eleos1954

God is Love
Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
9,696
5,613
Utah
✟713,367.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Many of the theories about the meaning of Revelation and other Biblical prophecies that we see on Christian Forums assume that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem. It is possible for Jews to rebuild the Temple. If they do, it will be called the Third Temple. The Temple standing at the time of Christ was the Second Temple. The Jewish Law allows a new Temple to be built, but a Third Temple may not be politically possible. There would be an international backlash. Very few Israelis are interested in the project, either as a matter of national pride, or as a matter of religious practice.

While Israelis could build a new Temple, if they wanted to badly enough, they cannot make a new Ark. The original Ark made at the time of Moses has been lost, it was destroyed. I have run into CF posters who become testy if you say that the Ark no longer exists, but it is settled history. Jeremiah referred to the loss of the Ark.

"In those days, when your numbers have increased greatly in the land,” declares the Lord, “people will no longer say, ‘The ark of the covenant of the Lord.’ It will never enter their minds or be remembered; it will not be missed, nor will another one be made."
Jeremiah 3:16 NIV

Here Jeremiah either predicts the destruction of the Ark, or it has already happened. Jeremiah predicts that memory of the Ark will fade and it will become ancient history. Why didn't the Israelites make a new Ark to replace the one lost to a foreign enemy? Making a new Ark according to the directions laid down in Exodus might seem straightforward. In Exodus 31, God tells Moses that He has chosen Bezalel and Oholiab to make the Ark and other furnishings of the Tabernacle. Bezalel was the master craftsman and Oholiab was his associate, or assistant.

Then the Lord said to Moses, 2 “See, I have chosen Bezalel son of Uri, the son of Hur, of the tribe of Judah, 3 and I have filled him with the Spirit of God, with wisdom, with understanding, with knowledge and with all kinds of skills— 4 to make artistic designs for work in gold, silver and bronze, 5 to cut and set stones, to work in wood, and to engage in all kinds of crafts. 6 Moreover, I have appointed Oholiab son of Ahisamak, of the tribe of Dan, to help him. Also I have given ability to all the skilled workers to make everything I have commanded you: 7 the tent of meeting, the ark of the covenant law with the atonement cover on it, and all the other furnishings of the tent— 8 the table and its articles, the pure gold lampstand and all its accessories, the altar of incense, 9 the altar of burnt offering and all its utensils, the basin with its stand— 10 and also the woven garments, both the sacred garments for Aaron the priest and the garments for his sons when they serve as priests, 11 and the anointing oil and fragrant incense for the Holy Place. They are to make them just as I commanded you.”
Exodus 31: 1-11 NIV


God commanded that the Ark be made by Bezalel and Oholiab. When these two men passed away, there was no way to follow God's commands in making a new Ark.

What did they use for an Ark in the Second Temple? The Holy of Holies was empty.

As the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia tells us, at the time of Ezekiel:

"There was then no Ark of the Covenant, but Jewish tradition relates that the blood of the great Day of Atonement was sprinkled on an unhewn stone that stood in its place. In Herod's temple ... The holiest place continued empty."
--International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

Link
Holy of Holies in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia.


Jesus seems to have indirectly referred to the Holy of Holies being an empty room in Matthew 23: 16-22. Here He is criticizing the Pharisees for swearing on the Temple and on the altar in the Temple. He does not mention swearing on the Ark. No one made that mistake because they knew there was no Ark in the Temple.

Where does this leave us? Modern day Jews cannot build another Ark. Jewish scripture doesn't leave any wiggle room, and there is the precedent of the Second Temple. A new Ark wasn't made then, so one won't be made now.

There are several reasons that few Jews are interested in building a new Temple. In Old Testament times, most families owned animals, even if that wasn't their main business. Sacrificing animals at the Temple in gratitude to God, or by way of asking forgiveness, made sense to people. But how many Jews own sheep today? Jews have done without animal sacrifice for almost two thousand years and few want to bring it back.

If it were possible to make a new Ark and place it in a new Temple, that could be a matter of national and religious pride. Without an Ark, it may not be worth the trouble.

***

The REAL temple is in heaven and always has been, it is where God lives

The earthly ones were a copy of the real one in heaven.

Acts 17:24

"The God who made the world and all things in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands;

Hebrews 9:24

For Christ did not enter a holy place made with hands, a mere copy of the true one, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us;

Hebrews 9:11

But when Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things to come, He entered through the greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this creation;

An earthly temple will not be rebuilt. Jesus is our high priest and is in the temple in heaven (the REAL one)

When Jesus left the last earthly temple, He never returned to it ... left it desolate.

Matthew 23

37O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those sent to her, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were unwilling! 38Look, your house is left to you desolate. 39For I tell you that you will not see Me again until you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.’

Matthew 24

1As Jesus left the temple and was walking away, His disciples came up to Him to point out its buildings.

2“Do you see all these things?” He replied. “Truly I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.”

The temple was left desolate because Jesus being in the temple was the Shekinah glory. By walking out of it and never returning ... the Shekinah glory left (Himself) never to return to a man made temple again.

Matthew 23

39For I tell you that you will not see Me again until you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.’

That is ... when He returns.

Revelation 11

19Then the temple of God in heaven was opened, and the ark of His covenant appeared in His temple. And there were flashes of lightning, and rumblings, and peals of thunder, and an earthquake, and a great hailstorm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treasurer
Upvote 0

tampasteve

Pray for peace in Israel
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Angels Team
CF Senior Ambassador
Supporter
May 15, 2017
25,196
7,287
Tampa
✟767,634.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
They used a Torah ark in their synagogues. There is a stone carving depicting one at the Byzantine synagogue at Capernaum. Jews are allowed to walk half a mile on the Sabbath to go to a synagogue. The Jewish apostles went to synagogues to teach about Jesus.

The Dome of the Rock is on Mt. Moriah above the Western Wall where the temple used to be. The Muslims own this land. Israel is surrounded by Muslims on three sides. They have been threatened with jihad.

