What Minister or Christian teacher would you recommend? Why do you like them?

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,496
7,861
...
✟1,192,667.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Jesus.

Love. Pure and simple. Love of Our Lord and Saviour.

Right, I am a Sola Scriptura kind of Christian. I prefer the Lord and the Bible as my ultimate teacher. I think in these last days the more and more I listen to others, while there are some things we agree with, there are other things that I disagree with them on. No teacher I have run into today agrees with everything that I have learned from God's Word. The danger that we run into is that people tend to just blindly believe teachers nowadays and they don't check it with the Word of God.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,496
7,861
...
✟1,192,667.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why don't you try and respond to the actual verses I mentioned instead of coming up with whole set of new ones from your side? I am more than happy to address your verses and explain them, but if you are not willing to explain any of the verses I have put forth that refute your beliefs here, then there can be no real conversation. For if you continue to provide a one sided debate (with only you giving the verses) and ignore the verses I put forth, it would sort of be like stacking the deck in order for you to win.

So again, I ask you to explain the verses I have put forth, AND THEN I will explain the ones you mentioned.

Because I told you that there were too many to respond to.

Pick ONE. I will be glad to discuss ONE subject at a time. ONE Scripture at a time, but not 12.

In fact I will help you my brother. I believe you said that you said your #6 requirement was...…….
"The faithful saints who die in the Lord today go to Abraham's Bosom; after the Pre-Trib Rapture, saints who live after and die after this event will go directly to Heaven."

I believe that the Bible says that there is NO ONE in Abrahams Bosom/Paradise today.

Luke 16:19-31is the Scripture in which Jesus was teaching about the reality of heaven and hell.

“Abraham’s bosom” in this story is also translated “Abraham’s side” (NIV, ESV), “next to Abraham” (CEV), “with Abraham” (NLT), and “the arms of Abraham” (NCV).
These various translations speak to the enigmatic nature of the Greek word kolpos.

Jesus told the man on the cross in Luke 23:42...…..
‘I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in PARADISE".

Then in Ephesians 4:7-8 we see what happened to the saints in Abraham's bosom...……
"But to each one of us grace has been given as Christ apportioned it. This is why it says: "When he ascended on high, he took many captives and gave gifts to his people."

When Jesus ascended to heaven He took the Old Testament believers from Paradise with Him.

2 Corth. 12:2-4...………..
" I know a man in Christt who fourteen years ago was caught upu to the third heaven. Whether it was in the body or out of the body I do not know—God knows. to paradise and heard inexpressible things, things that no one is permitted to tell. "


2nd Corinthians 5:8...…….
“We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord.”

Hell is a literal place which burns with fire and brimstone for ever! Both Heaven and Hell are literal, physical, places. The Bible says that God and His Son sit upon thrones. A throne is a concrete item, not abstract. A throne can be touched and seen. Many people believe strange ideas about Heaven. It is a common belief that Heaven is not a literal place. I always capitalize the words Heaven and Hell, as is customary when naming proper places. Heaven and Hell are real places!!!

John 3:13...…….
And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.”


There you are...………..GO!
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,496
7,861
...
✟1,192,667.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Because I told you that there were too many to respond to.

Pick ONE. I will be glad to discuss ONE subject at a time. ONE Scripture at a time, but not 12.

In fact I will help you my brother. I believe you said that you said your #6 requirement was...…….
"The faithful saints who die in the Lord today go to Abraham's Bosom; after the Pre-Trib Rapture, saints who live after and die after this event will go directly to Heaven."

I believe that the Bible says that there is NO ONE in Abrahams Bosom/Paradise today.

Luke 16:19-31is the Scripture in which Jesus was teaching about the reality of heaven and hell.

“Abraham’s bosom” in this story is also translated “Abraham’s side” (NIV, ESV), “next to Abraham” (CEV), “with Abraham” (NLT), and “the arms of Abraham” (NCV).
These various translations speak to the enigmatic nature of the Greek word kolpos.

Jesus told the man on the cross in Luke 23:42...…..
‘I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in PARADISE".

Then in Ephesians 4:7-8 we see what happened to the saints in Abraham's bosom...……
"But to each one of us grace has been given as Christ apportioned it. This is why it says: "When he ascended on high, he took many captives and gave gifts to his people."

When Jesus ascended to heaven He took the Old Testament believers from Paradise with Him.

