Girl knees boy in crotch during anti-trans Snapchat 'protest'

SummerMadness

Senior Veteran
Mar 8, 2006
18,201
11,829
✟331,677.00
Faith
Catholic
Girl expelled for kneeing boy in crotch during anti-trans Snapchat ‘protest’, family says
It all went down at North Pole High School in North Pole, Alaska – a small, Christmas-loving city just southeast of Fairbanks – on the morning of April 4. The Snap at issue: a student transitioning from female to male posted a selfie from the boys’ bathroom.

Some boys at the high school who saw the selfie, however, were angry, and decided they would walk into the girls' bathroom to take their own Snapchat selfie "as a form of protest," But they would not get far. The first boy to enter the girls’ room was met by a girl ― who kneed him in the groin. With that, the “protest” was over.
 

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,944
11,098
okie
✟214,996.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Sounds like the problem resolved itself.
Not at all.

THe selfish 'proud' one trying to show off that started it is still permitted to continue probably without being told what is wrong.
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,565
13,723
✟429,802.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
I don't condone what the boys did, but I do wonder if they would have even bothered to try to pull such a stunt if the atmosphere of "everyone use whichever bathroom they feel most comfortable in" hadn't already been in play at the school. I'm going to guess that this message made the boys think that their stunt would be an appropriate response to the 'offending' snapchat picture, even though the response they got showed that it obviously wasn't.

This must be such a confusing time to be a teenager. I have two people in my personal life who have struggled with transgender issues (one of which had surgery to present themselves as the sex they feel they are), so I try to be sensitive to that in any case, but at the same time I must be honest and say that I am glad that none of this existed when I was a teenager (which was not that long ago; I am only in my late 30s).

I hate to sound like an old man, but maybe things are changing too fast (socially/attitude-wise), and it is causing this kind of friction to reappear in various guises. It doesn't seem like many people are stopping to think whether or not it is actually a good idea to have a policy that is very 'loose' about bathroom usage, perhaps in fear that raising any question might get them labeled a 'transphobe' or some other neologism. I don't know if wanting to prevent situations like this one warrants that label. My gut says no, but again, this is a world I cannot even begin to relate to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JCFantasy23
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟982,622.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I wonder if the various abnormal people have problems with each other regarding going to the bathroom. For example would a hermaphrodite object if a trans wanted to share their bathroom, and so forth? Do we need to provide separate bathrooms for every abnormal gender? That could run into some money.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
24,790
13,357
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟367,433.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
While I disagree with the boys reacting like that. I DO have a problem with anyone taking pictures in a bathroom. Period.

I feel like an old fuddy duddy for saying it but yes, even in an empty bathroom; just doesn't suit the venue IMO....
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
37,578
11,396
✟437,300.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
While I disagree with the boys reacting like that.

I'm curious why? Generally speaking, I've seen a lot of support from the left regarding the ability to protest anywhere, at any time, regardless of the venue or who is using it at all that moment. I've even seen the justification that such protests are more effective.

What was it about this one that rubbed you the wrong way?
 
Upvote 0