Christians outlawed sacrificial worship. The scriptures states, “I desired mercy and not sacrifice.” Hosea 6:6, Matthew 9:13

Jewish people still have a Torah ark in every synagogue. Taking the Torah out to read from it is a big deal, their devotion to the word of God is inspiring. Christians may have outlawed sacrificial worship, but the Apostles most certainly did not and Paul participated according to Acts. Their devotion to the Temple and time spent there at the start of the movement could even classify them as a Temple cult of the time. They certainly participated in the sacrificial system until the Temple was destroyed in 70AD.
 
Upvote 0

dqhall

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jul 21, 2015
7,547
4,171
Florida
Visit site
✟766,603.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Jewish people still have a Torah ark in every synagogue. Taking the Torah out to read from it is a big deal, their devotion to the word of God is inspiring. Christians may have outlawed sacrificial worship, but the Apostles most certainly did not and Paul participated according to Acts. Their devotion to the Temple and time spent there at the start of the movement could even classify them as a Temple cult of the time. They certainly participated in the sacrificial system until the Temple was destroyed in 70AD.
Paul argued that Gentiles should be free from the Jewish law in Acts 15. Jesus paid the temple tax as did Peter. Jesus had to attend the festivals in Jerusalem in obedience to Torah law as God sent him to preach to the Jews first. He did not adhere to the strictest Sabbath laws. He said God was working seven days a week. He tipped over the tables of those selling sacrificial animals and those changing money in the temple. He described the place as a den of thieves. Money was more important to them than truth, mercy and justice. He did not approve of some of their laws, yet was opposed to lies, adultery and murder.
 
Upvote 0

tampasteve

Pray for peace in Israel
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Angels Team
CF Senior Ambassador
Supporter
May 15, 2017
25,196
7,287
Tampa
✟767,634.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Paul argued that Gentiles should be free from the Jewish law in Acts 15. Jesus paid the temple tax as did Peter. Jesus had to attend the festivals in Jerusalem in obedience to Torah law as God sent him to preach to the Jews first. He did not adhere to the strictest Sabbath laws. He said God was working seven days a week. He tipped over the tables of those selling sacrificial animals and those changing money in the temple. He described the place as a den of thieves. Money was more important to them than truth, mercy and justice. He did not approve of some of their laws, yet was opposed to lies, adultery and murder.
I mostly agree, most of what you wrote is just a recap of the Gospels. We could take the discussion further, but it would be off topic for this thread and really this forum, so I shall leave this topic here. :)
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,558
2,480
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟290,689.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
So on Passover lamb sacrifice day how are all those lambs going to be sacrificed on one day during the prescribed hours for many millions of people in the new temple? I do not think a slaughterhouse big enough could be built. It would need to be capable of processing a million or more lambs in a few hours on one day. That's probably impossible to do. The whole idea of renewed sacrifices makes the new temple an absurd idea and what's the point of a temple with sacrificial altar and basin (the molten sea) if not to offer animal sacrifices to God?
Read Ezekiel 43 to 46 for a detailed account of the Temple operation during the last few years before Jesus Returns.
Then Zechariah 14:16-21 describes it after the Return.
After the Millennium, the Temple will be no more. Revelation 21:22-24
 
Upvote 0

CharismaticLady

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jun 14, 2019
2,596
654
76
Tennessee
✟140,294.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Celibate
Many of the theories about the meaning of Revelation and other Biblical prophecies that we see on Christian Forums assume that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem. It is possible for Jews to rebuild the Temple. If they do, it will be called the Third Temple. The Temple standing at the time of Christ was the Second Temple. The Jewish Law allows a new Temple to be built, but a Third Temple may not be politically possible. There would be an international backlash. Very few Israelis are interested in the project, either as a matter of national pride, or as a matter of religious practice.

While Israelis could build a new Temple, if they wanted to badly enough, they cannot make a new Ark. The original Ark made at the time of Moses has been lost, it was destroyed. I have run into CF posters who become testy if you say that the Ark no longer exists, but it is settled history. Jeremiah referred to the loss of the Ark.

"In those days, when your numbers have increased greatly in the land,” declares the Lord, “people will no longer say, ‘The ark of the covenant of the Lord.’ It will never enter their minds or be remembered; it will not be missed, nor will another one be made."
Jeremiah 3:16 NIV

Here Jeremiah either predicts the destruction of the Ark, or it has already happened. Jeremiah predicts that memory of the Ark will fade and it will become ancient history. Why didn't the Israelites make a new Ark to replace the one lost to a foreign enemy? Making a new Ark according to the directions laid down in Exodus might seem straightforward. In Exodus 31, God tells Moses that He has chosen Bezalel and Oholiab to make the Ark and other furnishings of the Tabernacle. Bezalel was the master craftsman and Oholiab was his associate, or assistant.

Then the Lord said to Moses, 2 “See, I have chosen Bezalel son of Uri, the son of Hur, of the tribe of Judah, 3 and I have filled him with the Spirit of God, with wisdom, with understanding, with knowledge and with all kinds of skills— 4 to make artistic designs for work in gold, silver and bronze, 5 to cut and set stones, to work in wood, and to engage in all kinds of crafts. 6 Moreover, I have appointed Oholiab son of Ahisamak, of the tribe of Dan, to help him. Also I have given ability to all the skilled workers to make everything I have commanded you: 7 the tent of meeting, the ark of the covenant law with the atonement cover on it, and all the other furnishings of the tent— 8 the table and its articles, the pure gold lampstand and all its accessories, the altar of incense, 9 the altar of burnt offering and all its utensils, the basin with its stand— 10 and also the woven garments, both the sacred garments for Aaron the priest and the garments for his sons when they serve as priests, 11 and the anointing oil and fragrant incense for the Holy Place. They are to make them just as I commanded you.”
Exodus 31: 1-11 NIV


God commanded that the Ark be made by Bezalel and Oholiab. When these two men passed away, there was no way to follow God's commands in making a new Ark.

What did they use for an Ark in the Second Temple? The Holy of Holies was empty.

