Clinton campaign, DNC helped fund dossier research

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Clinton campaign, DNC helped fund dossier research

Washington (CNN)Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund research that led to the now-infamous dossier of allegations about President Donald Trump and Russia, a source familiar with the matter told CNN.

The source said the law firm Perkins Coie, as part of its representation of the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained the intelligence firm Fusion GPS and entered "into an engagement for research services that began in April 2016 and concluded before the election in early November."
The Washington Post was first
to report the news Tuesday. {Poster comment: No other sources have been reporting this since February 2017}


The newspaper, citing people familiar with the matter, said a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC hired Fusion GPS, which in turn hired former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, whose research makes up the document. The Post said Perkins Coie lawyer Marc Elias retained the research firm in April 2016 as the GOP primary was winding down and Trump was increasingly likely to clinch his party's nomination.
CNN
previously reported Fusion GPS's anti-Trump research was initially funded by anti-Trump Republicans during the GOP primaries, and Democrats began paying the research firm later on, after Trump became the presumptive nominee. The Washington Post reports that Fusion GPS hired Steele after the Democratic funding began and the general election picture grew clearer.


Brian Fallon, the Clinton campaign's national press secretary and now a CNN political contributor, tweeted Tuesday that he wasn't aware of the connection between the campaign and the dossier authored by Steele, but "if I had, I would have volunteered to go to Europe and try to help him."
"I have no idea what Fusion or Steele were paid but if even a shred of that dossier ends up helping Mueller, it will prove money well spent,"
he tweeted.
DNC communications director Xochitl Hinojosa said in a statement Tuesday: "Tom Perez and the new leadership of the DNC were not involved in any decision-making regarding Fusion GPS, nor were they aware that Perkins Coie was working with the organization. But let's be clear, there is a serious federal investigation into the Trump campaign's ties to Russia, and the American public deserves to know what happened."
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said Tuesday that the news of the Clinton campaign and DNC funding the dossier research was "the real Russia scandal."
"The real Russia scandal? Clinton campaign paid for the fake Russia dossier, then lied about it & covered it up,"
Sanders tweeted.

Clinton campaign, DNC helped fund Trump dossier research, report says - CNNPolitics

The real Russian collusion.
 

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Calling something fake by people in 45's cabinet is a good indicator that is not fake, hence the reason why things in the dossier have been verified.

One thing. The dossier may have exposed a Russian spy at the Russian embassy (from your source:

But sources I know and trust have told me the US government identified Kalugin as a spy while he was still at the embassy.

It is not clear if the American intelligence agencies already believed this when they got Steele's report on the "diplomat", as early as May 2016.

But it is a judgment they made using their own methods, outside the dossier.

A retired member of a US intelligence agency told me that Kalugin was being kept under surveillance before he left the US.

In addition, State Department staff who dealt with Russia did not come across Kalugin, as would have been expected with a simple diplomat.

"Nobody had met him," one former official said. "It's classic. Just classic [of Russian intelligence]."

Last month, the McClatchy news website said he was under "scrutiny" by the FBI as he left the US. They did not report, as my sources say, that he was a member of one of Russia's spying organisations, the SVR or GRU.


I am totally shocked the Russians would have spies at their American Embassy! Call the UN!

Yet none of the bogus claims on Trump have been verified. That's because the dossier was a political witch hunt.

Again, read the CNN article. The only campaign which colluded with the Russians was the Clinton campaign. They paid Fusion GPS and Fusion hired old Western cold warriors who were cozy with KGB old cold warriors.

Now Fusion and agents at large are clamming up and pleading the 5th.
 
Upvote 0

Ringo84

Separation of Church and State expert
Jul 31, 2006
19,228
5,252
A Cylon Basestar
Visit site
✟121,289.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
What's Up With The Times Piece on Elias, Steele and Fusion GPS?

TPM said:
But here’s what jumps out at me about the Times story: what’s not included. Let me list a few points.

* The fact that it has been publicly known for more than a year that the Fusion GPS investigation of Chimp’s ties to Russia began with funding from Republicans and was later funded by Democrats. This has been known since David Corn’s report in October 2016 and reported in numerous other reports since. This is never mentioned in the Times article.

* The fact that the Fusion GPS’s investigation into Russia began as a project funded by Republicans. This is never mentioned in the Times report, although it’s alluded to in the letter from Perkins Coie Managing Partner Matthew J. Gehringer. (The precise timeline is this: Republicans hire Fusion GPS to investigate Chimp business. Investigation quickly turns to focus on Chimp’s ties to Russia. Republicans lose interest. Elias agrees to continue the funding with money from DNC/HRC campaign. Steele brought in to go deeper into Russia ties.)

* The Times report can be read to suggest that the Clinton campaign and the DNC paid $12.4 million for the Fusion GPS research. But as the Post notes, these tabulations date back to June and November 2015, fully a year before Elias signed up Fusion GPS. So by definition, it can’t all be for that research.

