Anyone who watched this recently conducted debate? Any thoughts?
Pretty deceptive for Mohammed Hijab to deny that Salah Ala and Salah Alay both mean pray, although sure both have different meanings within their context, both however can’t be used unless your trying to spread the message of someone praying for something or someone praying in general. So if it does simply mean blessings as Mohammed Hijab try’s to make it look like to escape the argument why is Allah the only one worth of praise praising Mohammed? Infact why is God telling Mohammed peace be upon you? I mean seriously, Muslims think please I beg you think a bit by yourselves instead of letting your Ulema think for you.
Anyone who watched this recently conducted debate? Any thoughts?
Which part isn’t? I don’t even know which verse to quote to you given the number of them:Except that it isn't.
The parts about the insults and the threats.Which part isn’t? I don’t even know which verse to quote to you given the number of them:
Qur'an, Hadith and Scholars:Hell - WikiIslam
Most of the Quran is based around that, those parts make up the majority of the Quran that’s not even half of all the disturbing Quranic verses describing torture in hell.The parts about the insults and the threats.
What number of quotes do you think are sufficient to substantiate your allegation that "pretty much the entire Quran is about insulting other people’s deities or gettin threatened with excruciating torture in hell"?
So you say that "most of the Quran" is based around that, but all you've got to back up your claim is material that has to look outside the Quran to make it's case? How many actual quotes do you have from the Quran itself in support of your position?Most of the Quran is based around that, those parts make up the majority of the Quran that’s not even half of all the disturbing Quranic verses describing torture in hell.
The material I quoted has all the Quran verses listed, did you even read the link?So you say That "most of the Quran" is based around that, but all you got to back up your claim is material has to look outside the Quran to make it's case? How many actual quotes do you have from the Quran itself in support of your position?
Why would I waste my time if you can't be honest about the number of verses which support your position?The material I quoted has all the Quran verses listed, did you even read the link?
I already posted all the verses which are on the link, at this point your only replying to me back for the sake of replying. The link has all the verses in the Quran so please stop replying to me if you won’t read the link.Why would I waste my time if you can't be honest about the number of verses which support your position?
No, the point is to make sure people know why you are avoiding of dishonesty regarding your allegations against the Quran, specifically the disconnect between "most of the Quran" and the number of verses from your link.I already posted all the verses which are on the link, at this point your only replying to me back for the sake of replying. The link has all the verses in the Quran so please stop replying to me if you won’t read the link.
The number of verses are numerous and there are many more that make up the majority of the Quran so please stop replying to my posts if you don’t really have anything relevant to say.No, the point is to make sure people know why you are avoiding of dishonesty regarding your allegations against the Quran, specifically the disconnect between "most of the Quran" and the number of verses from your link.
And we should just take your word for it, right? It's obvious that you are lying to prop up the hole in your argument: that the number of verses in you referenced text isn't remotely close to a majority of verses from the Quran.The number of verses are numerous and there are many more that make up the majority of the Quran so please stop replying to my posts if you don’t really have anything relevant to say.
Take the Quran's word for it and read it, please stop replying to my comments if you have nothing relevant to say. And stop accusing me of things, thank you.And we should just take your word for it, right? It's obvious that you are lying to prop up the hole in your argument: that the number of verses in you referenced text isn't remotely close to a majority of verses from the Quran.
The first seven verses don't support you.Take the Qurans word for t and read it
READ WHAT"S IN THE LINK.And we should just take your word for it, right?
You do understand the meaning of majority right, this verse itself has a threat of punishment, for those who are misguided meaning Christians or Nasara and those of whom there is anger the Jews or Yahoud. Those who are not blessed in Islam are cursed to hellfire. Because if your blessed your a Muslim. Sarah Al Fatiha precisely supports my position please don't teach me a Surah which I was required to memorise every night before bed by my parents. Let me repeat, stop replying to me if you have nothing relevant to say.The first seven verses don't support you.
1. In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
2. Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds.
3. The Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
4. Master of the Day of Judgment.
5. It is You we worship, and upon You we call for help.
6. Guide us to the straight path.
7. The path of those You have blessed, not of those against whom there is anger, nor of those who are misguided.
Quran in English - Clear and Easy to Read.
How many other will you ignore before you find one that you think supports your "majority" lie?
Yes, it's what you call a minority.You do understand the meaning of majority
this verse itself has a threat of punishment
for those who are misguided meaning Christians or Nasara
What utter tosh.Those who are not blessed in Islam are cursed to hellfire.
Sarah Al Fatiha precisely supports my position