounding that you are unable to figure out how to create a link, yet feel you are qualified to speak with authority on matters that are complex and understood by experts who have devoted their lives to their study. Such arrogance on your part would be amusing if it were not so dangerous.

Creating a link:
  • Open the internet page you wish to link to
  • Copy the page address
  • Return to forum and the Reply box you are using
  • Enter text you wish to use to describe the link
  • Select that text
  • Go to the function bar at the top of the Reply box
  • Click on the chain icon, seven icons from the left.
  • Paste the copied link into the box
  • Click insert
Job done.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,213
5,604
Erewhon
Visit site
✟923,105.00
Faith
Atheist
It is astounding that you are unable to figure out how to create a link, yet feel you are qualified to speak with authority on matters that are complex and understood by experts who have devoted their lives to their study. Such arrogance on your part would be amusing if it were not so dangerous.

Creating a link:
  • Open the internet page you wish to link to
  • Copy the page address
  • Return to forum and the Reply box you are using
  • Enter text you wish to use to describe the link
  • Select that text
  • Go to the function bar at the top of the Reply box
  • Click on the chain icon, seven icons from the left.
  • Paste the copied link into the box
  • Click insert
Job done.
Most of the time you can simply paste the link and the board software creates the link with readable text (probably by copying some meta-data for you.)


ETA:
For example: https://www.christianforums.com/forums/physical-life-sciences.408/ gets you Physical & Life Sciences
 
Last edited:
  • Useful
Reactions: Ophiolite
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
8,503
9,484
✟236,224.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
edberry.com the peer reviewied paper found here refutes that man is more important to the climate than nature.
How are you defining "peer reviewed paper"? In what way is the paper referenced in your link peer reviewed? In what journal was this paper published?
 
Upvote 0