As the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia tells us, at the time of Ezekiel:

"There was then no Ark of the Covenant, but Jewish tradition relates that the blood of the great Day of Atonement was sprinkled on an unhewn stone that stood in its place. In Herod's temple ... The holiest place continued empty."
--International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

Link
Holy of Holies in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia.


Jesus seems to have indirectly referred to the Holy of Holies being an empty room in Matthew 23: 16-22. Here He is criticizing the Pharisees for swearing on the Temple and on the altar in the Temple. He does not mention swearing on the Ark. No one made that mistake because they knew there was no Ark in the Temple.

Where does this leave us? Modern day Jews cannot build another Ark. Jewish scripture doesn't leave any wiggle room, and there is the precedent of the Second Temple. A new Ark wasn't made then, so one won't be made now.

There are several reasons that few Jews are interested in building a new Temple. In Old Testament times, most families owned animals, even if that wasn't their main business. Sacrificing animals at the Temple in gratitude to God, or by way of asking forgiveness, made sense to people. But how many Jews own sheep today? Jews have done without animal sacrifice for almost two thousand years and few want to bring it back.

If it were possible to make a new Ark and place it in a new Temple, that could be a matter of national and religious pride. Without an Ark, it may not be worth the trouble.

I believe the report that the Ark of the Covenant exists in Ethiopia and has been under guard for centuries. No one can confirm by sight what is actually in this building guarded by one priest, and when he is old, he tells the secret to one young priest who then takes over, while the old priest must die inside, and so on. It is necessary that this priest be extremely pious and devotes his life to this cause and this secret, and never leaves the temple. There is a celebration each month using a replica of the ark of the Covenant, but the actual ark is never viewed.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,587
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,240.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Dale said:
Many of the theories about the meaning of Revelation and other Biblical prophecies that we see on Christian Forums assume that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem. It is possible for Jews to rebuild the Temple. If they do, it will be called the Third Temple. The Temple standing at the time of Christ was the Second Temple. The Jewish Law allows a new Temple to be built, but a Third Temple may not be politically possible. There would be an international backlash. Very few Israelis are interested in the project, either as a matter of national pride, or as a matter of religious practice.
It is the Sanctuary being measured in Revelation, not the Temple...........

The Court in Revelation 11:2

Revelation 11:

1 And was given to me a reed like-as rod saying "rouse! and measure! the Sanctuary<3485> of the God and the Altar[Golden Altar] and those worshiping in it.
2 And the Court/fold<833>[water lavar/Altar of Sacrifice], outside of the Sanctuary, be casting-out!<1544> out-side<1854>, and no it thou should be measuring, that it was given to the nations
And the holy City they shall be treading/pathsousin <3961>(5692) forty two months.
Here's a suggestion on the Ark of the Covenant being seen in Revelation 11:19.
We know that Revelation is full of symbolism, some of it hard to penetrate. It may have been written that way because Christians were under deadly persecution at the time it was written, and there may be other reasons.
Consider:
The Ark of the Covenant is the symbol of the Old Covenant in the Old Testament.
The Cross is the symbol of the New Covenant in the New Testament.
Is it possible that when Revelation tells us that the Ark is seen in God's sanctuary in heaven, that what is really intended is not the symbol of the Old Covenant, but the symbol of the New Covenant, namely, the Cross?
Think about it.
The Jews need to read Revelation so the veil of Moses will be lifted off their face......It is indeed written in OT/OC Hebrew symbolism.....

2 Corinthians 3:

12 Having then such hope, we use much freedom of speech, 13 and [are] not as Moses, who was putting a veil<2571> upon his own face, for the sons of Israel not stedfastly to look to the end of that which is being made useless
14 But their minds were hardened, for unto this day the same veil<2571> at the reading of the Old Covenant doth remain unwithdrawn — which in Christ is being made useless —
15 but till to-day, when Moses is read, a veil<2571> upon their heart doth lie,
16 and whenever they may turn unto the Lord, the veil is taken away.
17 And the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord [is], there [is] liberty; 18 and we all, with unvailed face, the glory of the Lord beholding in a mirror, to the same image are being transformed, from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.
===============
Luke 2:32
a light to the uncovering<602> of nations, and the glory of Thy people Israel.'

Revelation 1:1
An unveiling/revealing <602> of Jesus Christ, which gives to him, the God, to show to the bond-servants of Him which-things is binding to be becoming in swiftness.
And He signifies-it, commissioning thru the messenger of Him, to the bond-servant of Him, John.

602. apokalupsis from 601;
disclosure:--appearing, coming, lighten, manifestation, be revealed, revelation.
575. apo apo' a primary particle;
"off," i.e. away (from something near),
2572. kalupto akin to 2813 and 2928;
to cover up (literally or figuratively):--cover, hide.

================================
Allusions in Revelation from Old Testament

One man studied and found 348 allusions (not illusions, Light) in Revelation from the Old Testament. You see the similarity in wording and the context mirrored in Revelation and the particular Old Testament story, and immediately can recognize the reference source!
That's IF you know the bible well enough to even notice that.

95 of the 348 plain references used in Revelation as taken from the Old Testament are repeated in Revelation.
That makes about 250 Old Testament passages are cited. How many chapters are in Revelation? 22. That makes about TEN OLD TESTAMENT REFERENCES FOR EVERY CHAPTER!
============================
http://www.kingdombiblestudies.org/tablecontents.htm

Kindgdom Bible Studies Revelation Series Part 1


"Teaching the things concerning the kingdom of God..."
FROM THE CANDLESTICK TO THE THRONE
Part 1

The mark of the beast. Armageddon. The Four Horsemen. The false prophet. Babylon the great. Falling stars, stinging locusts, and giant hailstones. The seven last plagues. The bottomless pit. The lake of fire. These images of terror and catastrophe from the book of Revelation have greatly influenced the thinking of millions of Christians through the ages.