2 Corth. 12:2-4...………..
" I know a man in Christt who fourteen years ago was caught upu to the third heaven. Whether it was in the body or out of the body I do not know—God knows. to paradise and heard inexpressible things, things that no one is permitted to tell. "


2nd Corinthians 5:8...…….
“We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord.”

Hell is a literal place which burns with fire and brimstone for ever! Both Heaven and Hell are literal, physical, places. The Bible says that God and His Son sit upon thrones. A throne is a concrete item, not abstract. A throne can be touched and seen. Many people believe strange ideas about Heaven. It is a common belief that Heaven is not a literal place. I always capitalize the words Heaven and Hell, as is customary when naming proper places. Heaven and Hell are real places!!!

John 3:13...…….
And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.”


There you are...………..GO!

I said I don't want to debate the Abraham's Bosom issue if you didn't get it. Besides, even if I wanted to argue this point (Which I don't), you are also not explaining all of the verses I have already put forth. You are only offering your preferred verses to defend your viewpoint. You have to first address the verses that I brought forth if you want me to consider the verses you have said. If not, this will just be a one sided argument or debate.

Note: I am also not denying that Heaven and Hell are real literal places. I believe Christians (who die in the Lord) will go to Heaven AFTER the Pre-Trib Rapture. In other words, Abraham's Bosom will cease to exist after the Rapture happens.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I said I don't want to debate the Abraham's Bosom issue if you didn't get it. Besides, even if I wanted to argue this point (Which I don't), you are also not explaining all of the verses I have already put forth. You are only offering your preferred verses to defend your viewpoint. You have to first address the verses that I brought forth if you want me to consider the verses you have said. If not, this will just be a one sided argument or debate.

Note: I am also not denying that Heaven and Hell are real literal places. I believe Christians (who die in the Lord) will go to Heaven AFTER the Pre-Trib Rapture. In other words, Abraham's Bosom will cease to exist after the Rapture happens.

IF you do not want to debate Abraham's Bosom then why in the world did you list it as one of those things you had to believe.

The Bible fact is that there is NO ONE in Abraham's Bosom today so in fact there is nothing to discuss.

I agree, in that Hell is a real place. The argument you propose is Annialiation of the body and spirit when the lost get to hell and I am saying to you that the Bible teaches us that there will be ETERNAL TORMENT in the Lake of Fire forever and ever to the wicked lost.

So that is that.

I will let you pick one. What is that you would like to discusss now????
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost4words
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well, you appear to be under the impression that many have a correct knowledge of God. That is your opinion that I do not believe is supported by Scripture. I have been reading and studying the Bible for a very long time, and I believe most today do not have a proper knowledge of God's Word and they are not seeking to obey the Lord. How so? Well, Jesus says, "...when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?" (Luke 18:8). We are living in the last days, and many have a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof (See: 2 Timothy 3:1-9).

The Bible clearly teaches that after a person is saved by God's grace through Jesus Christ, holiness also plays a part in the next step or stage in the salvation process.
If not, then one can live like the devil and claim to be a servant of God (When they really are not).
Jesus said, you will know them by their fruits.

Please do not respond on this point within this thread. If you want to discuss it, start another thread, and if you provide a convincing argument with Scripture, I may reply.



Again, this is your opinion that is not supported by Scripture. Hell is a real place of torment (Psalms 139:8) (Matthew 5:28-30) (Luke 16:19-31); And the Lake of Fire (after the Judgment) will be a place where wicked men will be destroyed (2 Thessalonians 1:9) (2 Peter 2:6) (Psalms 68:2) (Job 4:8-9) (Psalms 92:7) (Psalms 1:6) (Matthew 10:28) (Revelation 21:8), and where wicked angels will be brought to nothing (Isaiah 14:12, Isaiah 14:19) (Ezekiel 28:14-15, Ezekiel 28:18) (Please hover your cursor over these verses to check them out).

In Isaiah 66:22-24, upon the final New Earth: The saints will will witness the lifeless remains or corpses of the wicked men that will be destroyed in the Lake of Fire that took place over several moons and sabbaths.

Revelation 21:8 says that the Lake of Fire is called the second death. The idea is that if you call it the "second death," it would have to be related to the "first death" (physical death) in some way in order to be a sequel or continuation of the first. If the second death is not really like the first death, then it would be called something else. In the first death, the physical body dies or perishes. In the second death, a newly created resurrected body (the resurrection of the damned) will be eventually be destroyed in the Lake of Fire.

In Matthew 10:28, Jesus says do not fear the one who can destroy the body, but fear the one who can destroy both body AND SOUL in Gehenna (i.e. the Lake of Fire).

