John 22-71 a case for Calvinism?

Monk Brendan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2016
4,636
2,875
72
Phoenix, Arizona
Visit site
✟294,430.00
Country
United States
Faith
Melkite Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I don't see that this is even a specifically Calvinist point of view, though it's certainly the answer R C Sproul gave when one of my classmates asked the question.

It may not be specifically out of the mouth of Calvin. However, why would God make us try, weep, beg, intercede, etc. to get a soul into heaven. If that soul is ELECT, then it's going to happen, no matter what I do. But if that same soul is NOT elect, then no amount of reason, prayer, or anything that I can do is going to get them into heaven.

AND BTW, RC Sproul is NOT in the Canon of the Bible. If I can't quote the Ancient Fathers of Christianity, then you can't quote anything not sola scriptura.
 
Upvote 0

hedrick

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 8, 2009
20,250
10,567
New Jersey
✟1,148,008.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
I've been to all sorts of churches, including Calvinist, and I've never seen ANYTHING even close to that. Some churches will trot out wafers and grape juice, and maybe someone will pray, but in the explanation, they refer to the actions as a symbol, instead of the real thing.
Sort of. Here's the epiclesis from the current PCUSA communion service:

"Gracious God,
pour out your Holy Spirit upon us
and upon these your gifts of bread and wine,
that the bread we break
and the cup we bless
may be the communion of the body and blood of Christ.
By your Spirit unite us with the living Christ
and with all who are baptized in his name,
that we may be one in ministry in every place.
As this bread is Christ’s body for us,
send us out to be the body of Christ in the world."

You could accuse this of receptionism, but not of failing to present the real presence of the body and blood with us. It's actually more explicit than its model, which is the Anaphora of the Holy Tradition. Lutheran services would be at least as explicit, probably more so.
 
Upvote 0

hedrick

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 8, 2009
20,250
10,567
New Jersey
✟1,148,008.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
It may not be specifically out of the mouth of Calvin. However, why would God make us try, weep, beg, intercede, etc. to get a soul into heaven. If that soul is ELECT, then it's going to happen, no matter what I do.
No, that's not how election works. Election includes the fact that God has arranged for what is necessary to bring the person to Christ. So we're the way in which election works. God can certainly convert people directly, as with Paul. But he commonly works through other people.
 
Upvote 0

Citizen of the Kingdom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2006
44,346
14,507
Vancouver
Visit site
✟311,047.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Forgive me, but I don't see them using the Eucharist. Using the clear text of the verse, there must be the Body and Blood of Jesus--the Real Presence, if you will. I've been to all sorts of churches, including Calvinist, and I've never seen ANYTHING even close to that. Some churches will trot out wafers and grape juice, and maybe someone will pray, but in the explanation, they refer to the actions as a symbol, instead of the real thing.
Wouldn't the real thing be Jesus' actual presence in spirit form rather than what some call actual bread and wine? It seems that the type of thinking that substitutes Jesus' presence with the substance of bread and wine is forgoing the actual substance of God with us. When it really is symbolic of Him...
 
Upvote 0

Citizen of the Kingdom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2006
44,346
14,507
Vancouver
Visit site
✟311,047.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
But first I want to tell you why. I was watching a documentary movie abt priests who were missionaries to some far away land. The priests were being killed off and the Christians left had no priest so were living in fear of damnation. When a priest arrived they flocked around to confess and all but ..... they just had to call on Christ. Anyway the priest died a horrible death and all I could think of was that it could have been prevented. End of rant.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
On the other hand, if we truly love our neighbor, then aren't we BOUND by that love to share with them the love we have with God? Obviously! There are lost souls out there, and it is up to US to lead them to Christ. If we DON'T do it, then we are just as bound for hell as they are.
Acts 18: NKJV

9 Now the Lord spoke to Paul in the night by a vision, “Do not be afraid, but speak, and do not keep silent; 10 for I am with you, and no one will attack you to hurt you; for I have many people in this city.” 11 And he continued there a year and six months, teaching the word of God among them.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: St_Worm2
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,453
✟84,588.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Forgive me, but I don't see them using the Eucharist. Using the clear text of the verse, there must be the Body and Blood of Jesus--the Real Presence, if you will. I've been to all sorts of churches, including Calvinist, and I've never seen ANYTHING even close to that. Some churches will trot out wafers and grape juice, and maybe someone will pray, but in the explanation, they refer to the actions as a symbol, instead of the real thing.
As Hedrick indicated above - communion in reformed churches is taken a bit more seriously than in many protestant churches. Probably the solemnity of the occasion in Reformed churches developed because of their arriving so soon after virtually all of the Western Church were Catholic with their sacramental emphasis.

