Can you give me just one example. I gave you one where they sided with a Christian over a LGBT person.Youtube has a history of bias against conservative content has showed itself in various ways such as placing certain conservative content on it age restriction list with no real justification and disallowing the running of ads, and its implicit statements that its judgments will weigh favor of LGBT interests.
Can you give me just one example. I gave you one where they sided with a Christian over a LGBT person.
Hyberbolic language is good for saying alot in a few words. It assumes that certain facts are already known by adult readers. I of course did not mean that all speech is or will be banned.So....YouTube is banning all speech?
Only until he removes the link to his stores website where he sells pretty raunchy T-shirts.They reversed their decision with Crowder and demonetized his channel.
Clearly they sided with Carlos.
It is my understanding that it is temporary until he removes the link to his merchandise website.They reversed their decision with Crowder and demonetized his channel.
Clearly they sided with Carlos.
Socialism is for figs is raunchy?Only until he removes the link to his stores website where he sells pretty raunchy T-shirts.
Unfortunately conservatives fundies tend to act like they support abusing or even killing gays . I think that sort of speech deserves to be banned. There’s also the fact the the mainstream scientific community doesn’t think that being gay is unnatural and continually being treated as if you’re some type of freak is also a type of verbal or emotional abuse . I support that type of rhetoric being banned as well
Because it disagrees with you?Another bad comparison.
I don't support anyone using verbal abuse on anyone. There are people who are not conservative in the least that hate LGBT. You seem to think that all liberals side with them and all conservatives want to abuse them, you are just wrong.Unfortunately conservatives fundies tend to act like they support abusing or even killing gays . I think that sort of speech deserves to be banned. There’s also the fact the the mainstream scientific community doesn’t think that being gay is unnatural and continually being treated as if you’re some type of freak is also a type of verbal or emotional abuse . I support that type of rhetoric being banned as well
Prayer request vetoed by virtue of God's character.Official YouTube Blog: Our ongoing work to tackle hate
Google has initiated a furtherance of its ongoing policy of censoring and banning conservative and Christian content on its YouTube streaming service.
YouTube’s official blog states it is prohibiting “videos alleging that a group is superior in order to justify discrimination, segregation or exclusion based on qualities like age, gender, race, caste, religion, sexual orientation or veteran status.”
Of course their so called "hate speech" policy is partly guided by false presumptions pertaining to truth claims and competing worldviews. Such a broad outline is very subjective, and unless conservatives and Christians get serious in their prayers concerning a change in the Google’s leadership--as well as in its rank and file-- its employees will, in practice, interpret this in their usual biased fashion.
I would ask praying Christians everywhere to pray for a change in the leadership at Google/YouTube (and at other social media companies), and that any of its attempts to oppose the Christian worldview and agenda is disrupted and ultimately brought to absolutely nothing.
You posted an example?Can you give me just one example. I gave you one where they sided with a Christian over a LGBT person.
LOL You know that isn't what it says or he means, right?Socialism is for figs is raunchy?
You possess veto power? Him, I thought only Christ stood between man and GodPrayer request vetoed by virtue of God's character.
Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves (Philippians 2:3)
Think of it as an automatic veto, since Father God is not glorified by people pretending to be His people and being hateful towards others, when He has just as much justification to say the same about them .. but doesn't because of Jesus.You possess veto power? Him, I thought only Christ stood between man and God.
Hateful towards others? Hows that?Think of it as an automatic veto, since Father God is not glorified by people pretending to be His people and being hateful towards others, when He has just as much justification to say the same about them .. but doesn't because of Jesus.
If Father God is not glorified, in Jesus name is of no effect.
You're skirting close to violating the TOS. Indirectly attacking the person of members by attempting to de-Christianize them doesn't help your argument, such that it is.Think of it as an automatic veto, since Father God is not glorified by people pretending to be His people and being hateful towards others, when He has just as much justification to say the same about them .. but doesn't because of Jesus.
If Father God is not glorified, in Jesus name is of no effect.
Well, when you think of yourselves as "better than everyone else" you become like the Jews of Jesus' day who crucified Him who had an addiction to being told that they were better than everyone else.Hateful towards others? Hows that?