1 Corinthians 15:26 says the last enemy to be destroyed is death. This means that there are other enemies of God that will be destroyed prior (like the devil and his minions, and wicked men who do not exactly follow Jesus in this life).

Please do not reply within this thread here; But start another thread if you are interested in debating this topic. Please take note that I may not respond if you have not presented a good argument or case for your position with the Bible.




Again, this is your opinion that is not supported by Scripture.
Check out the following thread link for a long list of verses.

Pacifism as Taught in the New Testament is Moral and Good.




So What Really Happened in Noah's Tent After the Flood?




I do not think you understand the moral problem in such a belief. You believe that God can ask a righteous man to join with an harlot. God condemns harlotry or prostitution. Why would he approve of prostitution by blessing such a sinful union. It makes no sense, unless one believes God can compromise on His goodness or morality. But God is holy. There is no darkness in God (1 John 1:5). I have talked about this on the forums before, but I would prefer not to debate this with you or others at this time. If you cannot see the obvious problem, I can only appeal you to ask the Lord why this is a problem.




God's people are destroyed for lack of knowledge (See Hosea 4:6).
"Let not then your good be evil spoken of:" (Romans 14:16).
"For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost." (Romans 14:17).
Also, the wine represented his blood.
Jesus's blood was pure and sinless.
Wine is fermented because of the yeast.
Yeast is a symbol of sin in the Bible.
Something that is dirty cannot clean anything.
Jesus's pure sinless blood cleanses all of mankind of their sins so as to offer him the free gift of eternal life (if they accept it and they are responsible with such a gift).

I am not really looking to debate this one with anyone at the moment. I have discussed this topic for hundreds of pages on multiple Christian forums before (Including this one). So I have debated this topic more than I care to. Unless you can offer something significant that has not been shared before, I am not really interested in debating this with anyone.




The Dead in Christ Are Taken From Abraham's Bosom By the Rapture:
(Both the Old Testament Saints and Church Age Saints in Abraham's Bosom Are Called to Rise To Meet the Lord in the Air. For in the Rapture: The Dead in Christ Shall Rise First):

Zechariah 9:11 NIV and 1 Thessalonians 4:16

For... I will free your prisoners from the waterless pit. And with the trump of God... the dead in Christ shall rise first:​

Click on the spoiler button to see my commentary on these two verses:

Commentary - Zechariah 9:11 and Thessalonians 4:16

Zechariah 9:11 is a prophetic Old Testament passage about the taking up of the saints from Abraham's bosom.

What is Abraham's Bosom?

Abraham's bosom (which is also known as Paradise) is described in Luke 16:19-31. It is a real place of comfort within the spirit realm; A temporary paradise where the saint's soul and spiritual body resides consciously to be with the Lord when their physical body dies (Genesis 3:19) (Ecclesiastes 12:7) (Luke 16:22). This paradise is located within the realm of the dead below the Earth (Which is also known as Sheol or Hades) which is separated by a great gulf from the fiery place of punishment known as "Torments" or what is commonly known as "Hell" (Luke 16:26) (Luke 16:23). It will be a place where the saint will be comforted (Luke 16:25). But, why is Abraham's bosom also called Paradise? Well, on the day of Christ's sacrifice, he had told the thief on the cross that: "This day, you shall be with me in Paradise" (Luke 23:43). But yet, Scripture tells us that when Christ died, he was in the heart of the Earth for three days and three nights, though (Matthew 12:40). So this leads us to conclude that during Christ's three days within the grave before His resurrection, He was with the thief in Abraham's bosom which is located in the heart (or the center) of the Earth.

Does Abraham's Bosom Still Exist Within the Church Age Today?

The real life story (or event) told by Jesus within Luke 16:19-31 took place during the time of Moses (Luke 16:29). However, the important question that must be asked is: Does Abraham's Bosom still exist today, though?

Well, yes, I believe according to the plain reading of Scripture that Abraham's bosom still exists today within our present church age. For all true saints who die in Christ right now will go to be with the Lord down in Abraham's bosom and then later they will be taken up into Heaven when the Rapture occurs. For how else will the dead in Christ rise first? See 1 Thessalonians 4:16. Do the dead in Christ rise to go to Heaven and then come back down somewhere temporarily to be risen again at the Rapture? Do they rise in Christ twice spiritually? If so, where is the verse that explains this?