But you are right in saying that we do not believe in the literal body and blood of Jesus Christ in the bread and wine.

I won't re litigate that issue with you here except to just say that the real life body of Jesus was breaking the bread and pouring the wine and saying "do this in remembrance of me".

Some see it as "consubstantiation" But none see it as transubstantiation as you apparently do.

Again - I won't argue with you here. You can find entire articles and books galore on the argument (enough to keep you busy until the second comming).

I only wanted to point out that (contrary to what you indicated) Protestants do believe what Jesus said. They just believe it in a different way than you apparently do.

Context is very important to interpretation - don't you agree? And we Protestants say that the context in which Christ uttered those words indicate something other than transubstantiation.

I realize that you place tradition on a level the same or even higher than the written Word whereas we do the opposite. So we will obviously never agree on this.

So long as your gospel in simplicity has to do with a personal trust in the finished work of Christ at Calvary and does not include ritual in order to achieve salvation in the most basic sense - we have no problem.

If you are relying on ceremony to save you (particularly if it has to be administered by a priest other than Jesus Christ) - then of course our differences run a bit deeper than just the Eucharist vs. communion and transubstantiation vs. remembrance.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

friend of

A private in Gods army
Site Supporter
Dec 28, 2016
5,559
3,921
provincial
✟760,477.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
We also believe that all who desire to know God and who come to saving faith in Him, will be saved .. Romans 10:9-10; John 5:24. No exceptions! There will be none in Hell who have heard, believed and trusted in Jesus. NONE.

Hey St_worm2 thanks for posting in my thread. I was just wondering, how would you reconcil a passage like Matthew 7:21 with the above post?

"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven."

Would John 6:40 be an answer here?

Blessings to you and yours!
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,182
1,808
✟800,884.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
So in essence are you saying that Judus was not 'God taught' even tho he was chosen by Jesus?
Not sure how you got this from what I said? Judas was given the very best opportunity he could have to accept Jesus/God's charity.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Citizen of the Kingdom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2006
44,346
14,507
Vancouver
Visit site
✟311,047.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
((Not sure how you got this from what I said? Judas was given the very best opportunity he could have to accept Jesus/God's charity.))
((So in essence are you saying that Judus was not 'God taught' even tho he was chosen by Jesus?))

I'll see if I can show what I mean by going thru your original post...

John 6:22-71 is not meant to be an easy passage and it drove most of Christ’s followers away and even drives people today away. It would take lots of explaining and the rest of Christ’s life and death to help these people to become followers.
A good start that Judas could be the topic when Christ taught him everything but still he did not learn. Not having been actually reborn (like Nicodemus was not) would mean for Judas that it was impossible for him to understand heavenly things.

First and foremost you have to realize this was said specifically to the group of people being addressed at that time and place. We need to understand the truths Jesus was trying to communicate to that specific group and not just take it like it is a sermon to us today without need of explaining.
Secondly we need to keep in mind how Christ responds to questions and comments, because Jesus does not “address” the verbalized comments or questions unless that is truly what is on their heart, but Jesus knows what is on their heart and address that specifically to help them move to the next spiritual level we might say. The response of Jesus may not be understandable by those being addressed at the time, but they will understand later even after the Kingdom comes to them on the day of Pentecost and even after that.
As was Jesus' way
The masses are a very fickle group, so Jesus is not trying to amass a large following of them at this time, but the emphasis will always be on the small group (12 and 120).
In the end we have this:
66 From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him. 67 “You do not want to leave too, do you?” Jesus asked the Twelve.

Are we saying these disciples who turned back at this time are lost forever? Was Nicodemus lost forever after going to Christ at night?

Do you think Jesus looked at the hearts of all those and found only 11 elect, so He drives off the rest?

