klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I am not sure, that is why I am asking for quotes from primary sources of those who teach it with links to check context.
Hebrews 8:13: "In speaking of 'a new covenant' he has made the first one obsolete."
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
9,641
7,850
63
Martinez
✟903,234.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I have an land line. How does that play videos?
Ok! Go to the link
Under the title to the far right are three dots ... If you click on that and select "open transcript" you can read the video. See it's possible!
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
9,641
7,850
63
Martinez
✟903,234.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok! Go to the link
Under the title to the far right are three dots ... If you click on that and select "open transcript" you can read the video. See it's possible!
You can also get a USB cord attach it to your computer and then to your TV.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Daniel Marsh said:
Please define Replacement Theology from primary sources of those who teach it with links to the texts being quoted, so the quotes can be checked in context.
The term "replacement theology" is a pejorative description. It is only used by those in opposition to the Church becoming Israel. It is typically used by Dispensational futurists.
Correct.
A good read of this covenantle parable should clear their misconceptions about that:

Lazarus and the Rich Man - Here a little, there a little - Commentary

Afterward, speaking primarily to his disciples but with the Pharisees (and probably the crowd) still listening in, Yeshua related the parable of the unjust steward (Luke 16:1-13). The Pharisees, who were "lovers of money" (Luke 16:14), realized that the Messiah was alluding to them with this parable and took offense. They scoffed at Yeshua. The final part of his response to the derision of the Pharisees and scribes was the parable of Lazarus and the rich man.

If the Pharisees and scribes understood Yeshua's prophetic parable, it must have astonished and infuriated them. How could the Jews become alienated from God while the elect Gentiles became the "seed of Abraham"? The implication that the House of Judah and those called from the Gentile nations were to change places would have been almost impossible for the Pharisees and scribes to believe.

LUKE 16:29 "Abraham said to him, 'They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.' "
Once again Abraham refuses the rich man's request, telling him that the brothers already have a witness in the writings of Moses and the prophets that will allow them to escape his fate. Moses, as well as the prophets, are shown several times in the New Testament to support Yeshua's identity as the Messiah (Luke 24:27, 44; John 1:45; 5:46; Acts 3:22-24; 7:37; 26:22-23; 28:23). Abraham tells the rich man that his brothers would have to recognize the prophesied Messiah because of the things written about him in the Tanakh. This echoes what Yeshua told the Jews in John's Gospel:

LUKE 16:30 "And he said, 'No, father Abraham; but if one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.' 31 But he said to him, 'If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.' "

But Abraham answers and plainly tells him that anyone who rejects the Bible's teaching about the Messiah will also refuse to acknowledge the evidence of a miraculous resurrection. This last verse is a sad prophecy about the Jews who, despite God's resurrection of His son from the power of the grave, have failed to recognize Yeshua as the prophesied Messiah.

CONCLUSION
The parable of Lazarus and the rich man, long used by mainstream Christian ministers to teach the "reality of hell," really has nothing to say about punishment or reward in the afterlife. Yeshua used this story, which fit the common misconception about life after death in his day, to show the fate that awaited the Jewish nation because of the unbelief and faithlessness which caused them to reject him as the Messiah. They still suffer from that fate to this very day. Yet the time is soon coming when God will pour on the Jews the Spirit of grace and supplication; then they will look on their Messiah whom they pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for his only son, and grieve for him as one grieves for a firstborn (Zec. 12:10).
=================================
fishing moses abraham cartoon.jpg
 
Upvote 0

Blade

Veteran
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2002
8,167
3,991
USA
✟630,767.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
" Gentiles have joined Jews that accept Christ through a grafting and Jews that don't accept Christ are removed/pruned from the tree they were born a part of".. <-----thats what it means!

Short is.. .. He show'd me a brown.. but ow so beautiful and dark brown tree..small. All the branches were "U" shaped.. TONS of branches. He said "show me a branch that was not originally of the vine. I am the vine you are the branches...

I always got stuck on what He told me. What was "originally" of the vine? I wondered Jews?

The Father has promised Israel many things. Israel may not be following Him.. "WE SAY" they are His people.. a people that do not believe. They are lost as any other people.. if they do not believe in Jesus the Messiah. Not replaced.. but what we have.. what we do.. was meant for them. Now it just makes this jealous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ewq1938
Upvote 0

Grip Docility

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2017
4,436
1,722
North America
✟83,880.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
" Gentiles have joined Jews that accept Christ through a grafting and Jews that don't accept Christ are removed/pruned from the tree they were born a part of".. <-----thats what it means!

Short is.. .. He show'd me a brown.. but ow so beautiful and dark brown tree..small. All the branches were "U" shaped.. TONS of branches. He said "show me a branch that was not originally of the vine. I am the vine you are the branches...

I always got stuck on what He told me. What was "originally" of the vine? I wondered Jews?

The Father has promised Israel many things. Israel may not be following Him.. "WE SAY" they are His people.. a people that do not believe. They are lost as any other people.. if they do not believe in Jesus the Messiah. Not replaced.. but what we have.. what we do.. was meant for them. Now it just makes this jealous.

Zechariah 3:10 In that day, saith Jehovah of hosts, shall ye invite every man his neighbor under the vine and under the fig-tree.

In Zechariah 3 the Vine (JESUS) is differentiated from the Fig Tree (Israel)

This explains why Paul begins the Tree analogy apart from the "Fig Tree"

Paul is using the appointment of the Apostolic church... brought forth by the (11)... of the 12... to signify the BOC, as the 11 were of "Israel" right up until "Penteost"? Mid Acts... ? Late Acts.... WHO Cares!?! Paul is then brought into the BOC for the Delivery of the Gospel to the Gentiles!!!!! He is nodding to the BOC's Jewish roots, by using the Olive Tree! :D

Don't get all argumentative about When it was official... (Acts 1... Mid... Late) ... Meh... It happened! Ta DA!


John 15 + Matthew 24:32 + Mark 11:12-25 + Romans 11 + Acts of the Apostles 1:6-7 + Acts of the Apostles 1:10-12 + Zechariah 14:1-6 (Especially Zechariah 14:4) ... Joel 2-3

Zechariah 3 is a shadow of Christ and it shows Christ's justification before God, as the Devil is Accusing Him, while He is literally Dressed in our Sins, before The Father.

Joshua is the true English way of saying (Jesus... which is the Greek transliteration)... as Yeshua is the Hebrew "Post Babylonian" way of saying Jesus... and YeHoshua is the Pre-Babylonian way of saying Jesus...

So... Check my work (Non Supersessionists)... Pretty Please

As you can see Ephesians 2:14-16 calls Christ the new Man, which vindicates that Paul is speaking about a NEW CREATION in the Grafting and Re-grafting, while Broken off ISRAEL literal is The FIG TREE.

Folks... This PROOFS, beyond a shadow of a doubt that The BOC is not Israel and Israel is not the BOC!

Check it, load it into Romans 11:13-24

Done deed!

All Love in our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, the NEW MAN, Head of the BOC and/but also King of Israel.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums