GOD'S WORD vs TRADITIONS OF MEN; Sabbath vs Sunday

1stcenturylady

Spirit-filled follower of Christ
Site Supporter
Feb 13, 2017
11,189
4,193
76
Tennessee
✟431,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
That's fine -- but when you post and ask questions that basically ask that the post be "given again" for the detail you are discussing - it shows that it did not help that you did not read the post to start with.

When did I ask you that the post be "given again"? Just ask me a question, such as what do I think verse such and such means.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,351
10,605
Georgia
✟911,794.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Ask me a short question - not a whole page of them - and I'll answer you.

And @BobRyan

I responded to your question to me.

you admitted you did not read it.

That leaves us at a bit of a dead end. hard to have a discussion using your method as you have stated it.
 
Upvote 0

1stcenturylady

Spirit-filled follower of Christ
Site Supporter
Feb 13, 2017
11,189
4,193
76
Tennessee
✟431,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I responded to your question to me.

you admitted you did not read it.

That leaves us at a bit of a dead end. hard to have a discussion using your method as you have stated it.

You can keep on being an accuser of the brethren, or you can have some respect and ask me a question.

Remember, being exSDA I know all your questions and answers to them from your point of view. But you won't open your mind to the New Covenant that I know about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: listed
Upvote 0

1stcenturylady

Spirit-filled follower of Christ
Site Supporter
Feb 13, 2017
11,189
4,193
76
Tennessee
✟431,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I responded to your question to me.

you admitted you did not read it.

That leaves us at a bit of a dead end. hard to have a discussion using your method as you have stated it.

I read it the first time you sent it. And I was waiting for EastCoastRemnant and LoveGodsWord to add to it. But then you kept reposting it, and it was then I answered the texts. They were in James. Actually, that may have been my Aussie friend.

Why do you think it was said of the Ten Commandments that they couldn't make anyone righteous? Why was it called the Law of Sin and Death, also the Ministry of Death? Also of Hagar.

Why is the New Covenant called the Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ? And also the Law of Liberty?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: listed
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Ask me a short question - not a whole page of them - and I'll answer you.

And @BobRyan

Sooo we can ask you a short question but you will ignore all the scriptures sent to you that disagree with you?
 
Upvote 0

1stcenturylady

Spirit-filled follower of Christ
Site Supporter
Feb 13, 2017
11,189
4,193
76
Tennessee
✟431,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Sooo we can ask you a short question but you will ignore all the scriptures sent to you that disagree with you?

No, silly, as I have already said, those are the ones I WILL answer.

Well, I see neither of you want to ask me a question. You are looking at the forum titles, and Bob is looking at another post.

I'm going to bed then. nighty night.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
No, silly, as I have already said, those are the ones I WILL answer.

Well, I see neither of you want to ask me a question. You are looking at the forum titles, and Bob is looking at another post.

I'm going to bed then. nighty night.

Sorry 1stcenturylady,

I was not ignoring you. I was not at my PC at the time. Sometimes I just leave my PC on. We had a wedding to attend today. We can chat more latter if you like.

I sent the STRONGS # for NOMOS request in the other thread for your interest for the NOMOS/ENTOLE post. :wave:
 
Upvote 0

listed

are you?
May 14, 2011
9,126
1,817
✟53,797.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
That's fine -- but when you post and ask questions that basically ask that the post be "given again" for the detail you are discussing - it shows that it did not help that you did not read the post to start with.

BTW you already admitted it was a new post to you



and you already admitted you did not actually read it.
Why read long posts when in the first few sentences are incorrect statements? What makes you think anything based on them would then be correct?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Are we ignoring only your scriptures or are we being asked and required to ignore much of the NT?

Hello listed,

I do not know, what you are asking. God tells us that we are to live by EVERY WORD that proceeds out of the mouth of God. If you ignore God's WORD you cannot be helped. Only God's WORD is true and we should BELIEVE and FOLLOW him who calls us in LOVE to LOVE another.

Those who CONTINUE IN KNOWN SIN when God's WORD has been given them a KNOWLDGE of the truth will NOT enter the KINGDOM of HEAVEN (Hebrews 10:26-27).
 
