- Jul 2, 2003
- 144,976
- 17,393
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Was it? Proof?That can be argued. It was dirty money.
The court decided the US must give it back. It was their money.
Upvote
0
Was it? Proof?That can be argued. It was dirty money.
The assets frozen in the first place was due to the export of terror by Iran.Was it? Proof?
The court decided the US must give it back. It was their money.
"Dirty" or not, it was their money. The US didn't give them 150 billion, the US unfroze IRAN'S 150 billion. So, you were wrong about that to begin with.The assets frozen in the first place was due to the export of terror by Iran.
Funny how bothered you are that the Democrats are not happy with the assassination of a high-ranking general from a nation that has the 15th most powerful military in the world in a volatile location and situation and that you blame it on "HE'S A TERRORIST!!!" (never mind he destroyed more of ISIS than America ever has)...Why are American democrats standing on the side of a known terrorist who was warned repeatedly to not leave Iran? Instead, he was at a meeting, not in Iran, but in Iraq with the head of Hezbollah to discuss what? Throwing a party for the Ayatollah or planning a vacation? Not hardly! Qasem Soleimani has been on the radar of terrorism since the 80's, led the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and since 1998 was commander of its Quds Force which is responsible for clandestine, extraterritorial operations. This was not an innocent politician and he didn't get to where he was by being nice to Christians. Again, I ask, why are American democrats standing on the side of a known terrorist? Yes, we have been actively involved with Iran one way or another since the early 50's and we shouldn't have, but that doesn't make people like Soleimani turn from a boy scout to a terrorist. He was on his way long before that and thought he was protected by the fear of Americans concerns of escalation from being targeted. Iran was granted a limited response, took it, and this chapter is closed as far as Iran goes. That said, the democrat party needs to stop playing politics as usual and support the free world over terrorists.
Every president before Obama did not release the funds. Why was that?"Dirty" or not, it was their money. The US didn't give them 150 billion, the US unfroze IRAN'S 150 billion. So, you were wrong about that to begin with.
If it's "dirty" then prove it. If you can't, then stop making things up. You were already proven wrong once, why should anyone trust your assertions without proof?
The score so far: USA 1, Iran 186.U.S. base in Iraq comes under attack from missiles, Iran claims credit
America got their desired result, now let's see what response America will have. How many times will we go back and forth escalating it?
How nice. Support murderers.Good for Iran
How many people have been killed by the US and it’s allies since the Iraq war? Get those numbers and compare them to how many people were killed by the Iranian regime and its own allies and you’ll get less than a fraction compared to what the US and it’s allies have done and still continue doing all over the Middle East. Also why is it wrong to fire missiles at military bases surrounding the borders of your own country?How nice. Support murderers.
Combatants and illegal combatants according to LOAC? I’m sure thousands of not tens of thousands. Deliberate attacks on non-Combatants? None.How many people have been killed by the US and it’s allies since the Iraq war?
How about the numbers of civilians killed in Iraq since the US’s invasion in 2003 that pretty much extends to half a million? And how about destabilizing mutlieoke countires in the Middle way in which countless others were also killed?Combatants and illegal combatants according to LOAC? I’m sure thousands of not tens of thousands. Deliberate attacks on non-Combatants? None.
The Iraqis were killing each other and 500K needs citation. Suleimani was responsible for thousands of Iraqi Sunni deaths in the civil war.How about the numbers of civilians killed in Iraq since the US’s invasion in 2003 that pretty much extends to half a million? And how about destabilizing mutlieoke countires in the Middle way in which countless others were also killed?
So the Iraqis killed half a million of each other, here’s a citation:The Iraqis were killing each other and 500K needs citation. Suleimani was responsible for thousands of Iraqi Sunni deaths in the civil war.
That’s what killing each other means.So the Iraqis killed half a million of each other, here’s a citation:
https://www.psr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/body-count.pdf
Surely you mean Sunni militia terrorist groups that obviously had no problem killing Christians or Shiites.
So they seriously killed half a million of each other while the US were just helping out?That’s what killing each other means.
Says nothing about 500kSo the Iraqis killed half a million of each other, here’s a citation:
https://www.psr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/body-count.pdf
Surely you mean Sunni militia terrorist groups that obviously had no problem killing Christians or Shiites.
That’s projection. And it’s not 500K. The report includes displaced people.So they seriously killed half a million of each other while the US were just helping out?
Was it? Proof?
The court decided the US must give it back. It was their money.
That and really belongs to the people suffering under the Mullah terrorist regime.It was the Shah’s money...
Was it? support?It was the Shah’s money...