Even the secular press uses images such as "Armageddon" and "four horsemen of the Apocalypse" to describe calamities in our world. Despite 1900 years of fascination with the book of Revelation, John’s letter to the seven Churches of Asia continues to be misunderstood. And badly misinterpreted!

One misconception shared by some is that the Revelation has nothing of importance to say to us. It’s considered to be merely a bizarre piece of first-century writing with no relevance for today.
Another wrong idea is that the Revelation is a code book describing a specific outline of history written in advance. Countless interpreters have tried to "decode" the book from a historical perspective to find all the major world events of the past 1900 years.
Others interpret it more literally as a handbook for predicting the cataclysmic events that will bring the final wrath of God and the end of the world.
The claims of Christian groups from the early church to the present — that the Revelation pinpoints the events, personalities, and time periods of "the end" — have all failed.
This should be a caution to believers for using the book of Revelation as a predictive handbook. Other people’s interpretation of the book of Revelation is based on the "Pan Theory" — it’s all going to pan out in the end! Beloved brethren, the fact is, it’s not panning out the way the end-time prognosticators are projecting!

Through the years I have ministered the Word in Bible studies, seminars, and church services of various types.
When there has been a question and answer session, or when opportunity was granted for people to request teaching along a particular line, the most often requested subject has been — THE BOOK OF REVELATION!

I have met people who were babes in Christ, carnal Christians whose lives were a mess, they had incredible problems and needs, including deliverance, and instead of prayer or counsel or messages that would help them overcome and grow up in Christ, they wanted me to teach them the book of Revelation! "Yeah, brother, that’s for me, lay it on me, I want the book of Revelation!
===========================
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Redwingfan9

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2019
2,629
1,532
Midwest
✟70,636.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Many of the theories about the meaning of Revelation and other Biblical prophecies that we see on Christian Forums assume that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem. It is possible for Jews to rebuild the Temple. If they do, it will be called the Third Temple. The Temple standing at the time of Christ was the Second Temple. The Jewish Law allows a new Temple to be built, but a Third Temple may not be politically possible. There would be an international backlash. Very few Israelis are interested in the project, either as a matter of national pride, or as a matter of religious practice.

While Israelis could build a new Temple, if they wanted to badly enough, they cannot make a new Ark. The original Ark made at the time of Moses has been lost, it was destroyed. I have run into CF posters who become testy if you say that the Ark no longer exists, but it is settled history. Jeremiah referred to the loss of the Ark.

"In those days, when your numbers have increased greatly in the land,” declares the Lord, “people will no longer say, ‘The ark of the covenant of the Lord.’ It will never enter their minds or be remembered; it will not be missed, nor will another one be made."
Jeremiah 3:16 NIV

Here Jeremiah either predicts the destruction of the Ark, or it has already happened. Jeremiah predicts that memory of the Ark will fade and it will become ancient history. Why didn't the Israelites make a new Ark to replace the one lost to a foreign enemy? Making a new Ark according to the directions laid down in Exodus might seem straightforward. In Exodus 31, God tells Moses that He has chosen Bezalel and Oholiab to make the Ark and other furnishings of the Tabernacle. Bezalel was the master craftsman and Oholiab was his associate, or assistant.

Then the Lord said to Moses, 2 “See, I have chosen Bezalel son of Uri, the son of Hur, of the tribe of Judah, 3 and I have filled him with the Spirit of God, with wisdom, with understanding, with knowledge and with all kinds of skills— 4 to make artistic designs for work in gold, silver and bronze, 5 to cut and set stones, to work in wood, and to engage in all kinds of crafts. 6 Moreover, I have appointed Oholiab son of Ahisamak, of the tribe of Dan, to help him. Also I have given ability to all the skilled workers to make everything I have commanded you: 7 the tent of meeting, the ark of the covenant law with the atonement cover on it, and all the other furnishings of the tent— 8 the table and its articles, the pure gold lampstand and all its accessories, the altar of incense, 9 the altar of burnt offering and all its utensils, the basin with its stand— 10 and also the woven garments, both the sacred garments for Aaron the priest and the garments for his sons when they serve as priests, 11 and the anointing oil and fragrant incense for the Holy Place. They are to make them just as I commanded you.”
Exodus 31: 1-11 NIV


God commanded that the Ark be made by Bezalel and Oholiab. When these two men passed away, there was no way to follow God's commands in making a new Ark.

What did they use for an Ark in the Second Temple? The Holy of Holies was empty.

As the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia tells us, at the time of Ezekiel:

"There was then no Ark of the Covenant, but Jewish tradition relates that the blood of the great Day of Atonement was sprinkled on an unhewn stone that stood in its place. In Herod's temple ... The holiest place continued empty."
--International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

Link
Holy of Holies in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia.


Jesus seems to have indirectly referred to the Holy of Holies being an empty room in Matthew 23: 16-22. Here He is criticizing the Pharisees for swearing on the Temple and on the altar in the Temple. He does not mention swearing on the Ark. No one made that mistake because they knew there was no Ark in the Temple.

Where does this leave us? Modern day Jews cannot build another Ark. Jewish scripture doesn't leave any wiggle room, and there is the precedent of the Second Temple. A new Ark wasn't made then, so one won't be made now.

There are several reasons that few Jews are interested in building a new Temple. In Old Testament times, most families owned animals, even if that wasn't their main business. Sacrificing animals at the Temple in gratitude to God, or by way of asking forgiveness, made sense to people. But how many Jews own sheep today? Jews have done without animal sacrifice for almost two thousand years and few want to bring it back.

