New Zealand Cardinal asks laity to stop calling priests 'father' to fight 'clericalism'

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
166,342
56,056
Woods
✟4,656,462.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Monk Brendan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2016
4,636
2,875
72
Phoenix, Arizona
Visit site
✟294,430.00
Country
United States
Faith
Melkite Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Mark_Sam

Veteran Newbie
Mar 12, 2011
612
333
29
✟54,249.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
From the missive:
Being called “Father” may seem important to some priests, but is it really that important?
Yes. Yes it is. Spiritual fatherhood is at the core of the priesthood.
[...]the practice of calling us “Father” can be unhealthy because it becomes an expression of dependence which is based on a false and unreal idea of obedience.
My very soul depends on the Sarcaments of Confession and of the Eucharist. And only a priest can administer those. So I wouldn't call it an unhealthy dependence.
calling us “Father” makes our people act in such a way that people are put into a relationship of parent and child. It is not possible to have equal relationships between adults who are brothers and sisters if we call one of them “Father.”
Man, this dude (as I think His Eminence would prefer to be called) just keep missing the target. I don't want the priest to be my equal. I want him to act in persona Christi.

Fun fact: Here in Norway, we call our priests by the Latin pater. Actually, you're supposed to call (secular) priests pastor, as pater is reserved for the priests of religious orders. But no one follows this rule - we call all the priests pater. The Norwegian equivalent fader never really caught on, at least where I live.
 
Upvote 0

Bob Crowley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 27, 2015
3,053
1,893
69
Logan City
✟755,482.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I'm not going to criticise Cardinal Dew, but I will make a couple of comments. First of all he's echoing a French priest, Fr. Jean-Pierre Roche, who apparently wrote an article addressing the issue. Secondly Australians and New Zealanders are pretty casual when it comes to names - we'll most likely call our boss by his first name, and I wouldn't be surprised if that even applied to the police force.

That said, I sometimes think there's not enough formality these days. When I was Presbyterian, the pastor was a stickler for formality. I prefer "Bob", but he always said "Robert" which of course is my full name. And he expected his title to be used eg. Mr..... Mind you, he would return the favour and use the title of other people.

And he nearly always wore his clerical garb.

I never asked him about that, but I overheard someone asking him once why he always wore it, including the "dog collar". It's pretty hot in our climate for several months of the year, and with tight collar, no buttons, long sleeves and long trousers, it would not have been the most comfortable choice of clothing.

His reply in part - "... people know what I stand for...". Now if were to walk around town, I could quite possibly pass a priest and unless I happened to know him, I wouldn't have a clue what he stood for.

I think we need a bit more formality sometimes - not less.
 
Upvote 0