Upvote 0

Cribstyl

Veteran
Jun 13, 2006
8,992
2,068
✟99,143.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
hint: the "old covenant" was given in fact to Adam as "Obey and Live"
Paul says the "Gospel was preached to THEM (Israel at Sinai) - just as it was to US also " Heb 4:1
These claims are proven to be false. #1. God's command to Adam about not eating from the tree of Good and evil, was not the old covenant. Paul made it clear that Adam's transgression was a command he broke, not a law.
Rom 5:14 - Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
(In above text Paul identified that from Adam-Moses was before the law, and death rules for sin.)
#2. Heb 4:2 refers to the rejection of what Jesus and the apostle preached to the Jews.
#3. The Gospel of the OT is the saying to Abraham, that all nations would be blessed through his seed. (it's not the law)
Gal 3:8 - And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.
BobRyan said:
Yet Sinai was not an "individual" covenant (and the New Covenant is) . In other words it is not as though there were 2 million sinless "individuals" at Sinai -- until they started worshiping the golden calf.

Thus it is the NEW Covenant according to Paul - the Gospel that was being given all along - but at Sinai it was given with visual aids and illustrations.

The national-covenant at Sinai is used as a "symbol" of the Old Covenant made with Adam "obey and live" because at the level of 'a nation' that is how it was framed. Only national apostasy / rebellion -- would break it. An individual who coveted on that day or any other -- would not break that covenant.

The SAME moral Law is in both the Old and and NEW Covenant as the Bible shows and as even..........
Really? I disagree. You must ignore scriptures that say; the covenant with Abraham precedes the law by 430 years.
[URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/17/s_1094017']Gal 3:17[/URL][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'] - And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
[URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/18/s_1094018']Gal 3:18
- For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.[/URL][/URL][/URL][/URL]
[URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008']
[URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008'][URL='https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gal/3/8/s_1094008']You're contradicting the bible.
[/URL][/URL][/URL][/URL][/URL][/URL][/URL][/URL][/URL][/URL][/URL][/URL][/URL]
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: listed
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,351
10,605
Georgia
✟911,794.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Question to @BobRyan. What covenant was given by God on Mt. Sinai? Whatever it was represented Ishmael and was to be "cast out"

hint: the "old covenant" was given in fact to Adam as "Obey and Live"
Paul says the "Gospel was preached to THEM (Israel at Sinai) - just as it was to US also " Heb 4:1

Yet Sinai was not an "individual" covenant (and the New Covenant is) . In other words it is not as though there were 2 million sinless "individuals" at Sinai -- until they started worshiping the golden calf.

Thus it is the NEW Covenant according to Paul - the Gospel that was being given all along - but at Sinai it was given with visual aids and illustrations.

The national-covenant at Sinai is used as a "symbol" of the Old Covenant made with Adam "obey and live" because at the level of 'a nation' that is how it was framed. Only national apostasy / rebellion -- would break it. An individual who coveted on that day or any other -- would not break that covenant.

The SAME moral Law is in both the Old and and NEW Covenant as the Bible shows and as even
The Baptist Confession of Faith,
the Westminster Confession of Faith ,
D.L. Moody,
R.C Sproul,
Matthew Henry,
Thomas Watson -- freely demonstrate that they too can see this glaringly obvious Bible detail.

Question for 1stcenturylady - what part of this did you not know "really"?? I don't think that this particular post is "news" to very many people -- not even
The Baptist Confession of Faith,
the Westminster Confession of Faith

And I think you have seen something from me like it from me before.

You know better than that Bob Ryan. You'd have to malign too many scriptures

On the contrary - I prefer the scriptures -- instead of man made traditions.

(Jeremiah 31:32-) When God first Identifies the New Covenant, He said it would not be anything like the Old Covenant: “not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt,"

had you actually read the post you claimed to have been responding to - you would have seen that point already dealt with.

God also said this covenant was not made with the fathers before Moses.
Deu 5:2 - “The LORD our God made a covenant with us in Horeb.
Deu 5:3 - “The LORD did not make this covenant with our fathers, but with us, those who are here today, all of us who are alive.

Which makes my point - the Gospel was from Adam to this very day. The "national covenant" was at Sinai and could not have been made before that - since they were not a nation before that.

The point remains.


2. Heb 4:2 is a reference to the Gospel of Jesus Christ that was rejected by the Jews and "US" reference the Gentiles (and all believers) who can enter into His rest.

Paul always includes himself in "US" and does not argue that he rejected the gospel Hebrews 3 and 4 is not about "all have rejected the Gospel -- even US.. the Apostles" and we all know it.

