- Jul 21, 2018
- 1,012
- 130
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
quoted from your post in "Replacement Theology Refuted"
I stopped reading when I came to that false statement.
Isaiah 8:20
To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
The law was with the first family
Disobientance occurred in the Garden with Eve and Adam, ie sin, they were removed and did not have access to the tree of life, therefor they died.
Cain offered a sacrifice that the Lord would not accept.
Cain Killed Able
1 John 3:4 [Full Chapter]
Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
so you see the law was always present with the human race and will be the instrument that we are judged by
John 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.
I’m wondering if you would be the right person to count on in vindicating the “little horn” in Daniel 8 is not Antiochus Epiphanies. Is there some oversensitivity concerning Galatians 3:17? I assure you I have firmly established in my mind Paul is speaking idiomatically about the codification of the law by the Mosaic covenant. Transgressions preceded the Mosaic covenant, verse 19, which means that God’s law predated Sinai. Joseph knew adultery was a sin in support, as well as many other texts.
You obviously did read the issue of compatibilism, which is observed in the book of Jonah. This in itself opposes any use of Jonah in support of conditional prophecy. Replacement theology cannot really be upheld in scripture, as the promises to Israel were based on the Abrahamic covenant, which was unconditional. The Mosaic covenant was merely the schoolmaster to teach them the need of Christ and cannot support that the prophecies and promises to Israel were conditional.
Last edited:
Upvote
0