David Kent
Continuing Historicist
- Aug 24, 2017
- 2,173
- 663
- 86
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- UK-Conservative
Of course.The Earth is a pizza?
Upvote
0
Of course.The Earth is a pizza?
If the earth is flat, how thick is it and what is on the other side?
I'm really starting to believe that our Earth is really flat and not a globe like the world leads us to believe and need others thoughts on this as well.
In Genesus 1:6-9 we read (lets look at the word firmament and what it's really saying) and in verses 14,15,17 it's talking about the sun and moon and stars
6,And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
7,And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
8,And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day
9,And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry landappear: and it was so.
14,And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
15,And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
17,And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
There also been documentaries on earth being measured and found not to be round/globe as the world wants us to believe.
P.S copy and pasting from kjv blueletterbible thanks on any other thoughts on this.
Oh, so you take everything in Genesis as literal but decide not to do the same with Revelation!
Pick and choose what suits your beliefs?
That we are insignificant evolved monkeys
flying through space on a rock orbiting the sun and that there are endless galaxies etc.
That we are insignificant evolved monkeys flying through space on a rock orbiting the sun and that there are endless galaxies etc.
This is a good question... However, one man cannot answer. The deepest holes ever drilled were barely a dent in the crust... if there is a "crust".If the earth is flat, how thick is it and what is on the other side?
No, not from what I have heard... the planets are separate entities and created differently than the earth... moon and sun.Is the claim all planets flat?
The way it goes is this:So is they key word insignificant? That would seem counterproductive for the devil who would want us to be self centered. Insignificant is rather humbling. Although we also believe that our significances is not our own but in Christ who loves us and died for us.
Yep... and still to this day... not one experiment has proven that the earth moves or spins... in fact.... on of these experiments set out to prove such a thing failed... and is named as such a failure.After a few months, a baby begins to realize that the world is knowable and can be tested. As time goes on, that realization is repeatedly reinforced. It takes a great deal of intense indoctrination to get a human to reject evidence and rely on authority.
Which is why flat-Earthers are so often creationists and legalistically religious.
The way it goes is this:
Globe = random, insignificant, in the middle of nowhere, drifting aimlessly in a vast void of uncontrolled existence while the sun is the center.
FE = solid, significant, designed, purposeful, center of God's view and watch, not moving, and the focus of everything in the heavens.
None of that follows?None of that follows. Globe is not random at all but the result of gravitational forces just like every other celestial body, designed by God. Not driving aimlessly but on a prescribed and predictable orbit. I can't t argue vastness. Vast beyond understanding. And the sun is not the center either. Open your mind to our infinite God. Your univers is too small.
Yep... and still to this day... not one experiment has proven that the earth moves or spins... in fact.... on of these experiments set out to prove such a thing failed... and is named as such a failure.
Which model is more designed? Which is more random? Which is more planted and which is moving more aimlessly? Which one is more purposeful and which one is more aimless?
So, in comparison to a snow globe, sitting on pillars at Gods feet.....
So far, no one has been able to offer an explanation for the movement of a Foucault pendulum other than the Earth's rotation.
So far, no one has been able to offer an explanation for the Coriolis effect other than the Earth's rotation.
Not to mention the observed motion of the stars.
Yes, I got that one, plus the sudden slight change in the motion of stars after a very large Earthquake.
Foucault's Pendulum reverses direction during an eclipse... denies it being motivated by a rotation of the earth.So far, no one has been able to offer an explanation for the movement of a Foucault pendulum other than the Earth's rotation.
So far, no one has been able to offer an explanation for the Coriolis effect other than the Earth's rotation.
Of course... only NASA would be able to give proof of this...right?So far, no one has been able to offer an explanation for the fact that one can launch larger payloads into space when launching eastward close to the equator, other than the Earth's rotation.
Not proof of a rotation.. just a shift in the luminary movement attributed to a non measurable concept.So far, no one has been able to offer an explanation as to why a large earthquake very slightly changed the apparent movement of the stars immediately after, other than the Earth's rotation.
So far, no one has been able to offer any explanation as to the observed rotation of the Earth from the moon other than the Earth's rotation.
So far, no one has been able to offer any explanation for the direction of prevailing winds other than the Earth's rotation.
Now.. the speed of astronomical objects is proof of the spin of the earth... Really Barb... your grasping in a lot of these.. Not proof's... theories applied as grasping at straws.So far, no one has been able to explain the apparently faster-than-light speeds of various astronomical objects, other than the Earth's rotation.
Tides.... rotation... seriously? This is the simply moon and sun... maybe proof of gravity if anything.. not rotation.So far, no one has been able to explain the precise timing of the tides other than the Earth's rotation.
So far, no one has been able to explain the changes in the length of day other than by the Earth's rotation.
Check out the FE model... there are many explanations for the "observable facts".Which is in accordance with the observable facts?
If you think "God's footstool" can't be millions of light-years across, your view of God is too small.