In fact, many Christians today who are well versed in studying the Scriptures believe they go straight to Heaven; This is a common misconception because they interpret the ascension of Christ mentioned in Ephesians 4:8 as the time of when the saints in Abraham's bosom are being taken to Heaven.

Ephesians 4:8 - "When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive."

In other words, based on this passage, most Christians believe that Christ led those saints who were in captivity in Abraham's bosom captive up into Heaven when Christ ascended. However, is this what Ephesians 4:8 is talking about, though?

No, actually it is actually talking about how when Christ ascended, He bound the enemy or the powers of darkness. How so? Well, our first clue to this fact is to look at the parallel reference of this passage located in Judges chapter five.

Judges 5:12 - "Awake, awake, Deborah: awake, awake, utter a song: arise, Barak, and lead your captives captive, you son of Abinoam."

Now, without boring you with all the details, to make a long story short, if you were to read Judged chapter 5, you would find out that Barak was leading his enemies captive and not his friends. To put it to you another way, the moment a true Christian is born again and then dedicates their life to Christ, they are then no longer Christ's enemy. For those in Abraham's bosom are God's elect or chosen who had put their trust in God to redeem them of their sins (See Luke 16:19-31).

As a matter of fact, Gill's Exposition of the Bible says this...
"He led captivity captive; which is expressive of Christ's conquests and triumph over sin, Satan, the world, death, and the grave; and indeed, every spiritual enemy of his and his people, especially the devil, who leads men captive at his will, and is therefore called captivity, and his principalities and powers, whom Christ has spoiled and triumphed over;"And 2nd Timothy says this...

2 Timothy 2:26 - "And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will. For when Christ had raised from the dead he put all things including the principalities and powers of darkness under his feet."

Therefore, the word "captivity" is a reference to Satan leading people captive to his will and lets us know the true context or meaning behind Ephesians 4:8.

For when Christ had risen from the dead, He put all things including the principalities and powers of darkness under his feet.

Ephesians 1:20-23 "Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church, Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all."

Again, this is a topic I am not looking to debate a person on. If you don't get it, all I can say is for you to pray to the Lord about it.

I will try and reply to the rest of what you had written later.

I have no desire to ARGUE with you, You are free to believe as you wish to believe. All I can do is show you Scriptures that challenge your understanding.

You said...……...…...….
Pacifism as Taught in the New Testament is Moral and Good

First of all, lets define was a Pacifist is. A pacifist is someone who is opposed to violence, especially war, for any purpose. A pacifist often refuses to bear arms for reasons of conscience or religious conviction.

Yes, Jesus is the “prince of peace” in that He will one day bring true and lasting peace to the earth. And His message in this world was remarkably non-violent.

But the Bible is clear that sometimes war is necessary.
And, given some of the Bible’s prophecies of Jesus, IMO, it is hard to call Him a pacifist.

Revelation 19:15 speaking of Jesus, declares......
“Coming out of his mouth is a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations.

Rev. 19:13 says...……...
‘He will rule them with an iron scepter.’ He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty.”

The setting up of Jesus’ millennial kingdom will necessitate violence in the form of a war waged against the forces of the A/C.

Rev. 19:13 also says that .....
Jesus’ robe will be “dipped in blood”!

I would also remind everyone that Jesus’ disciples owned weapons, which conflicts with the idea that Jesus was a pacifist or that pacifism is a New Test. teaching.

In Luke 22:37-39 On the night Jesus was betrayed, He even told His followers to bring swords. They had two, which Jesus claimed was enough.

In John 18:10.....As Jesus was being arrested, Peter drew his sword and wounded one of the men present. Jesus healed the man in Luke 22:51 and commanded Peter to put away his weapon. Of note is the fact that Jesus did not condemn Peter’s ownership of a sword, but only his particular misuse of it.

Then you said in in post #1 of your post...…...
What Really Happened in Noah's Tent After the Flood?


So when Genesis 9:22 says,

"And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, "

It is saying that the nakedness of his father (Noah) was Noah's wife.
It is talking about Noah's wife!
Gen 9:22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without."

You have stated that you are a believer in Sola Scriptura but then you turn around and say..................
"It is saying that the nakedness of his father (Noah) was Noah's wife.
It is talking about Noah's wife!"


NO IT IS NOT SAYING ANY SUCH THING! What you have said is utter nonesense.

The Scripture says.............
"And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, "

YOU are ADDING what someone has told you instead of just believing what the Word of God actually says. YOU are guilty of making the Bible say what YOU WANT IT TO SAY which is the opposite of Sola Scriptura my dear brother.

