doesn't mean that it isn't demon possession behavior...
Psychiatrist Admits Mental Illness Is Caused By Demonic Possession
Psychiatrist Admits Mental Illness Is Caused By Demonic Possession
tulc(will just leave this here)NewsPunch is a Los Angeles-based fake news website known for spreading conspiracy theories and political misinformation peddling fake news, mixed in with real news stories.[1] Originally named Your News Wire,[4][10][11] it was founded in 2014 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai and Sinclair Treadway.[2][5][12] In November 2018, it rebranded itself as NewsPunch, and began redirecting yournewswire.com traffic to newspunch.com.[10]
Well that's fine that you believe that, on the other hand this article is fake. Which was the point I was making.Despite the source of this article, I have believed that this is sometimes the case, for many years now.
Well that's fine that you believe that, on the other hand this article is fake. Which was the point I was making.
tulc(thought it was something that should be pointed out)
Yes a Psychiatrist friend of mine has concluded the same thing.
He has just given up on the profession and is in training for Christian counselling.
This has been clear to me for years, in fact another Psychiatrist asked me to pray for a client as she had reached the end of her resources.
It is tragic that the church has abdicated its responsibility to minister in this area.
i know that demons love possessing mental ill people
...and then there's this, too:
News Punch - Media Bias/Fact Check
A Wiki article alone is hardly authoritative. Perhaps a more objective, well researched and peer reviewed source would be preferable? My initial reaction would be to trust a Wiki article only slightly more than a source I never heard of before. Nonetheless I would always prefer a much more reliable source than Wiki to be convinced that some other source was a complete crackpot .
Authoritative? No, but a good place to start if you're interested in finding out about things. They usually have links and suggest other places to check out for more information on a subject.A Wiki article alone is hardly authoritative.
I posted the link because it was pretty clear the headline didn't actually reflect the content of the article. The way it's worded makes it sound like he's saying all mental illness is demonic/demons and that's not even sort of what the article is saying.Perhaps a more objective, well researched and peer reviewed source would be preferable? My initial reaction would be to trust a Wiki article only slightly more than a source I never heard of before. Nonetheless I would always prefer a much more reliable source than Wiki to be convinced that some other source was a complete crackpot .
I’ve helped clergy from multiple denominations and faiths to filter episodes of mental illness — which represent the overwhelming majority of cases — from, literally, the devil’s work
The article ought to be judged on its own merits, not smeared because of someone's doubts of the site. 98% of it was, in fact, simply lifted from a Washington Post article of the same day, with the other 2% being simple introduction. So if the article is bad, blame WaPo.
I found the article fair, balanced, and restrained. The quote above is typical of the author's professional objectivity. He's not saying all mental illness is direct demonization. But he's saying a small portion of it is.
.
It is tragic that the church has abdicated its responsibility to minister in this area.
It's right there on the linked article page.Would you post a link to the WaPo article?