So you do not agree that...
* Daniel 7 and Daniel in your view do not show a the restoration of the Sanctuary linked to judgement which is for the cleansing of sin?
They clearly relate to the restoring of the sanctuary from the defilement of the little horn.
The defilement of the little horn, and its subsequent removal, is not the same as the Day of Atonement.
* The book of life in not used in the judgement of Daniel 7-8?
It is not mentioned at all in Daniel 7 or 8. Nor would it need to be. The judgment is on powers, and they are not in the book of life.
* The book of life is not used in the judgement of God's people?
Of course it is. And the judgments where it is actually used, it is mentioned.
But Daniel 7 does not show the judgment on God's people. It shows judgment on the little horn, fourth beast, and allows the other three beasts to survive. The saints are referenced only as the beneficiaries, and corporately as a group being delivered, not scrutinized, etc.
* Judgement has nothing to do with the day of Atonement and the cleansing of the Sanctuary?
Not the work of the high priest in the sanctuary, no. That involved corporate provision for sin in the form of blood. There were no books, there were no records, there was provision of blood.
Now in regards to the activity of the people, yes. They either accepted the work done by the priest, or they did not. They either followed the prescriptions or not. And as I mentioned, I see some of the elements of the Day of Atonement being carried out in the end times. Though these are not spelled out in the NT as to their fulfillment, so the most we can do is figure based on the type.
But the sacrifice, entry, presentation before the Father, already happened. Purification for sins already happened. And that was the work of the high priest in the sanctuary.