YOUR view arises out of comparison with Leviticus 20:11...……….

"The man who lies with his father's wife has uncovered his father's nakedness..."

What you have stated with Leviticus 20:11 in mind, is not something new you just thought up. That false teaching goes way back in history my friend.


Some in the past have speculated that Ham had sex with Noah's wife, and that was what brought the curse from Noah. However, this figurative understanding of "uncovering nakedness" fails to account for the fact that Shem and Japheth walked into the room backward and covered Noah with a garment. This does not make any sense if "uncovering nakedness" means "having sex with Noah's wife." It definitely seems that Noah was lying naked—his nakedness uncovered.

At this point Jason, Because your comments seem to be more fairy tales and speculation than REAL Bible Scriptures, I am withdrawing from the conversation with you.

Blessing to you and I hope that you will grow in the knowledge and faith of our Lord Jesus Christ and His precious Word.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,496
7,861
...
✟1,192,667.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
IF you do not want to debate Abraham's Bosom then why in the world did you list it as one of those things you had to believe.

The Bible fact is that there is NO ONE in Abraham's Bosom today so in fact there is nothing to discuss.

I agree, in that Hell is a real place. The argument you propose is Annialiation of the body and spirit when the lost get to hell and I am saying to you that the Bible teaches us that there will be ETERNAL TORMENT in the Lake of Fire forever and ever to the wicked lost.

So that is that.

I will let you pick one. What is that you would like to discusss now????

First, Biblical wisdom teaches us that there are some things in the Bible that are not worth debating over so as to cause divisions.

Second, you are not my master. I don't have to pick one. I would prefer that you respond to the topics I want responded to, but you have free will choice to decide on whether or not to do that. I am not going to tell you what to do. It is your choice to respond or not.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,496
7,861
...
✟1,192,667.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
NOW that is something I agree with.

I am glad. But everyone has their own interpretation on what the Bible says. Many of the time these interpretations are man centered or self centered. For example: Somebody who obviously believes in a sin and still be saved gospel because it makes for an allowance that they can sin on occasion (without worrying about the consequences of their status with the Lord). In other words, there is something in it for them personally in a wrong way and not in a selfless way.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,496
7,861
...
✟1,192,667.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I have no desire to ARGUE with you, You are free to believe as you wish to believe. All I can do is show you Scriptures that challenge your understanding.

A person can argue with Scripture. That is what I was referring to.
You also did not in any way challenge the verses that I put forth.
You put forth a new set of verses and ignored the ones I posted.
But again, I do not want to debate the Abraham's Bosom issue with you because it is a minor issue that is not worth causing divisions over.

You said:
You said...……...…...….
Pacifism as Taught in the New Testament is Moral and Good


First of all, lets define was a Pacifist is. A pacifist is someone who is opposed to violence, especially war, for any purpose. A pacifist often refuses to bear arms for reasons of conscience or religious conviction.

Yes, Jesus is the “prince of peace” in that He will one day bring true and lasting peace to the earth. And His message in this world was remarkably non-violent.

But the Bible is clear that sometimes war is necessary.
And, given some of the Bible’s prophecies of Jesus, IMO, it is hard to call Him a pacifist.

Revelation 19:15 speaking of Jesus, declares......
“Coming out of his mouth is a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations.

Rev. 19:13 says...……...
‘He will rule them with an iron scepter.’ He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty.”

The setting up of Jesus’ millennial kingdom will necessitate violence in the form of a war waged against the forces of the A/C.

Rev. 19:13 also says that .....
Jesus’ robe will be “dipped in blood”!

I would also remind everyone that Jesus’ disciples owned weapons, which conflicts with the idea that Jesus was a pacifist or that pacifism is a New Test. teaching.

In Luke 22:37-39 On the night Jesus was betrayed, He even told His followers to bring swords. They had two, which Jesus claimed was enough.

In John 18:10.....As Jesus was being arrested, Peter drew his sword and wounded one of the men present. Jesus healed the man in Luke 22:51 and commanded Peter to put away his weapon. Of note is the fact that Jesus did not condemn Peter’s ownership of a sword, but only his particular misuse of it.

My apologies. I inaccurately defined the word.
You are correct, I am not a Pacifist who is against all forms of war.
I believe that the wars commanded by God in the Old Testament were justified, and that there will be an upcoming future battle with Christ returning to destroy the Earth's nations that come up against Him. But as for now: Under the New Covenant in living out our faith, we are commanded to be nonresistant.

