The Ark Hive Mind
The Ark Hive
I thought it was called 'practice'.The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
Upvote
0
I thought it was called 'practice'.The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
No practice is doing it over and over again and improving. Alas I am not seeing that in some of these posts.I thought it was called 'practice'.
You might have to explain that definition to some 'sports' teams or 'rap artists'. They 'practice', but maybe they don't have your definition.No practice is doing it over and over again and improving. Alas I am not seeing that in some of these posts.
The evidence in favor of the last 12 verses of Mark's Gospel is overwhelming.
Even the copier who produced Vaticanus recognized something was missing and left room for the last 12 verses. It was not uncommon for the last several verses of a papyrus or vellum scroll to be missing as, when it was rolled up, the very end of the manuscript would be the outermost layer of the roll and was more likely to be damaged.
Photo of the last pages of Mark in Vaticanus.
View attachment 230332
The evidence in favor of the last 12 verses of Mark's Gospel is overwhelming.
Even the copier who produced Vaticanus recognized something was missing and left room for the last 12 verses. It was not uncommon for the last several verses of a papyrus or vellum scroll to be missing as, when it was rolled up, the very end of the manuscript would be the outermost layer of the roll and was more likely to be damaged.
You might have to explain that definition to some 'sports' teams or 'rap artists'. They 'practice', but maybe they don't have your definition.
Touché. Again?Doesn’t that mean we go back to the insanity comment
By Sam Gipp (i agree)
QUESTION: Don't King James Bible believer's "worship" the Bible? Didn't God destroy the originals because He didn't want these people to venerate them?
ANSWER: No and no.
The King James Bible (really the Holy Word of God, around a long time before James), that I hold in my hand today, is the perfectly preserved words of God (in the English language), what else would it be? Just askin', no, I am not stayin' 'round here. I am not here to tell you what you have in your (whosoever) hands, only to state what I have in mine.PS I freely admit to insanity.
I must be, if I expect any answer other than "the KJB is perfect".
The King James Bible (really the Holy Word of God, around a long time before James), that I hold in my hand today, is the perfectly preserved words of God (in the English language), what else would it be?
I don't "claim" to be a Baptist. I am a Baptist.No offense, but that is funny considering you claim being a "Baptist".
Why? What did I post that you think contradicts or stands in opposition to Baptist theology? And what do you mean by "Baptist theology?" Is systematic theology exclusively Baptist? If not, what part of Theology, either Systematic or Biblical, makes it "Baptist?"That is so far from Baptist theology it isn't even funny.
Which probably explains why the debate has been around since 1881.That also is highly debatable.
Any? Well, not really. I suggest your read "The Last Twelve Verses of Mark" by John Burgon, Worcester College, Oxford University, Gresham Professor of Divinity, Gresham College, London.Any textual critic would point out to you that the context of those verses do not match.
So does that mean you accept the KJV 1769 readings and reject the KJV 1611 readings as being wrong?thanks for that i use the 1769 KJB
You didn't post any. You just posted blanket accusations without any chapter or verse references to check to ascertain the place of the accused deletion.but what do You think of the NKJV problems that i posted?
NKJV, Perfectly preserved? Look at Hebrew 9:12 NKJV please, and show me a single Koine greek mss extant on earth that says 'most holy place' (hagia hagion):The New King James Bible (really the Holy Word of God, around a long time before James), that I hold in my hand today, is the perfectly preserved words of God (in the English language), what else would it be? Just askin', no, I am not stayin' 'round here. I am not here to tell you what you have in your (whosoever) hands, only to state what I have in mine.
World English Bible (WEB) a new revision of the ASV of 1901 [- World English Bible with Deuterocanon Preface ] into Modern English. The New Testament is revised to reflect the Majority Text. Yet it still has corruptions because of the ASV sources (such as the Biblia Hebraica Stutgartensa*) and "Majority"? Whose collection (Hermann von Soden's **)?The World English Bible (really the Holy Word of God, around a long time before James), that I hold in my hand today, is the perfectly preserved words of God (in the English language), what else would it be? Just askin', no, I am not stayin' 'round here. I am not here to tell you what you have in your (whosoever) hands, only to state what I have in mine.