These claims are proven to be false. #1. God's command to Adam about not eating from the tree of Good and evil, was not the old covenant.

Indeed it was - much older than even the Gospel -- it was "obey and live" --- and all sinless beings in entire universe where under that covenant.

The point remains.

Paul also points to it as "obey and live" in Galatians 3.

God's LAW existed even in Eden - and included the TEN commandments as not only Christ's affirmation in Mark 2:27 indicates but so also do scholars on both sides of this debate agree.

The Baptist Confession of Faith,
the Westminster Confession of Faith ,
D.L. Moody,
R.C Sproul,
Matthew Henry,
Thomas Watson
Eastern Orthodox Catechism
The Catholic Catechism.

Really? I disagree.

You are of course welcome to your personal preference. You have free will.

I choose the Bible
 
Upvote 0

1stcenturylady

Spirit-filled follower of Christ
Site Supporter
Feb 13, 2017
11,189
4,193
76
Tennessee
✟431,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
hint: the "old covenant" was given in fact to Adam as "Obey and Live"
Paul says the "Gospel was preached to THEM (Israel at Sinai) - just as it was to US also " Heb 4:1

Yet Sinai was not an "individual" covenant (and the New Covenant is) . In other words it is not as though there were 2 million sinless "individuals" at Sinai -- until they started worshiping the golden calf.

Thus it is the NEW Covenant according to Paul - the Gospel that was being given all along - but at Sinai it was given with visual aids and illustrations.

The national-covenant at Sinai is used as a "symbol" of the Old Covenant made with Adam "obey and live" because at the level of 'a nation' that is how it was framed. Only national apostasy / rebellion -- would break it. An individual who coveted on that day or any other -- would not break that covenant.

The SAME moral Law is in both the Old and and NEW Covenant as the Bible shows and as even
The Baptist Confession of Faith,
the Westminster Confession of Faith ,
D.L. Moody,
R.C Sproul,
Matthew Henry,
Thomas Watson -- freely demonstrate that they too can see this glaringly obvious Bible detail.

Question for 1stcenturylady - what part of this did you not know "really"?? I don't think that this particular post is "news" to very many people -- not even
The Baptist Confession of Faith,
the Westminster Confession of Faith

And I think you have seen something from me like it from me before.



On the contrary - I prefer the scriptures -- instead of man made traditions.



had you actually read the post you claimed to have been responding to - you would have seen that point already dealt with.



Which makes my point - the Gospel was from Adam to this very day. The "national covenant" was at Sinai and could not have been made before that - since they were not a nation before that.

The point remains.




Paul always includes himself in "US" and does not argue that he rejected the gospel Hebrews 3 and 4 is not about "all have rejected the Gospel -- even US.. the Apostles" and we all know it.



Indeed it was - much older than even the Gospel -- it was "obey and live" --- and all sinless beings in entire universe where under that covenant.

The point remains.

Paul also points to it as "obey and live" in Galatians 3.

God's LAW existed even in Eden - and included the TEN commandments as not only Christ's affirmation in Mark 2:27 indicates but so also do scholars on both sides of this debate agree.

The Baptist Confession of Faith,
the Westminster Confession of Faith ,
D.L. Moody,
R.C Sproul,
Matthew Henry,
Thomas Watson
Eastern Orthodox Catechism
The Catholic Catechism.



You are of course welcome to your personal preference. You have free will.

I choose the Bible

Just read what I wrote to the others as it applies to you too.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Cribstyl

Veteran
Jun 13, 2006
8,992
2,068
✟99,143.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Repeating lies does not make them true. You have not proved any of your claims with scriptures.
Here are 2 SDA pioneers identifying the Old and New Covenants.
Here are the words of JN Andrews


