- Mar 3, 2006
- 33,112
- 11,338
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-American-Solidarity
I took logics 101, no need to be condescending.
And I've taught it no need to be defensive.
Upvote
0
I took logics 101, no need to be condescending.
Why is being unmarried a negative result of leaving an abuser? How is unemployment a result of freeing the slaves? Freeing the slaves opened up a ton of job opportunities. The slaves were unemployed and making slavery illegal forced men to pay them for their work.
I took logics 101, no need to be condescending.
I will certainly defend myself against unwarranted condescension.
I will certainly defend myself against unwarranted condescension.
Since when do husbands provide for their wives? It’s 2019. I make more $$ than my husband.If you advise someone to leave an abusive husband but you're not willing to provide for them the logic espoused here means you are not allowed to help then.
Also if you are not willing to provide someone an income by this logic you can not oppose freeing them from slavery even though it's horrible because they are fed.
It's the exact same thing as saying if you're not willing to take care of the child by adopting her you cannot oppose killing her.
Since when do husbands provide for their wives? It’s 2019. I make more $$ than my husband.
Freed slaves became employed laborers. (At least the ones who were actually freed.) The crops still needed to be attended.
Nevertheless, I understand your principle and am really only saying I disagree with your specific examples. So I’ll agree with your premise, now that I understand what it is.
As with many issues, people voice their support so long as it doesn't land in their backyard. The homeless shelter on their street, for example.
Another example is being against abortion but not adopting children, especially those from unwanted pregnancies.
I only know of one person to do it and he's one of the few people I can honestly say puts their money where their mouth is.
So, those of you against abortion, have you adopted? If not, why not?
So the father has a choice in the matter now?There are two people involved in pregnancies, and one is always a man.
No. We raised our own. My wife had a ring on her finger when she got pregnant and we raised our kids to be productive members of society. We did our part and if someone spreads her legs she had better be ready to do all the rest as well. If not, she is nothing more than a curse upon society.
Gaint straw man. the lack of focus to act against injustice doesn't void the injustice. if you recognize an imbalance then why aren't you fighting for it rather than pretending it's not there.As with many issues, people voice their support so long as it doesn't land in their backyard. The homeless shelter on their street, for example.
Another example is being against abortion but not adopting children, especially those from unwanted pregnancies.
I only know of one person to do it and he's one of the few people I can honestly say puts their money where their mouth is.
So, those of you against abortion, have you adopted? If not, why not?
You never know.Those Duggar's are obviously against abortion but I doubt they would be looking into adoption since they have 19 of their own un-aborted children.