I have renamed the thread and the OP to say:

Nonresistance as Taught in the New Testament is Moral and Good

I posted the link so as to debate the topic there and not here. If you want to debate the topic within the thread, then please read the OP and respond in explaining the verses and points I posted. Most of what you said here has been addressed in the thread.

Then you said in in post #1 of your post...…...
What Really Happened in Noah's Tent After the Flood?


So when Genesis 9:22 says,

"And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, "

It is saying that the nakedness of his father (Noah) was Noah's wife.
It is talking about Noah's wife!
Gen 9:22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without."

You have stated that you are a believer in Sola Scriptura but then you turn around and say..................
"It is saying that the nakedness of his father (Noah) was Noah's wife.
It is talking about Noah's wife!"


NO IT IS NOT SAYING ANY SUCH THING! What you have said is utter nonesense.

The Scripture says.............
"And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, "

YOU are ADDING what someone has told you instead of just believing what the Word of God actually says. YOU are guilty of making the Bible say what YOU WANT IT TO SAY which is the opposite of Sola Scriptura my dear brother.

YOUR view arises out of comparison with Leviticus 20:11...……….

"The man who lies with his father's wife has uncovered his father's nakedness..."

What you have stated with Leviticus 20:11 in mind, is not something new you just thought up. That false teaching goes way back in history my friend.


Some in the past have speculated that Ham had sex with Noah's wife, and that was what brought the curse from Noah. However, this figurative understanding of "uncovering nakedness" fails to account for the fact that Shem and Japheth walked into the room backward and covered Noah with a garment. This does not make any sense if "uncovering nakedness" means "having sex with Noah's wife." It definitely seems that Noah was lying naked—his nakedness uncovered.

This is not a topic I want to debate. It is a nonessential truth in Scripture that is not worth dividing the body over. If you don't get it, I cannot help you. All I ask is that you pray to the Lord on it (just in the event that you feel that you are not the sole arbiter of truth).

You said:
At this point Jason, Because your comments seem to be more fairy tales and speculation than REAL Bible Scriptures, I am withdrawing from the conversation with you.

Well, that is your opinion that I do not share.

You said:
Blessing to you and I hope that you will grow in the knowledge and faith of our Lord Jesus Christ and His precious Word.

Blessings to you in the Lord, as well.
 
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
22,524
8,427
up there
✟306,518.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
This is why there are so few ministers or teachers worth listening to. Jesus said to put the will of the Father ahead of our own, love all as self and forward the Gospel of the Kingdom. Quite simple if you do what God wants instead of arguing over what man deems important. God's word or man's religion... depends on which you follow I guess.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Major1
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes sir...…...one of the all time best!
Hi major,

Yes, I still listen to his messages on oneplace.com He's gone to be with the Lord now, but I've always found his messages a bit humorous and always straight from the word.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hi major,

Yes, I still listen to his messages on oneplace.com He's gone to be with the Lord now, but I've always found his messages a bit humorous and always straight from the word.

God bless,
In Christ, ted

You are very correct.!!!!!
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,564
18,498
Orlando, Florida
✟1,257,433.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Politics
US-Democrat
I would recommend evangelicals in the US read more Philip Yancey or Brennan Manning. It is a message they need to hear, and unlike us Lutherans, they speak in terms that American evangelicals can understand readily.

Of people who've published works you could source, Rowan Williams would have to top my list. I've never read anything of his that I didn't find helpful.

I agree. I think he also speaks and writes very plainly in ways that anyone can understand, while not oversimplifying things. I especially appreciated reading The Body's Grace years ago when I was trying to look for an approach beyond authoritarian legalism, and long before I became Lutheran and could articulate intellectually what I intuitively understood as a broken system. Whereas our own approach as Lutherans can be obtuse and obscure at times.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Jonathan Mathews

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2015
785
449
39
Indianapolis
✟33,461.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
What Minister or Christian teacher would you recommend?

Why do you like them?

NOTE: I don't agree with everything these men say or do but...

1) Paul Washer for his Gospel
2) John Piper for his wisdom
3) John MacArthur for his Knowledge
4) Gino Jennings for his holiness
5) TB Joshua for his prophecy
6) Derek Prince for his spiritual warfare
7) Chuck Missler for his end times eschatology
8) Kent Hovind for his biblical Creation Science
9) Ron Wyatt for his Bible Archaeology
 
Upvote 0