How can men thus carelessly read the Scriptures? The language of inspiration is very explicit in stating that the new covenant is made with the same people that were the subjects of the old covenant. Thus Jeremiah, speaking in the name of the Lord, says: “I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah.” And he further alludes to the fact that the new covenant is made with the Hebrew people when he adds: “Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt.” And yet again he identifies the Hebrew people when he says: “This shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel.” And Paul quotes at length, in Hebrews 8, this entire statement of Jeremiah respecting the old and new covenants’ being severally made with the Hebrew people. And, as if this were not enough, he makes a statement in Romans 9:4, 5, that exactly meets the case. Thus he says of the Hebrews: “Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed forever.” Thus it appears that everything valuable God has given to the world through the instrumentality, or by the means, of the Hebrew people. Those who choose to do so can venture to despise the law of God because given to the Jews, and to reject Christ because he came of the Jews; but one thing they cannot do. They cannot say, “We accept the new covenant because it pertains to the Gentiles, whereas the first covenant, and the law, etc., pertained to the Jews.” No such distinction can be drawn. Both the covenants pertain to the Hebrew people, according to the explicit statement of Paul; and both are said by Jeremiah and Paul, or rather by the Spirit of inspiration speaking through them, to be made with Judah and Israel. SOTC
Sermon on the Two Covenants

Here are words of Uriah Smith
Can we than tell what did constitute the first, or old, covenant. What does the word, covenant, mean? Webster defines it thus: “A mutual agreement of two or more persons or parties, in writing and under seal, to do or to refrain from, some act or thing; a contract; stipulation.” This is the primary, leading definition of the word; and in looking for the old covenant, we look for some transaction to which this definition will apply. TTC 5.3

We have definite data from which to work. We are told who was the author of the first covenant. It was God. We are told with whom it was made. It was made with Israel. We are told when it was made: It was made with that people when they came out of the land of Egypt.
Jeremiah 31:32; Hebrews 8:9. By these circumstances the old covenant is clearly distinguished from the Adamic, the Abrahamic, or any other covenant brought to view in the Bible. TTC 6.1

We go back therefore to the history of Israel as they came out of Egypt, and lay down this as a consistent and self-evident principle: That the very first transaction we find taking place between God and the Israelites after they left Egypt, which answers to the definition of the word covenant, must be the first covenant, unless some good reason can be shown why it is not. TTC 6.2

The Two Covenants
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: listed
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Repeating lies does not make them true. You have not proved any of your claims with scriptures.

Hello Cribstyl,

Nice to meet you and welcome here. I will talk scripture with you. What are you claiming are lies? Only God's WORD is true and we should BELIEVE the WORD of GOD over the teachings and traditions of men that break the Commandments of God. Let's talk scriptures.......

................

SIN is the breaking of God's Commandments (James 2:9-11; Romans 7:7; 1 John 3:4)

Those who CONTINUE in UNREPENTANT SIN will NOT enter into the KINGDOM of HEAVEN.

................

God's 4th commandment is one of the ten (Exodus 20:8-11) If we knowingly break it when God asks us not to we stand guilty before God of committing sin (James 2:8-12). If we do not seek him in repentance and forgiveness we are in danger of the Judgement (Hebrews 10:26-27)

Sunday worship is a tradition and teaching of man that has led many to break the commandments of God. Jesus says that if we follow the traditions of man that break the commandments of God we are not following God (Matthew 15:3-9)

There is not one scripture in all of God's Word that says that God's 4th Commandment is now ABOLISHED and we are now commanded to KEEP Sunday as a Holy day.

Who should we follow the teachings and traditions of men or the Word of God? Who should we believe the Words of men or the Word of God?

In times of ignorance God winks at but now ,<when a KNOWLEDGE of the truth has come> calls all men everywhere to REPENT (FOLLOW) (Acts 17:30-31).
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,351
10,605
Georgia
✟911,794.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN - GOD'S WORD vs TRADITIONS OF MEN

The very same topics that we discuss here was also discussed in the day of Jesus. The mainstream preachers of Christ's time all claimed to be Children of God because their claim was that they were the Children of Abraham right? This was their claim to being God's people.

JOHN 8
33 They answered him, We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how say thou, Ye shall be made free?

They claimed belief on the God of Abraham, they claimed to be in bondage to no man. But what did Jesus tell them...............?

34 Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever commits sin is the servant of sin.

39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

There is more on this engagement between Jesus and the Mainstream God of Abraham preachers of His time in John 8.

Certainly the Pharisees studied the bible as it existed then. AS did Jesus.

Luke 24:27
And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.

Yet these two factions, Jesus and the Mainstream preachers of His time had almost opposite understandings of the Bible.

It is fair to say not all Jews of that time had the same understanding as the Mainstream Preachers.

Luke 1:5
There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth.

6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.

So there seems to be a trend here.