If it were possible to make a new Ark and place it in a new Temple, that could be a matter of national and religious pride. Without an Ark, it may not be worth the trouble.
The Israelis can build whatever they want. It won't be a legitimate temple because God won't dwell there. It also would have no bearing on the Christian faith nor will it have any bearing on the world generally.
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,558
2,480
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟290,689.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
The Israelis can build whatever they want. It won't be a legitimate temple because God won't dwell there. It also would have no bearing on the Christian faith nor will it have any bearing on the world generally.
The Jewish State of Israel has no desire to build the Temple. A few Israelis are trying to do it, but the State and the Moslem Wakif will not allow it.
It will be the Israelite people of God, faithful Christians who will do it. Zechariah 6:15
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Redwingfan9

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2019
2,629
1,532
Midwest
✟70,636.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
The Jewish State of Israel has no desire to build the Temple. A few Israelis are trying to do it, but the State and the Moslem Wakif will not allow it.
It will be the Israelite people of God, faithful Christians who will do it. Zechariah 6:15
There is no need for a temple, Christ did away with it. The whole point of the temple was for sacrifices, which aren't part of things anymore. Jesus is the one sacrifice we need, there's no need for a temple now.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,587
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,240.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
The Jewish State of Israel has no desire to build the Temple. A few Israelis are trying to do it, but the State and the Moslem Wakif will not allow it.
It will be the Israelite people of God, faithful Christians who will do it. Zechariah 6:15
Ummm, ok...........
There is no need for a temple, Christ did away with it. The whole point of the temple was for sacrifices, which aren't part of things anymore. Jesus is the one sacrifice we need, there's no need for a temple now.
Evidently, there are some Christian sects that want it to be built to hasten the return of Christ and the "Rapture".
Of course the Jews laugh at that as being Christian Zionist nonsense.
Good post............


The Greek shows the court being "cast out outside" and given to the Gentiles.....interesting

Revelation 11:
1 And was given to me a reed like-as rod saying "rouse! and measure! the Sanctuary<3485> of the God and the Altar[Golden Altar] and those worshiping in it
2 and the Court/fold<833>[Lavar/Altar of Sacrifice] outside of the Sanctuary, be casting-out!<1544> out-side<1854>, and no it thou should be measuring, that it was given to the nations/gentiles
and the holy City they shall be treading<3961> forty two months.[Luke 21:24]

Which is similar to Luk 21:24
Luke 21:24 “And they will fall by the edge of the sword, and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled<3961> by Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.” [Revelation 11:2]

It is the same word used for the Court of the High Priest.....

Matthew 26:3
Then were gathered together the Chief-priests and the Scribes, and the Elders of the people to the court/fold/aulhn<833> of the Chief-priest who was called Caiaphas [Revelation 11:2]

Notice the Court of the Priest located outside of the Sanctuary in this diagram.......

The Bible Journey | Jesus heralds the end of the sacrificial system

Jesus heralds the end of the sacrificial system
Mk 11:15-19 Meanwhile, on the Monday morning, Jesus enters the outer courtyard of the Temple (see Malachi 3:1 and Map 12) and begins driving out the merchants who are selling birds to be offered as sacrifices. His symbolic actions – destroying the sacrificial system of the Temple for a short time – point towards the coming destruction of the Temple. With the ultimate sacrifice about to be paid by the death of Jesus – the “Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” (John 1:29) – the Temple has outlived its purpose as the place where Jews offered sacrifices to gain God’s favour.

The Jewish crowds would also have been well aware that Jesus, by his actions, was fulfilling Zechariah's prophesy about the start of the 'End Times': "At that time there will not be any buyers or sellers in the Temple of the LORD All-powerful." (Zechariah 14:21

Mk 11:27-33 The following day (Tuesday), Jesus teaches beneath Solomon’s Porch in the Temple courtyards in Jerusalem (see Map 12). The chief priests and rabbis demand to know by whose authority Jesus is teaching, but Jesus replies with a counter-question (a typical form of rabbinic debate) and refuses to say anything that will give them the opportunity to arrest him.
901.jpg


Visual Timeline of the Roman-Jewish War ARTchive

"..probably the greatest single slaughter in ancient history."
ROMAN SIEGE AND SACK OF JERUSALEM


CAST OF CHARACTERS: Roman: Emperor Nero | General Vespasian | General Titus | The Roman Army || Jewish: General / Historian Josephus | Factional Leaders in Jerusalem || Administrators of Roman Judea Targets: Jerusalem | Herod's Temple // Maps of the Roman Invasion // Theological Timeline

CHRONOLOGY IMMEDIATELY SURROUNDING THE WAR

Stage 1: Murder of James the Just, "Opposition High Priest" ; Irrevocable Split: 62
Stage 2: General Revolt in Jerusalem ; Zealot Occupation of Masada: August-September 66
Stage 3: The Campaign of Cestius Gallus and the Defeat of the Twelfth Legion: October-November 66
Stage 4: End of Collaborative Government, Priesthood ; General Flight: November 66 - March 67
Part 6: Vespasian Subdues Northern and Western Palestine: December 66 - December 68
Part 7: Three-way Power Struggle within Jerusalem After Roman Retreat: January 68 - May 70
Part 8: Romans Breach City Walls and Leave Jerusalem Desolate: May 10 - September 10, 70


 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

JacksBratt

Searching for Truth
Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
16,282
6,482
62
✟570,596.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Many of the theories about the meaning of Revelation and other Biblical prophecies that we see on Christian Forums assume that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem. It is possible for Jews to rebuild the Temple. If they do, it will be called the Third Temple. The Temple standing at the time of Christ was the Second Temple. The Jewish Law allows a new Temple to be built, but a Third Temple may not be politically possible. There would be an international backlash. Very few Israelis are interested in the project, either as a matter of national pride, or as a matter of religious practice.

While Israelis could build a new Temple, if they wanted to badly enough, they cannot make a new Ark. The original Ark made at the time of Moses has been lost, it was destroyed. I have run into CF posters who become testy if you say that the Ark no longer exists, but it is settled history. Jeremiah referred to the loss of the Ark.

"In those days, when your numbers have increased greatly in the land,” declares the Lord, “people will no longer say, ‘The ark of the covenant of the Lord.’ It will never enter their minds or be remembered; it will not be missed, nor will another one be made."
Jeremiah 3:16 NIV

Here Jeremiah either predicts the destruction of the Ark, or it has already happened. Jeremiah predicts that memory of the Ark will fade and it will become ancient history. Why didn't the Israelites make a new Ark to replace the one lost to a foreign enemy? Making a new Ark according to the directions laid down in Exodus might seem straightforward. In Exodus 31, God tells Moses that He has chosen Bezalel and Oholiab to make the Ark and other furnishings of the Tabernacle. Bezalel was the master craftsman and Oholiab was his associate, or assistant.