* Leaving out the first two points makes the Times piece seem quite misleading to me. In a different category is another detail left out. As the Post notes, the Democrats stopped funding the Fusion GPS the day before the election. But Steele had already shared his findings with the FBI because he was so alarmed by what he had found. The FBI was sufficiently disturbed and confident in Steele’s work that they agreed to continue funding his work. (They eventually stopped once Steele’s name became public.) This is highly relevant information for determining the quality and credibility of Steele’s findings. But it doesn’t appear in the Times report even though the lede of the Times report focuses squarely on Republican accusations about Steele and Fusion GPS.

Ringo
 
Upvote 0

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,868
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single

The fact that it has been publicly known for more than a year that the Fusion GPS investigation of Chimp’s ties to Russia began with funding from Republicans and was later funded by Democrats. This has been known since David Corn’s report in October 2016 and reported in numerous other reports since. This is never mentioned in the Times article.

That's the claim, yet when congress tried to find out who funded it, it was the Democrats who protected Fusion.
 
Upvote 0

SummerMadness

Senior Veteran
Mar 8, 2006
18,201
11,829
✟331,677.00
Faith
Catholic
That's a knee-jerk reaction because you are ignoring a key fact, it was a Republican-led effort, they initially paid for the report. What is uncovered in these reports is out of their control; the findings are supposed to be the whole point of the investigation.

That findings in the report were paid for by both parties only further validates them. And just because everything has not been confirmed (yet), does not make the findings bogus. But we'll soon be hearing the tweet storm giving the 45's worshipers and bot-supporters marching orders for the continued disinformation campaign.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FreeinChrist
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
28,641
15,968
✟486,396.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Revealing who funded the research.
Weird that democrats would be so interested in hiding the names of the Republicans behind it, but if it makes you feel better... Personally, I'm more interested in finding out if the claims in it are true but I guess if one doesn't any distraction is as good as any other.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FreeinChrist
Upvote 0

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,868
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Weird that democrats would be so interested in hiding the names of the Republicans behind it, but if it makes you feel better... Personally, I'm more interested in finding out if the claims in it are true but I guess if one doesn't any distraction is as good as any other.

Because finding out if Fusion is lying would help reach a conclusion on that?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,114
36,455
Los Angeles Area
✟827,175.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Yet more criminal actions by the Clintons, which the corrupt liberals will, no doubt, find excuses to ignore.

Hiring a company to do opposition research? Perfectly legal. For that company to hire a foreign employee? Perfectly legal.

(OTOH, having secret discussions with agents of foreign governments and lying about it may not be perfectly legal. We'll see.)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟82,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hiring a company to do opposition research? Perfectly legal.
Paying a third party to plant fraudulent information on a political opponent is not opposition research. Using that information to launch a year long multi-million dollar investigation into something they knew never happened with the sole intent of damaging a political adversary is fraud. Selling US uranium to Russia in exchange for huge personal paybacks is bribery and treason. Using the resources of the US government to attack political opponents is a disgusting abuse of power and a violation of every oath of office from everyone involved.

If it doesn't bother you that the people who authored the fake dossier spent millions of taxpayer dollars to investigate what they knew was a lie doesn't bother you then please do not post to me again ever.
 
Upvote 0

Ringo84

Separation of Church and State expert
Jul 31, 2006
19,228
5,252
A Cylon Basestar
Visit site
✟121,289.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Paying a third party to plant fraudulent information on a political opponent is not opposition research. Using that information to launch a year long multi-million dollar investigation into something they knew never happened with the sole intent of damaging a political adversary is fraud.

The uranium deal story was planted by an opposition research firm by Breitbart and Bannon:

https://www.salon.com/2017/10/25/ho...-ginned-up-the-hillary-clinton-uranium-story/

Caroline O. on Twitter

Selling US uranium to Russia in exchange for huge personal paybacks is bribery and treason.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Using the resources of the US government to attack political opponents is a disgusting abuse of power and a violation of every oath of office from everyone involved.

Trump warns John McCain: 'Be careful ... I fight back' - CNNPolitics
Trump attacks San Juan mayor over hurricane response - CNNPolitics
https://nypost.com/2017/10/16/trump-attacks-democrats-as-tax-reform-obstructionists/
Trump Attacks Warriors’ Curry. LeBron James’s Retort: ‘U Bum.’
Trump Mocks Mika Brzezinski; Says She Was ‘Bleeding Badly From a Face-Lift’


etc. etc.

You were saying?
Ringo
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Aryeh Jay
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,396
15,479
✟1,106,553.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I have no idea, is it legal to use campaign funds for something like this. I assume it was campaign funds being used.
What other funds would be used to dig up dirt on an opponent?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums