No point reading further since none of the above is true. You might learn the above through reading pseudo history, but actual history demonstrates the above claims to be completely unfounded.
That is the trouble with the Roman religious institutions, they refuse to acknowledge actual history, and keep trying to rewrite it...even the Bible which is clear in describing the Roman religious institution is under attack by Rome as well, and subject to rewriting at the whim of popes, who place themselves in place of God, himself..
Still waiting for you to post your sources.
from the above site:
Maybe if that site used more space to uplift faith of believers instead trashing Catholicism with lies, I might take it seriously. Nothing it says about the Catholic Church is true. The end times obsession and Revelation obsession is unbalanced and unhealthy. This kind of hate is toxic and addictive, a kind of spiritual inappropriate contentography. Only the Holy Spirit can heal you, not arguing in forums.
from the above site:
Satan countered by empowering the Jesuits of Rome, who are a military organization, to take control of the Vatican. The Jesuit General, the Black Pope, who is the False Prophet, controls the White Pope; as is using the Vatican to gather the world under his power....
...The Jesuits are using the city-state corporation of Vatican City to control the world’s religious and political leaders. It is using its city-state corporation of the City of London to control the world’s financial and trade organizations. And it’s using its city-state corporation of the District of Columbia, which is not part of the United States, to control the world’s intelligence agencies and military powers.
Paranoid funnymentalist bigotry is not scholarly, it's brain damage.
You sling those terms around quite casually, I've noticed. I find that disconcerting because those are pretty serious charges. I mean, those are pretty much the worst things certain types of fundamentalists can call anybody. Considering that only one person in all of history will fit the fundamentalist view of the Antichrist literally and perfectly, the law of numbers says that accusing any given person of being the Antichrist is a mathematical improbability (or even a mathematical absurdity). So your odds of being wrong are quite high.
This guy explicitly rejects the Trinity. If you agree with his theology then you are posting in the wrong forum.
