Read what I wrote. I said if they mated they would not create a soul, only flesh. The quotes of 2 Peter and Jude have nothing to do with Gen 6.
That is a purpose, not a created feature. We are created in the image of God. Angels chose to follow or not follow God the same as you say is our special feature. Choice is certainly a "feature" of their creation like us, but we not angels are in the image of God and may be redeemed by Jesus' death.
So you think that fallen angels can mate with women and create a new soul, but not when we mate, we don't create a new soul? Scripture is clear that when men and women reproduce a new person with a soul comes about. Do you think God sends a soul down from heaven for everyone born? This is why Jesus is special, and his birth required a virgin conception, no man involved, otherwise Jesus would have had a new soul and not his eternal spirit.
I meant both in flesh and in spirit as that angels are spirits themselves and the daughters of men were of the flesh. So I was referring to both body and spirit. And since you don't agree that Jude 6:2 and 2 Peter 2:4 are referring to Genesis 6:2, what were they referring to?
Also, I was speaking of a
living soul in the sense of living eternally. Evil spirits are not living spirits in that same sense. Though they have no body, doesn't mean they are eternal beings. So from the context made more clear to you, isn't it only God that can bring forth a living soul?
Angels are spirits. Demons are spirits. It is not "easy" for angels to take on flesh or even effect the physical world. When they do so it is governed by what God allows. It is a poor argument of conjecture that because God does not allow the evil spirits to interact with us exactly the same, means they are not both angels.
Isn't your whole understanding of Genesis 6 the result of fallen angels taking on the form of men such that they can mate with women?
The Bible says that angels do take the form of men be it effortlessly or not (even Satan is mentioned), and there are no examples in the Bible of demons doing the same. I don't see how that is a poor argument to use when you are not providing scripture to justify your claims that angels and demons are one of the same. My point is angels can take the form of men and demons cannot. A contradiction that you haven't addressed but are dancing around it. How is that being honest to the what the scriptures are saying?
Do you think the fallen angels have physical chains holding them somewhere? The chains symbolize being constrained by God, but in the last days they will be let loose from the chains. If you looked at the world you would see the work of Satan and his servants/spirits. I have provided many texts. Do you know how the Psalms repeat the same two different ways? Look at 1 Timouthy 4:1 and Revelation 18:2 to see demons are impure spirits. If angels are spirits, then impure spirits are Satan's angels. And Romans 8:38 as I already pointed out is clear, demons are angels.
So your argument is that the angels have just been set loose right about now? Take my position and ask yourself honestly, doesn't that seem awfully convenient and rather nonsensical as even in the time of Jesus, and in the time of Job 4.12-15 we have examples of evil spirits. Were the angels set loose back then as well? You're really reaching for the skies, brother.
However way you look at what the chains are, is besides the point, according to scripture they are being constrained in darkness. And just because angels are spirits and demons are spirits, I think it is a bit of a stretch (not to mention unbiblical) to ascertain they are therefore the same. And using Romans 8:38 doesn't claim they're the same, you're reading into something that isn't there.
But this exegesis does not counter anything I have stated. In fact the quoted Job 38:7 only reinforces my claim that the stars of Rev 12:4 are angels. Understand that Revelation uses symbolism. If you can figure out that the dragon in 12:3 is Satan, than you should be able to figure out that the starts of 12:4 are angels, fallen. Have you ever seen the movie "It's a wonderful life"? Even they associate stars with angels.
Try to focus. I'm talking about Genesis 6 which in the OT. If there are numerous examples of the "sons of God" being used in OT as being referred to as angels of God, Genesis 6:2 which uses the same Hebraic wording should be also used as angels of God.
You know, the more I learn about your position on that angels and demons are the same, the more I realise that it is less to do with Biblical conception, and more about a insisting it is true because you say so, even to the point you are making things up.