- Aug 14, 2012
- 4,293
- 2,259
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
"liberal" means left-leaning, right. Why then does "woke" rose Twitter keep using "liberal" as a slur?
Leftists are quite far to the left of liberals. Leftists are socialists and communists. Liberals are capitalists. The Clintons, Obamas, Corporate Democrats, etc. Leftists, progressives, and liberals are not the same group."liberal" means left-leaning, right. Why then does "woke" rose Twitter keep using "liberal" as a slur?
Because it's in the nature of all revolutionaries to eat themselves.
Leftists are quite far to the left of liberals. Leftists are socialists and communists. Liberals are capitalists. The Clintons, Obamas, Corporate Democrats, etc. Leftists, progressives, and liberals are not the same group.
"liberal" means left-leaning, right. Why then does "woke" rose Twitter keep using "liberal" as a slur?
"liberal" means left-leaning, right.
Why then does "woke" rose Twitter keep using "liberal" as a slur?
Sure, and mean different things in different places.The definitions of these political categories are very vaguely and fluidly defined and categories overlap considerably. Moreover these categories shift with time.
Because it's in the nature of all revolutionaries to eat themselves.
I agree. I'm correct that your post made no sense.
First of all, "imploding" and "eating each other" are very different things. Have conservatives threatened to kill other conservatives the way Antifa says "liberals get the bullet too"?You made a statement. I showed my agreement by providing an example of your statement in order to demonstrate its validity.
Where's the problem? did the TEA Party implode so utterly that I'm the only one who even remembers them?
First of all, "imploding" and "eating each other" are very different things. Have conservatives threatened to kill other conservatives the way Antifa says "liberals get the bullet too"?
Second, did the tea party implode, or did the newness just wear off and the media stopped covering them, so we don't hear much about them?
If they had imploded, I'm pretty sure I would have heard of it.
When you can respond to what I said, get back to me.Nevertheless, the TEA Party was more of a stated threat to the GOP that spawned it than it ever was to the Left Wing that it was ideologically opposed to... And it has vanished quite conveniently down history's oubliette.
Pretty much the definition of "irrelevance."
Here's your chance to let me hear of it. I mean, from some other source than you just saying it.I'm pretty sure you wouldn't have.
Second, did the tea party implode, or did the newness just wear off and the media stopped covering them, so we don't hear much about them? If they had imploded, I'm pretty sure I would have heard of it.
Nevertheless, the TEA Party was more of a stated threat to the GOP that spawned it than it ever was to the Left Wing that it was ideologically opposed to... And it has vanished quite conveniently down history's oubliette.