The Mainstream Preachers claimed to be God's people, they read God's Words, yet they "Transgressed the Commandments of God by their own doctrines and traditions." (Matthew 15:3-9)

Yet there is no indication that Zacharias or Jesus did this and followed them.

So we have one example of understanding that was gained by study in obedience to the instructions in God's Word, ( Zacharias and Jesus)

And another example of study in disobedience to the instructions of God's Word. (Mainstream preachers of that time)

There were more than just Zacharias.

Matthew 2:1
Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem,

2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.

Here is another example of people who had a completely different understanding than the Mainstream preachers of that time. Is it wrong to assume that they, like Zacharias, also studied in obedience to the instruction?

And Peter, which side of this topic did he fall on?

Acts 5:32
And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him.

33 When they heard that, they were cut to the heart, and took counsel to slay them.

Now why was it that the Jews sought to persecute Jesus and the prophets? It was because they refused to obey the instruction of God, and created their own instructions, and the other example did not.

So fast forward to today. We have a Mainstream Christian teaching that "Transgresses the Commandments of God by their own traditions and doctrines."

This is not a judgment, rather, a simple fact.

It is Mainstream Christian Tradition to transgress God's Sabbath Commandment and replace it with the Catholic Sabbath (Sunday worship). It is Mainstream Christian Tradition to create images of God in the likeness of some long haired men's shampoo model, transgressing the first and greatest commandment.
It is Mainstream Christian Tradition to transgress God's Food Laws, and create their own definition of clean and unclean.

So it seems that even today, if a person studies in obedience to God's simple instructions he see's the scripture one way.

If a person studies scripture in disobedience following the traditions and teachings of man in place of God's Word and to God's simple instructions, he sees the scripture in another way.

I believe what Peter taught, that the Holy Spirit (Spirit of Truth) is given to those who do not "Transgress the Commandments of God by their own religious doctrines and traditions.

But I also know from Peter and Jesus that this belief will infuriate "many" who come in Christ's/God's name.

23 "When they heard that, they were cut to the heart, and took counsel to slay them."

Matthew 10:22
And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endures to the end shall be saved."

My hope is that you might consider these words and understand.

John 3:19
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. (Is it evil or righteous to transgress the commandments of God by doctrines and traditions of men?)

20 For every one that doeth evil (Transgress God's Commandments by their own Traditions) hates the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.

Is this why the Mainstream preachers of Peters time set about to kill or silence Peter, so he wouldn't expose their transgression of God's Commandments?

21 But he that does truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest,.(let your light shine) that they are wrought in God.

So a circle complete once again. Those who live a doctrine created (wrought) by God have a different understanding than those who live a doctrine created by man who follow the traditions of man. The above was shared with me recently by a friend. I hope it was a blessing to you as it was for me.

Now the important question is who should we obey God or man...............?

The Jews (Pharisees/Lawyers) had placed so many restrictions on the Sabbath commandment through there man made traditions that it had become a burden to the people and was nearly impossible to keep (Luke 13:14; John 5:10-18; 9:16; etc.).

This was never how the Sabbath was to be kept. What did Jesus teach us about the Sabbath? Let's look to the Word of God.....

1. It is lawful to do good on the Sabbath (Matt 12:1-8; 10-12; 24:20; Mark 3:1-5; Luke 6:1-10; 13:14-16; 14:1-5; John 7:22-23; 9:14; Mark 1:21; Mark 6:2; Luke 4:16; 31; Luke 14:1; 23:56)
2. Jesus made the Sabbath for all mankind (Mark 2:27)
3. Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath (Mark 2:28)
4. If you do not believe and follow God you cannot enter His Sabbath rest (Hebrews 4)
5. It is one of God’s 10 commandments we break it we are guilty or breaking all (James 2:8-12)
6. Breaking it is sin (1 John 3:4)
7. God’s true followers keep it Holy as God commanded (Rev 14:12; Rev 22:14; Eze 20:20)
8. Jesus is our example and he kept the Sabbath (Matt 12:1-8; 10-12; 24:20; Mark 3:1-5; Luke 6:1-10; 13:14-16; 14:1-5; John 7:22-23; 9:14; Mark 1:21; Mark 6:2; Luke 4:16; 31; Luke 14:1; 23:56; John 2:6; Matt 16:24; 1 Cor 11:1; Eph 5:1-21; Pet 2:20-22)
9. The Apostle kept the Sabbath (Acts 13:14; 13:27; 13:44; 15:21; 16:13; 17:2; 18:4; Rev 1:10)

God’s Law in the NC is written on our hearts it is through love and it is love that fulfills God’s Law in us as we walk not after the flesh but after the spirit and is why Jesus says f you love me keep my commandments. (John 14:15; John 15:10). If we knowingly and willfully break one of God’s commandments we commit sin (1 John 3:4). This includes the 7th Day Sabbath which Jesus made for us and commands us to keep as a holy day.

