Yekcidmij
Presbyterian, Polymath
- Feb 18, 2002
- 10,445
- 1,448
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Presbyterian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Um, no. I said we should determine if he actually did the behavior before taking action against him on account of that behavior.
You said this:
Has Moore been lawfully arrested?
Has Moore been lawfully charged?
Has Moore had a lawful court hearing?
Has Moore had a lawful court trial?
Has Moore had a lawful court judgement?
Has Moore had a lawful court sentence?
~ For they WHO, find no need for lawful proceedings to CONVICT of man of GUILT BEFORE GUILT is proven ~
I'm I to understand that you now retract this?
Or do you believe people are presumed guilty based on accusations?
It looks like you're trying to tweak what you already posted. I think there is no requirement to wait for a court case when looking at ethical behavior of someone running for public office.
That's really all you had to say, without all the prefacing gibberish.
No, it was necessary to point out your use of a red herring. That "gibberish" was showing you the faulty argument you were attempting to make.
Upvote
0