Then the Lord said to Moses, 2 “See, I have chosen Bezalel son of Uri, the son of Hur, of the tribe of Judah, 3 and I have filled him with the Spirit of God, with wisdom, with understanding, with knowledge and with all kinds of skills— 4 to make artistic designs for work in gold, silver and bronze, 5 to cut and set stones, to work in wood, and to engage in all kinds of crafts. 6 Moreover, I have appointed Oholiab son of Ahisamak, of the tribe of Dan, to help him. Also I have given ability to all the skilled workers to make everything I have commanded you: 7 the tent of meeting, the ark of the covenant law with the atonement cover on it, and all the other furnishings of the tent— 8 the table and its articles, the pure gold lampstand and all its accessories, the altar of incense, 9 the altar of burnt offering and all its utensils, the basin with its stand— 10 and also the woven garments, both the sacred garments for Aaron the priest and the garments for his sons when they serve as priests, 11 and the anointing oil and fragrant incense for the Holy Place. They are to make them just as I commanded you.”
Exodus 31: 1-11 NIV


God commanded that the Ark be made by Bezalel and Oholiab. When these two men passed away, there was no way to follow God's commands in making a new Ark.

What did they use for an Ark in the Second Temple? The Holy of Holies was empty.

As the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia tells us, at the time of Ezekiel:

"There was then no Ark of the Covenant, but Jewish tradition relates that the blood of the great Day of Atonement was sprinkled on an unhewn stone that stood in its place. In Herod's temple ... The holiest place continued empty."
--International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

Link
Holy of Holies in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia.


Jesus seems to have indirectly referred to the Holy of Holies being an empty room in Matthew 23: 16-22. Here He is criticizing the Pharisees for swearing on the Temple and on the altar in the Temple. He does not mention swearing on the Ark. No one made that mistake because they knew there was no Ark in the Temple.

Where does this leave us? Modern day Jews cannot build another Ark. Jewish scripture doesn't leave any wiggle room, and there is the precedent of the Second Temple. A new Ark wasn't made then, so one won't be made now.

There are several reasons that few Jews are interested in building a new Temple. In Old Testament times, most families owned animals, even if that wasn't their main business. Sacrificing animals at the Temple in gratitude to God, or by way of asking forgiveness, made sense to people. But how many Jews own sheep today? Jews have done without animal sacrifice for almost two thousand years and few want to bring it back.

If it were possible to make a new Ark and place it in a new Temple, that could be a matter of national and religious pride. Without an Ark, it may not be worth the trouble.
I bet that they have the ark...... Don't underestimate these people.
 
Upvote 0

JacksBratt

Searching for Truth
Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
16,282
6,482
62
✟570,596.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
There is no need for a temple, Christ did away with it. The whole point of the temple was for sacrifices, which aren't part of things anymore. Jesus is the one sacrifice we need, there's no need for a temple now.
This is very true. However.. When the church is no longer here and the antichrist is ruling.... the bible states that the Jewish people will be following the old ways.. And, the antichrist will desecrate their holy of holys... Right?

These will be the people who are still waiting for their messiah... To them.. sacrifices are still necessary..

The temple will be built.. the sacrifices will resume... the ark's location ... ya... I bet they know.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,587
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,240.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
This is very true. However.. When the church is no longer here and the antichrist is ruling....
The temple will be built.. the sacrifices will resume... the ark's location ... ya... I bet they know.
The Orthodox Church says they have and the Catholics say they have it.
The Jews also think the Catholics have it.

Will the Ark ever be found?

It has been.
The Knights Templar carried it down from Mt Ararat, reassembled it, loaded it with the ark of the covenant and all the scrolls from the Library of Alexandria, and sailed it to secret island somewhere just south of Bermuda.
The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church has it, but that's just me.
Nope, it's in a Catholic Church; I've seen the pictures ;)

walsingtab2.jpg
Yes, the Vatican owns it.
From this article I read sometime back, Israel also thinks the Vatican has the Menorah:

Israel Seeks Return of Temple Artifacts


ISRAEL SEEKS RETURN OF TEMPLE ARTIFACTS

Rabbis urge Vatican to permit search of storerooms for treasures

http://www.WorldNetDaily.com When Israel's chief rabbis meet Pope John Paul II today, they will seek permission to search Vatican storerooms for artifacts
such as the huge golden menorah that stood in the Temple in Jerusalem 2,000 years ago.
Vatican officials confirmed to the Associated Press the meeting would take place but declined comment on the rabbis' request.
Yehuda Metzger and Shlomo Amar are to have an audience with Pope John Paul, the first by Israel's chief rabbis in the Vatican.
The pope met Israel's previous chief rabbis during his visit in 2000



https://www.history.com/news/fate-of-the-lost-ark-revealed


According to the Bible, Moses had the Ark of the Covenant built to hold the Ten Commandments at the command of God. The Israelites carried the Ark with them during their 40 years spent wandering in the desert, and after the conquest of Canaan, it was brought to Shiloh. King David later took the Ark to Jerusalem, where his son and successor, Solomon, eventually installed it in the temple. Since its disappearance, some 2,000 years ago, numerous theories have arisen about its fate. One of the most well known holds that Levitical priests moved the Ark to Egypt just before the Babylonians sacked Jerusalem in 586 B.C. From there it was supposedly moved to Ethiopia, where it resides to this day in the town of Aksum, in the St. Mary of Zion cathedral. Only one man, a monk known as “the Guardian,” is allowed to see the Ark, and church authorities have never allowed it to be studied to determine its authenticity.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Dale

Senior Veteran
Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,161
1,223
71
Sebring, FL
✟657,505.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
No; many millions, a vast multitude, John see us in Jerusalem and the holy Land; Revelation 7:9, paralleled by Isaiah 66:18b-21
WE will occupy all that area given to Abraham, from the Nile to the Euphrates.


