That's not the excuse you gave in post #13. Are you fishing for answers? The Father and Son are not 3 entities even in Mormonism. Wake up and pay attention please.
"In 1834-35, during the Kirtland, Ohio period, Joseph Smith made a major departure from the Book of Mormon emphasis that the Father and Son are the same person. While still apparently maintaining that there is only one God (monotheism), he began to teach that there are two persons within the Godhead — the Father and the Son. Theologians call this 'binitarianism.' This second stage in Joseph's teaching regarding Deity is spelled out in the 'Lectures on Faith.' These seven 'lectures on theology' were approved for inclusion in the Doctrine and Covenants by a Conference vote of the LDS Church on August 17, 1835. They appeared in all English editions of the D&C until their unexplained removal in 1921 without a General Conference vote.
9 Lecture Five explicitly teaches that there are two persons in the Godhead:
"There are two personages who constitute the great, matchless, governing and supreme power over all things — by whom all things were created and made . . . They are the Father and the Son: The Father being a personage of spirit, glory and power: possessing all perfection and fullness: The Son, who was in the bosom of the Father, a personage of tabernacle, made and fashioned like unto man.
"A question and answer section in Lecture Five confirms its binitarian view of the God:
"Q. How many personages are there in the Godhead?
A. Two: the Father and the Son."
Joseph Smith's Changing Doctrine of Deity
Another link:
Lectures on Faith
Isaiah 28:9-10 King James Version (KJV)
9 Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts.
10 For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little:
Isaiah tells us that the fullness of the knowledge of God cannot be given in one setting.
We must learn precept upon precept, line upon line, here a little, there a little.
Why must we learn this way? Because of what happened to Paul, in Corinth. He tried to feed them meat, when the Corinthians were not even able to live by the milk. He gave them the milk concept, but he knew they were not able to receive the meat concept, so he did not even give it.
The BOM confirms what Isaiah says:
2 Nephi 28:29-30
29 Wo be unto him that shall say: We have received the word of God, and we need no more of the word of God, for we have enough!
30 For behold, thus saith the Lord God: I will give unto the children of men line upon line,
precept upon precept, here a little and there a little; and blessed are those who hearken unto my precepts, and lend an ear unto my counsel, for they shall learn
wisdom; for unto him that
receiveth I will give
more; and from them that shall say, We have enough, from them shall be taken away even that which they have.
Nephi is confirming what Isaiah taught, that we are given line upon line, precept upon precept and if we receive it,
I the Lord will give more.
Do you want more, or do you want to be like the Corinthians?
So finally to answer your question.
JS did not learn everything about the Father and the Son in one meeting. He learned about their nature precept upon precept, line upon line, here a little, there a little. So he very well could have written at times, what he knew about the Godhead, and then later learned more and later more. Do you think he thought to himself, wow, the people aren't going to believe me, because I have already said X about this subject. No, he pressed on, and adjusted his written word to correlate with his new knowledge.
So the idea that the nature of the Godhead could have changed during JS lifetime and beyond is not a proof that the prophets are false, but a truth that they are like Isaiah and Nephi, learning precept upon precept, line upon line, here a little, there a little, and as they did the Lord gave them more information about Himself and the Godhead.
Do we now know everything there is to know about God? I hope you understand that the answer is NO. And why do we not know everything about God, because we would not be able to receive it. We must learn milk before we get meat. And meat before we get the full dinner and dessert.
Eventually we will know all about God.