God gives us the other six days to labor and work and do whatever we like. We worship God everyday but the 7th Day God says is a Holy day that God has made for His people. Jesus is the maker of this day. It is the "Lords Day" and God has commanded us to keep it Holy (Mark 2:27-28; Exodus 20:8-11). The Sabbath is a sign that we worship the only true God of creation (Ezekiel 20:12). We follow Jesus because we love him (John 14:15;15:10). Love is the fulfilling of God's Law in us as we walk by faith in the Spirit.

.........................................................................................................................
NOTE: PLEASE NO FLAMING OR GOADING; THIS IS A DISCUSSION THREAD ONLY FOR
SHARING GOD'S WORD IN LOVE; FRIENDLY DISCUSSION PLEASE!
.......................................................................................................................

May God bless you as you seek him through His Word.

Good post.

And goes with this in Mark 7

Mark 7:6-13

7 ‘But in vain do they worship Me,
Teaching as doctrines the precepts of men.’
8 Neglecting the commandment of God, you hold to the tradition of men.”
9 He was also saying to them, “You are experts at setting aside the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition. 10 For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and your mother’; and, ‘He who speaks evil of father or mother, is to be put to death’; 11 but you say, ‘If a man says to his father or his mother, whatever I have that would help you is Corban (that is to say, given to God),’ 12 you no longer permit him to do anything for his father or his mother; 13 thus invalidating the word of God by your tradition which you have handed down; and you do many things such as that.”
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,351
10,605
Georgia
✟911,794.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Repeating lies does not make them true. You have not proved any of your claims with scriptures.
Here are 2 SDA pioneers identifying the Old and New Covenants.
Here are the words of JN Andrews

And here is the "Baptist Confession of Faith" section 19 - admitting that the New Covenant has the TEN Commandments written on the heart.

Philadelphia Confession of Faith (1742)

And here is the "Westminster Confession of Faith" section 19 - admitting that the New Covenant has the TEN Commandments written on the heart.
Westminster Confession of Faith: Chapter 19 - Of the Law of God..

Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 19. The Law and the Covenant of Works.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Good post.

And goes with this in Mark 7

Mark 7:6-13

7 ‘But in vain do they worship Me,
Teaching as doctrines the precepts of men.’
8 Neglecting the commandment of God, you hold to the tradition of men.”
9 He was also saying to them, “You are experts at setting aside the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition. 10 For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and your mother’; and, ‘He who speaks evil of father or mother, is to be put to death’; 11 but you say, ‘If a man says to his father or his mother, whatever I have that would help you is Corban (that is to say, given to God),’ 12 you no longer permit him to do anything for his father or his mother; 13 thus invalidating the word of God by your tradition which you have handed down; and you do many things such as that.”

Yes Bob, I love these scriptures I normally use Matthew 15:3-9 version in many of my signature posts when I use them. Matthew 15:3-9 is added to the OP but only as text listed. I think I should have written them out however but the post was getting a little long. Maybe I might adjust the OP.

Thanks for sharing :wave:
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

listed

are you?
May 14, 2011
9,126
1,817
✟53,797.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Hello listed,

I do not know, what you are asking. God tells us that we are to live by EVERY WORD that proceeds out of the mouth of God. If you ignore God's WORD you cannot be helped. Only God's WORD is true and we should BELIEVE and FOLLOW him who calls us in LOVE to LOVE another.

Those who CONTINUE IN KNOWN SIN when God's WORD has been given them a KNOWLDGE of the truth will NOT enter the KINGDOM of HEAVEN (Hebrews 10:26-27).
Is the NT words of God? You use it like they are. Do you claim only parts of say the same book are while other parts aren't? Doesn't that make it an unreliable source of truth?

A problem exists because you think you can observe 2 conflicting covenants. What the truth is you have something that is neither.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob S
Upvote 0