There will be a new Temple, Ezekiel 40 to 46 is proof enough.
Zechariah 14:20 tells about the House of the Lord, where the Altar is. None other than the new Temple.
The Ark of the Covenant: there was an Ark, it was in Solomons Temple, then when the Babylonians conquered, it wasn't there any more. The Bible is silent about it, but the Maccabee's reference is quite probable for what happened to it and the rest of the Temple objects.
You see disaster approaching; what do you do with your treasures? Hide them! Just what the Israelites did, but according to God's plan, waiting for the Day when His faithful Christian people will migrate to live in His Land, being the people God always wanted there, but has never yet had. His witnesses, Isaiah 43:10, John 15:27 amd Hos Light to the nations, Isaiah 49:3-8, Matthew 5:14-16
The Temple will be built to God's glory and the Shekinah Glory will come, Ezekiel 43:1-4, into the Holy of Holies, where the original Ark will be.

Jordan will no longer be a nation then; Ezekiel 25:1-7, Amos 1:13-15, Jeremiah 49:1-2





I'm not sure why you think the Bible is silent on when the Ark was lost. Take a look at these passages.

There are two suspects: Pharaoh Shishek in the 900s BC and Nebuchadnezzar King of Babylon in the 500s BC.

In the fifth year of King Rehoboam, Shishak king of Egypt attacked Jerusalem. 26 He carried off the treasures of the temple of the Lord and the treasures of the royal palace. He took everything, including all the gold shields Solomon had made.
I Kings 14: 25-26 NIV

The Ark of the Covenant had gold all over it and it is obviously one of the treasures of the Temple, maybe the chief treasure. Second Chronicles repeats the same thing almost word for word.

9 When Shishak king of Egypt attacked Jerusalem, he carried off the treasures of the temple of the Lord and the treasures of the royal palace. He took everything, including the gold shields Solomon had made.
II Chronicles 12: 9 NIV

Then there is the other suspect, Nebuchadnezzar.

Jehoiachin king of Judah, his mother, his attendants, his nobles and his officials all surrendered to him. In the eighth year of the reign of the king of Babylon, he took Jehoiachin prisoner. As the Lord had declared, Nebuchadnezzar removed the treasures from the temple of the Lord and from the royal palace, and cut up the gold articles that Solomon king of Israel had made for the temple of the Lord.
II Kings 24:12-13 NIV

Again, we have the same story in Second Chronicles.

17 He brought up against them the king of the Babylonians,[g] who killed their young men with the sword in the sanctuary, and did not spare young men or young women, the elderly or the infirm. God gave them all into the hands of Nebuchadnezzar. 18 He carried to Babylon all the articles from the temple of God, both large and small, and the treasures of the Lord’s temple and the treasures of the king and his officials. 19 They set fire to God’s temple and broke down the wall of Jerusalem; they burned all the palaces and destroyed everything of value there.
II Chronicles 36: 17-19 NIV


For some reason, most historians seem to think the Ark was taken, or destroyed, by Nebuchadnezzar. I believe I've seen the date of 587 BC for this. As I pointed out above, it seems to me that Pharoah Shishek already took the "treasures of the temple," which has to include the Ark, hundreds of years earlier.

If the priests hid the Ark in a secret tunnel, the author(s) of II Kings and II Chronicles must be fibbing to us, because they don't know anything about it.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,161
1,223
71
Sebring, FL
✟657,505.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
No; many millions, a vast multitude, John see us in Jerusalem and the holy Land; Revelation 7:9, paralleled by Isaiah 66:18b-21
WE will occupy all that area given to Abraham, from the Nile to the Euphrates.


There will be a new Temple, Ezekiel 40 to 46 is proof enough.
Zechariah 14:20 tells about the House of the Lord, where the Altar is. None other than the new Temple.
The Ark of the Covenant: there was an Ark, it was in Solomons Temple, then when the Babylonians conquered, it wasn't there any more. The Bible is silent about it, but the Maccabee's reference is quite probable for what happened to it and the rest of the Temple objects.
You see disaster approaching; what do you do with your treasures? Hide them! Just what the Israelites did, but according to God's plan, waiting for the Day when His faithful Christian people will migrate to live in His Land, being the people God always wanted there, but has never yet had. His witnesses, Isaiah 43:10, John 15:27 amd Hos Light to the nations, Isaiah 49:3-8, Matthew 5:14-16
The Temple will be built to God's glory and the Shekinah Glory will come, Ezekiel 43:1-4, into the Holy of Holies, where the original Ark will be.

Jordan will no longer be a nation then; Ezekiel 25:1-7, Amos 1:13-15, Jeremiah 49:1-2



Keras, I notice that you point to Ezekiel Chapter 45 as evidence that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt, although you believe that it will be rebuilt by Christians. There are at least two problems here. As far as I know, all End Times theorists assume that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt on the Temple Mount.

Here is what the famous commentator John Gill says about the location of the Temple in Ezekiel 45:

"This temple was to be built at a distance from the city, several
miles; according to some ten, others twenty, and by the best account
twenty seven miles; see Eze 45:1-5, whereas Solomon's temple, and
that built by Zerubbabel, were in the city of Jerusalem ..."

One clue that this new Temple can't be on the Temple Mount is the spring that issues from the Temple. The second problem is sheer size.

No one seems to know what units of measurement Ezekiel is using but it is clear that this building is enormous. The size of this building is not credible.

Here is what the famous commentator John Gill says on about Ezekiel 45.

" ... that no material building can be designed is clear
from this one observation; that not only the whole land of Israel would
not be capable of having such a city as is here described built upon
it, but even all Europe would not be sufficient; nor the whole world,
according to the account of the dimensions which some give of it. The
circumference of the city is said to be about eighteen thousand
measures, Eze 48:35; but what they are is not certain. Luther
makes them to be thirty six thousand German miles; and a German mile
being three of ours, the circuit of this city must be above a hundred
thousand English miles; and this is sufficient to set aside all
hypotheses of a material building, either of city or temple, the one
being in proportion to the other."

