- Dec 31, 2018
- 22,550
- 8,436
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
Depends which party is in power.I thought you were talking about government persecution/exclusion/banning
Upvote
0
Depends which party is in power.I thought you were talking about government persecution/exclusion/banning
Fair enough. What then do you think the terrorism accusation is built upon?
What they say may be much the same but what they do is very different. Jehovah's witnesses doi not have political power and cannot use the engines of state to oppress their opponents.Is that somehow different from what the JWs say about the Russian Orthodox Church?
What they say may be much the same but what they do is very different. Jehovah's witnesses doi not have political power and cannot use the engines of state to oppress their opponents.
The best way to deal with Jehovah's witnesses is to expose their actual practises, especially with regard to shunning and family break up in relation to shunning. A public information campaign would be far more effective then direct persecution. Just tell the truth about what they do and fail to do and that will help inoculate many of the public to resist their enticements to join.
What they say may be much the same but what they do is very different. Jehovah's witnesses doi not have political power and cannot use the engines of state to oppress their opponents.
The best way to deal with Jehovah's witnesses is to expose their actual practises, especially with regard to shunning and family break up in relation to shunning. A public information campaign would be far more effective then direct persecution. Just tell the truth about what they do and fail to do and that will help inoculate many of the public to resist their enticements to join.
Christians are not generally persecuted in Christian-majority nations, with the exception of Eritrea (they illegally deposed the national Church's patriarch and installed a government puppet, but I can't say anything about what is put upon the average Christian of that country, since I don't know anyone who actually lives there).
JWism is not a form of Christianity.
Russia is not exactly friendly to non-Orthodox Christians. I watched a documentary some time ago about Lutherans in Russia. It's a very difficult situation, because Russia is currently enthralled with ethno-nationalism, and the idea of German-Russians with a Protestant faith goes against that.
But when state power is used short of genocide it fails. The pagan Romans tried it against Christians and look what happened. The crusaders tried it against Muslims and see what happened. The inquisition tried it against Jews and Muslims in Spain and look at what happened. None of those efforts was a success.If we look to Christian history, the Church has always used the power of the State to prohibit and check heresy.
It probably would be seen as state sponsored anti-Jehovah's-witnesses information or propaganda if the state funded it or produced it. But if what was presented is true then it would be educational just like teaching in the schools is educational despite being funded by government and produced by government. It is far better to inform than it is to persecute.While I agree with you that this is the better way (and this has been the Coptic Orthodox Church's approach to dealing with them in Egypt, where HH Pope Shenouda III gave several talks against them and wrote against them after they began to be noticed by Coptic people; they had been banned by the secular government of Nasser in 1960), how would it also not meet the same charges of government collusion if the government were seen to be behind and/or cooperating with the Church in disseminating this information, as it surely would?
Jehovah's witnesses are harmless as long as members do not question official teaching. The moment that they do they become "apostate" and will be shunned. There is a film out of the UK called Apostate, made in 2107, about what happens with shunning. The film also touches on what happens what one of Jehovah's witnesses in need of a blood transfusion refuses it on religious grounds. For such people they are not harmless and shunning is a very cruel form of "restorative punishment".Jehovah's Witnesses are totally harmless to the well being
I don't see how the church would be involved in a government information campaign.So in other words people would still complain that this is the state and the Church colluding to oppress a minority.
For such people they are not harmless and shunning is a very cruel form of "restorative punishment".
It is not extreme but it is bad. Shunning family members simply because they question Watchtower teaching is bad.Would that be an extremist view of this? Luke 12:51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: 52 For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. 53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
Oh my brother ..How should he deal with what ? His own sin before God ???? If he has the power of the Holy Ghost as Peter did with Ananias and Sapheira , he can say a word and the Holy Ghost may drop them dead . Or he may blind them for a season as Paul did ...But if he is just another very devout and zealous religious leader believing that his version of orthodoxy is the same as the first century church but he himself lacks the power , he should repent ...for he is a great sinner and should show the same mercy that he hopes of God .If we look to Christian history, the Church has always used the power of the State to prohibit and check heresy. The "persecution" the Church has been accused of in the past is an example. That people were executed for heresy, often in the most brutal ways, was not an invention of Christianity, but was merely the routine enforcing of blasphemy laws. Blasphemy and heresy were felonies and those convicted of it were treated as any other felon, as all felonies carried the death penalty.
None of that should come as any surprise whatever to anyone who has ever read the bible, as the bible says of Jesus:
Rev 12:5 - And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron...
And of those such as Patriarch Kiril:
Rev 2:26 - And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
Rev 2:27 - And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.
We now come to true heart of the matter, that being the good that Christianity has brought to the world, and the unsurprising belief of Christianity that those who fall away, fail away into eternal damnation. How should the Church have dealt with those who would end the good of Christianity or cause a Christian to fall away? And now, how should Patriarch Kiril deal with those same people today? With the stakes being that high, any Shepherd of God's sheep would bring whatever power they could possibly bring to prevent it.
It is not extreme but it is bad. Shunning family members simply because they question Watchtower teaching is bad.
Did the early followers of Christ confiscate property, arrest members, imprison them, outlaw religions? That is what is happening in Russia with respect to Jehovah's witnesses. Far better to educate the populace to be aware of the policies of Jehovah's witnesses with regard to shunning and demands of absolute obedience to the dictates of the organisation rather than arrest, imprison, and confiscate property.Early followers of Jesus were thus separated, not just by distance but by the Kingdom.