Seems those voting in the poll disagree.
So that part is obvious.
Did they read and engage the argument from the article remains very much to be seen.
It seems like as Christians affirming life is a straightforward issue, one where we could agree. Yet 7 SC justices created a new federal law in the 1973 Roe v Wade decision.
As justice White described it:
"I find nothing in the language or history of the Constitution to support the Court's judgment. The Court simply fashions and announces a new constitutional right for pregnant women and, with scarcely any reason or authority for its action, invests that right with sufficient substance to override most existing state abortion statutes. The upshot is that the people and the legislatures of the 50 States are constitutionally disentitled to weigh the relative importance of the continued existence and development of the fetus, on the one hand, against a spectrum of possible impacts on the woman, on the other hand. As an exercise of raw judicial power, the Court perhaps has authority to do what it does today; but, in my view, its judgment is an improvident and extravagant exercise of the power of judicial review that the Constitution extends to this Court."
Limiting this type of judicial activism seems more than prudent.
We are at over 40 million babies aborted as a result of 7 justices affirming a right that is no where in the constitution.
So my hope is that people engage intellectually with the material rather than "Just voting."