Ezekiel's Temple probably has a spiritual meaning but as a blueprint it is too huge to be taken seriously. This is the passage that John Gill is trying to make sense of.

“When you allot the land as a possession, you shall set apart for the Lord a portion of the land as a holy district, twenty-five thousand cubits long and twenty thousand cubits broad; it shall be holy throughout its whole extent. 2 Of this a square plot of five hundred by five hundred cubits shall be for the sanctuary, with fifty cubits for an open space around it. 3 And in the holy district you shall measure off a section twenty-five thousand cubits long and ten thousand broad, in which shall be the sanctuary, the most holy place. 4 It shall be the holy portion of the land; it shall be for the priests, who minister in the sanctuary and approach the Lord to minister to him; and it shall be a place for their houses and a holy place for the sanctuary. 5 Another section, twenty-five thousand cubits long and ten thousand cubits broad, shall be for the Levites who minister at the temple, as their possession for cities to live in.
Ezekiel 45: 1-5 RSV

Twenty-five thousand cubits long? This is not a blueprint.
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,558
2,480
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟290,689.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Keras, I notice that you point to Ezekiel Chapter 45 as evidence that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt, although you believe that it will be rebuilt by Christians. There are at least two problems here. As far as I know, all End Times theorists assume that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt on the Temple Mount.

Here is what the famous commentator John Gill says about the location of the Temple in Ezekiel 45:

"This temple was to be built at a distance from the city, several
miles; according to some ten, others twenty, and by the best account
twenty seven miles; see Eze 45:1-5, whereas Solomon's temple, and
that built by Zerubbabel, were in the city of Jerusalem ..."

One clue that this new Temple can't be on the Temple Mount is the spring that issues from the Temple. The second problem is sheer size.

No one seems to know what units of measurement Ezekiel is using but it is clear that this building is enormous. The size of this building is not credible.

Here is what the famous commentator John Gill says on about Ezekiel 45.

" ... that no material building can be designed is clear
from this one observation; that not only the whole land of Israel would
not be capable of having such a city
as is here described built upon
it, but even all Europe would not be sufficient; nor the whole world,
according to the account of the dimensions which some give of it. The
circumference of the city is said to be about eighteen thousand
measures, Eze 48:35; but what they are is not certain. Luther
makes them to be thirty six thousand German miles
; and a German mile
being three of ours, the circuit of this city must be above a hundred
thousand English miles; and this is sufficient to set aside all
hypotheses of a material building, either of city or temple, the one
being in proportion to the other."

Ezekiel's Temple probably has a spiritual meaning but as a blueprint it is too huge to be taken seriously. This is the passage that John Gill is trying to make sense of.

“When you allot the land as a possession, you shall set apart for the Lord a portion of the land as a holy district, twenty-five thousand cubits long and twenty thousand cubits broad; it shall be holy throughout its whole extent. 2 Of this a square plot of five hundred by five hundred cubits shall be for the sanctuary, with fifty cubits for an open space around it. 3 And in the holy district you shall measure off a section twenty-five thousand cubits long and ten thousand broad, in which shall be the sanctuary, the most holy place. 4 It shall be the holy portion of the land; it shall be for the priests, who minister in the sanctuary and approach the Lord to minister to him; and it shall be a place for their houses and a holy place for the sanctuary. 5 Another section, twenty-five thousand cubits long and ten thousand cubits broad, shall be for the Levites who minister at the temple, as their possession for cities to live in.
Ezekiel 45: 1-5 RSV

Twenty-five thousand cubits long? This is not a blueprint.
You confuse the Land areas with the Temple. Ezekiel doesn't actually give the overall dimensions of the Temple, however we know them from 1 Kings 6:1-10......sixty cubits long, twenty cubits wide and thirty cubits high...….

Cubit; the distance from elbow to the fingers. Accurately determined as 18inches or 457 millimeters. Not a big building at all.

As for who will build it, the Bible does make that clear; All who love the Lord and follow in His ways, will live in His holy Land. They will build the 'fallen house'. Isaiah 58:12, Jeremiah 30:18, Zechariah 1:16
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Redwingfan9

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2019
2,629
1,532
Midwest
✟70,636.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
This is very true. However.. When the church is no longer here and the antichrist is ruling.... the bible states that the Jewish people will be following the old ways.. And, the antichrist will desecrate their holy of holys... Right?

These will be the people who are still waiting for their messiah... To them.. sacrifices are still necessary..

The temple will be built.. the sacrifices will resume... the ark's location ... ya... I bet they know.
I'm post-mil, the antichrist is never going to rule in the future.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JacksBratt

Searching for Truth
Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
16,282
6,482
62
✟570,596.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
The Orthodox Church says they have and the Catholics say they have it.
The Jews also think the Catholics have it.

Will the Ark ever be found?









https://www.history.com/news/fate-of-the-lost-ark-revealed


According to the Bible, Moses had the Ark of the Covenant built to hold the Ten Commandments at the command of God. The Israelites carried the Ark with them during their 40 years spent wandering in the desert, and after the conquest of Canaan, it was brought to Shiloh. King David later took the Ark to Jerusalem, where his son and successor, Solomon, eventually installed it in the temple. Since its disappearance, some 2,000 years ago, numerous theories have arisen about its fate. One of the most well known holds that Levitical priests moved the Ark to Egypt just before the Babylonians sacked Jerusalem in 586 B.C. From there it was supposedly moved to Ethiopia, where it resides to this day in the town of Aksum, in the St. Mary of Zion cathedral. Only one man, a monk known as “the Guardian,” is allowed to see the Ark, and church authorities have never allowed it to be studied to determine its authenticity.
Israel is a place of many wonders.... I'm sure they know it's whereabouts....but.... I am just as sure that they will never admit it.
 
Upvote 0