Did Nancy use the "B" word?

[joshua 1 9]

Yes she did. Speaker Nancy Pelosi used the word “bribery”. Big mistake Nancy, there was no bribe, there was no crime and you do not have grounds for impeachment. Keep up the good work Nancy. You are making this abundantly clear that Trump did not break any laws. The fact that Trump is a law abiding citizen makes him disqualified for impeachment. Because impeachment requires for a law to be broken. Now that their meetings are no longer secret, it is becoming abundantly clear that they have nothing. They put a lot of time, effort and money into trying to find something. Still they always seem to end up empty handed with nothing of any substance to show for their efforts.

 

[JohnAshton]

Give it up, joshua 1 9. The offer of bribery and an extortion are obvious: those are crimes. The House can decide what is grounds for impeachment, not the citizenry. The House has made it abundantly clear that Trump has committed impeachable offenses.

End of story.

 

[A_Thinker]

Yes she did. Speaker Nancy Pelosi used the word “bribery”. Big mistake Nancy, there was no bribe, there was no crime and you do not have grounds for impeachment. Keep up the good work Nancy. You are making this abundantly clear that Trump did not break any laws. The fact that Trump is a law abiding citizen makes him disqualified for impeachment. Because impeachment requires for a law to be broken. Now that their meetings are no longer secret, it is becoming abundantly clear that they have nothing. They put a lot of time, effort and money into trying to find something. Still they always seem to end up empty handed with nothing of any substance to show for their efforts.

Everyone is using the bribery word, not just Nancy ...

 

[A_Thinker]

Give it up, joshua 1 9. The offer of bribery and an extortion are obvious: those are crimes. The House can decide what is grounds for impeachment, not the citizenry.

per the latest polls, the majority of the public would choose to impeach Trump, as well ...

 

[tulc]

(snip)They put a lot of time, effort and money into trying to find something. Still they always seem to end up empty handed with nothing of any substance to show for their efforts.

Well...unlike Benghazi, Hillary's emails and IRS targeting during President Obama's administration Muller's investigation led to a lot of convictions and fines being paid. So much so the Mueller investigation made $15,000,000 more then was spent on it. So it paid for itself, and then some.
tulc(will admit, the "President Obama's white suit!!" scandal is still his favorite Republican meltdown)

 

[CharismaticLady]

Give it up, joshua 1 9. The offer of bribery and an extortion are obvious: those are crimes. The House can decide what is grounds for impeachment, not the citizenry. The House has made it abundantly clear that Trump has committed impeachable offenses.

End of story.

Yikes! You sound like a Democrat!

 

[tulc]

Yikes! You sound like a Democrat!

...it was all those complete sentences and no misspelled words wasn't it? Those do tend to give us away!
tulc(thanks Charismaticlady, he got a nice laugh out of that post)

 

[JohnAshton]

JohnAshton said: ↑Give it up, joshua 1 9. The offer of bribery and an extortion are obvious: those are crimes. The House can decide what is grounds for impeachment, not the citizenry. The House has made it abundantly clear that Trump has committed impeachable offenses.

End of story.

Yikes! You sound like a Democrat!

I sound like a true blue to the square, a line and plummet American!

 

[JohnAshton]

God would approve of abortion in certain situations, yes, or God would not permit it at all.

Do you think God approves of capital punishment?

 

[CharismaticLady]

God would approve of abortion in certain situations, yes, or God would not permit it at all.

Only if the child is already dead in the womb.

Do you think God approves of capital punishment?

Of course. Read the Old Testament. There were no sacrifices one could make for breaking one of the Ten Commandments - they were put to death.

 

[tulc]

Do you believe abortion up through the day of delivery is what God would have you stand for? That is why Christian Democrat is an oxymoron.

No, that's why you might believe that, but since it's not up to you to decide those sorts of things, i'm going to have to point out, again, I'm a Christian and I'm a Democrat. So I guess were just going to have to go back to discussing the OP at this point.
tulc(is going to need to fetch more coffee at this point)

 

[joshua 1 9]

per the latest polls, the majority of the public would choose to impeach Trump, as well ...

Does that mean you are going to be surprised when he gets re elected?

 

[JohnAshton]

Only if the child is already dead in the womb.

Of course. Read the Old Testament. There were no sacrifices one could make for breaking one of the Ten Commandments - they were put to death.

Thank you for arguing why scriptural literalism is not holy.

 

[JohnAshton]

Does that mean you are going to be surprised when he gets re elected?

You are going to be far more shook when he is defeated and then sent to federal court.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Do you think God approves of capital punishment?

What did Jesus do with the women caught in Adultery? “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to cast a stone at her.” (John8:7) Everyone is guilty. We would all have to stone each other and no one would survive.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Thank you for arguing why scriptural literalism is not holy.

Everyone is worthy of death. Jesus paid the price for us. He went to calvery for us.

 

[joshua 1 9]

You are going to be far more shook when he is defeated and then sent to federal court.

How much money are you willing to put on that. I still have the $300 I won the last time he was elected and everyone was betting against him. In cold hard cash how much would you be willing to bet that he is NOT going to be re elected? The more you are willing to bet the better the odds are going to be for me when I win. Last time it was 85 to 15 on the day of the election. $15 would have returned $85.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Everyone is using the bribery word, not just Nancy ...

I have been saying all along that none of this is going to go anywhere. Now we can clearly see that because there was no bribery involved.

 

[kiwimac]

Yes she did. Speaker Nancy Pelosi used the word “bribery”. Big mistake Nancy, there was no bribe, there was no crime and you do not have grounds for impeachment. Keep up the good work Nancy. You are making this abundantly clear that Trump did not break any laws. The fact that Trump is a law abiding citizen makes him disqualified for impeachment. Because impeachment requires for a law to be broken. Now that their meetings are no longer secret, it is becoming abundantly clear that they have nothing. They put a lot of time, effort and money into trying to find something. Still they always seem to end up empty handed with nothing of any substance to show for their efforts.

Look at that! Almost every word in your post was wrong! Surely there is some kind of award for that?

 

[SarahsKnight]

Do you believe abortion up through the day of delivery is what God would have you stand for? That is why Christian Democrat is an oxymoron.

cc: @SarahsKnight

Since you copied me on that, no I do not. I am for the most part actually more with the pro-life (generally Republican) crowd on the topic of abortion. The only way in which I might be considered pro-choice is that I still find it difficult to judge women who are alone and scared and have to be the ones to bear the burdens that pregnancy holds, when they have an abortion to either save their own lives or because they are not certain the child can be properly cared for (especially if their boyfriends who took every part of the responsibility in causing the pregnancy as the women themselves do, ditch them). I just wish personally that the lady would choose to go through with giving birth, as abortion isn't a pretty thing in and of itself no matter what the reason for it. It is terminating an organism that was going to be born as a real, living human being in all but the extreme cases (where the child was not going to survive no matter what), after all, so I definitely agree that it is not right for a woman to have an abortion (or her husband/boyfriend to forcefully persuade her to) just because she (and her man) does not want to deal with the responsibility of the consequences of unprotected sex or something like that.

Abortion isn't the only issue, however. Wouldn't it be just as fair, then, to proclaim that Christians can't be Republicans since as a whole Republicans don't seem to pay that much attention to caring for the poorer and less fortunate among us? Appearing to hold mammon on a pretty high pedestal? So a Republican's or Democrat's validity as a Christian isn't exactly in black and white here. And besides, not all Democrats are just blatantly, callously pro-choice. Just as not all Republicans are heartless rich elites who just sit twiddling their thumbs telling the homeless that they probably deserve their fate for not just going out and getting a job.