- Mar 25, 2014
- 371
- 66
- 49
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Concerning?specific scriptures
I have quoted a ton of scripture with multiple correlation showing many connections.
Upvote
0
Concerning?specific scriptures
You list chapters hereAgain, the corresponding genealogy of Genesis 5 are the sons of God. Look at the genealogy in Luke 3. Look at the title given to the Adam of that genealogy. You will see it doesn't match the genealogy of the sons of men in Genesis 4. Its no accident they are different.
Genesis 4: (16-26), Genesis 5: (1-32), Luke 3: (23-38)You list chapters here
which specific scriptures in these chapters are referenced to compare
Again, the corresponding genealogy of Genesis 5 are the sons of God. Look at the genealogy in Luke 3. Look at the title given to the Adam of that genealogy. You will see it doesn't match the genealogy of the sons of men in Genesis 4. Its no accident they are different.
I don't know where you got what you said.Handmaid ------What i said is proved by the Bible
The Bible prove that Adam And Eve had their third child named SETH at the age of 130 years ...---->only after that it is mentioned that they had daughters and others sons.I don't know where you got what you said.
The Bible prove that Adam And Eve had their third child named SETH at the age of 130 years Genesis 5:3-4...---->only after that it is mentioned that they had daughters and others sons.
Genesis 5:3-4
3 And Adam lived a hundred and thirty years, and begat [a son] in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth: 4 and the days of Adam after he begat Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters.
Go at the END of Genesis 4 it is said that Adam and Eve meet again[have sex]and bare a son NAMED SETH ....So YOU say.This does not specify when the girls were born. It says and he begat sons and daughters.
I see your point .. On the one hand . Every kind of animal at creation contained DNA with every variant of its kind we see today in its original DNA which holds way, way more information than we use individually then or today but pass on none-the-less ..To emphasis my point further. Two creations, one corresponds to the genealogy of Genesis 4 and the other Genesis 5. One are the sons of men while those "after His kind" are the sons of God.
Guess the end result.
Genesis 6: (1-2) 1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
I agree and 1 Titus 1:14 reminds us to beware of Jewish myths such as some found mingled in Enoch and the Talmud and such of uninspired works ..Our Father is not the author of confusion. He is able to preserve His scripture.
You all are reaching, in error. Adam according to scripture was created Son of God. He sinned, and became just a man with the sin nature. Every other man thereafter was born/begotten in Adams image, not God's. Every man after Adam had the sin nature and passed it along to all men. The women could not pass on the sin nature. Look, I am a Registered Nurse and my career(retired) is in human reproduction. You have heard about hemophilia, that it is passed from the mother to her sons but not to her daughters. Well, look at the sin nature with this optic. Our Father preserved the seed of the woman so the sin nature would not pass through her to the Messiah. Lord Jesus was begotten( not created) of God into the woman the virgin Mary. Seth and all of his children were sons of man, not sons of God. Noah and his sons were sons of man, not sons of God. Seth was begotten of Adam after his own image, not after the image of God.On the other hand God could have created several men and animals with even more diverse DNA to assure the pairs he selected for the Ark would have adequate DNA diversity in kinds to adapt to what appears a different post flood world to repopulate as he saw fit concerning what I think was a new environment he knew would be needed post flood, still no evolution and remember God caused first rain ever at Methuselah's death , the last of the sons of God to die pre-flood , no sons of God were wiped out by the flood but either died or saved through it .
You all are reaching, in error. Adam according to scripture was created Son of God. He sinned, and became just a man with the sin nature. Every other man thereafter was born/begotten in Adams image, not God's. Every man after Adam had the sin nature and passed it along to all men. The women could not pass on the sin nature. Look, I am a Registered Nurse and my career(retired) is in human reproduction. You have heard about hemophilia, that it is passed from the mother to her sons but not to her daughters. Well, look at the sin nature with this optic. Our Father preserved the seed of the woman so the sin nature would not pass through her to the Messiah. Lord Jesus was begotten( not created) of God into the woman the virgin Mary. Seth and all of his children were sons of man, not sons of God. Noah and his sons were sons of man, not sons of God. Seth was begotten of Adam after his own image, not after the image of God.
Gen 5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth:
Now you can call Seth a son of God if you like, that is on you. But scripture shows that Seth and all of his sons are sons of man. I can't help you get it.God did not create other men as sons of God, you all need to stop that lie. Death came through Adam after he sinned. Our Father preserved Adam's seed through Noah and his sons on the ark.
Ask yourself, why didn't our Father just kill satan and the angels that sinned? Why imprison them instead? I will tell you. Because they are eternal beings , they do not die as we understand dying. They are destined to the lake of fire.
I think our Father would have told us if what you say is true for He is not the author of confusion.They are two lines, not one. Don't treat them as the same. The chapter five genealogy is different then the one that are defined as fallen due to that Adams sin.
The chapter 5 genealogy, the "sons of God" where preserved clean. See Romans 5: 14. These are the ones that are the figure of him to come and do not have the sin the first Adam had. Notice the word "similitude". Most want want to claim this is Christ but it is not. This states that they are similar to Christ and a figure of him to come and not him directly.
Romans 5: (12-19) 12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: 13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come. 15 But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many. 16 And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification. 17 For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.) 18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. 19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.
See below. Notice verse 47. The first Adam is of the dust of the earth and the second is made "after His kind".
I Corinthians 15: (45-49)
45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. 47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven. 48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly. 49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.
I think our Father would have told us if what you say is true for He is not the author of confusion.
They are two lines, not one. Don't treat them as the same. The chapter five genealogy is different then the one that are defined as fallen due to that Adams sin.
Well I will put it this way, and give your POV the benefit of the doubt. I will hold to my POV until and if the Holy Spirit reveals that my POV is wrong and yours is right. But for now, we can cordially agree to disagree.He did tell us. Its in his word. I've present scripture after scripture reinforcing it.
Also realize Christ spokevin parables very often. Things are not as straight forward as many would believe. The things concerning creation are very hidden. This world paints a lie that it is straight forward but Christ himself said it wasn't.
Matt 13:35 That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.