The encounter in John 6 comes fairly early in Christ’s ministry, so how much knowledge of Christ can the person have to build his/her faith on and what did they “believe” about Christ at this time?
His disciples were made up of many besides the twelve, some followed sometimes (as did the twelve at first also) till the end of His ministry when there was a band of followers who went everywhere with Him. The ones mentioned here were focused on the flesh only and it's needs. I think Jesus addresses the need for that to be put to death under no uncertain terms.
26 Jesus answered them, “Very truly, I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves.
27 Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For it is on him that God the Father has set his seal.”​
Work in renewing the mind and aligning the spirit not on the flesh. Judas was very committed to the money bag and the flesh needs it fulfilled.
Christ needs to get his group of followers down to those truly committed, since there is a long road ahead and He does not need lots “fans” needing lots of babying (He has enough of that with the 12).
Christ is not going to lie to the group or order them away, but, like God does, will allow them to leave of their own free will (it will be by there choice and they will not be able to later blame Jesus).
He had the prime example of 'their kind' in Judas
We talk about “works” and “faith only” but Jesus explains it with: 28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? 29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
Believe is the verb of the noun “Faith” so it means the same thing.
Judas's faith was not as Peter's "where else can we go"`because Judas did eventually go elsewhere outside of the group to enact his own plans.
“Believe or faith” is not really a “work” you do (doing something to earn a wage) and the people would not recognize it as a “work” the same as we do not recognize faith as a work. In the Kingdom that comes with Pentecost (and has always really been the case), faith will be the only thing the person does bring to relationship which is not a “work” as defined by man.
Faith is also God-given so would be the beginning of God-taught it would seem.
They ask a strait forward honest question which Jesus answers directly, but they asked “What must we do…” and Jesus did not answer “you can do nothing”, which seems to be the correct Calvin answer?
I would think so.
The “ye believe” is referring to those who asked Him and they will also walk away, so could they have believe or is Jesus misleading them by telling them to do something they cannot do?
Let’s look at your specific verses:
37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
And
39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.
They asked Him
30 So they said to him, “What sign are you going to give us then, so that we may see it and believe you? What work are you performing?
He answered
35 Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.
36 But I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not believe.

Placing that crowd outside of those who saw Him and believed. They only saw the physical and not the spiritual bread.
If someone leaves it will not be Christ’s fault since He did not cast them out or lose them, so the question is who is the Father “giving to Jesus”?
32…. it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven.
40. For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life
45. …They will all be taught by God. Everyone who has heard the Father and learned from him comes to me.
All those that hear, see, learn and believe come (are given) to Jesus and it is the Father’s doing, since it is God who “taught” them.
God opened spiritual eyes.
This is not saying those God implanted with faith and knowledge or a soft heart, but who were taught and believed.
This is perhaps where I have misunderstood, because in this sense Judas would have been God-taught by the fact that he was Jesus-taught but the implication I had first gotten from it was that it was not spiritually discerned. Thinking about it further I would have to say at this early point in the ministry non of them had spiritual discernment. Yet I believe that the 11 did think they were following God`s appointed way even at this time.
The question is thus: “How did this faith come about?”
All mature adults have a God given faith in something or someone, but not everyone directs that faith/trust toward the creator (again faith is not work).
Next verses;
44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
“draw” is the same word “invite” and we know everyone at the banquet has been invited (drawn there by the Master), but some refused the draw (invitation) of their own free will.
^True
Next verse:
64. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Jesus knows like God knows who will be saved and who will be lost, but again it will not be God’s or Christ’s fault since they do their part perfectly and really treat everyone equally, giving the same opportunities for the willing individual to fulfill his/her earthly objective.
Again the person must be taught by God and believe.
Individual choice
Next verse:
70 Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?
So did Jesus make Judas hell bound or did Jesus do all He could to help Judas not to be lost, but it was still up to Judas? Jesus knew Judas would never repent, but that did not relieve Jesus of His actions toward Judas to help him.
I don`t think that the mind of Judas was able to bring the flesh under control because of not being spiritually connected in love to Jesus. IE: he betrayed him with a kiss as the ultimate enactment.
These verses in John 6 do not take man’s free will ability away, but tell us more about what God and Christ are doing, their part in the process with “faith” being man’s part.
Agree


Not sure how you got this from what I said? Judas was given the very best opportunity he could have to accept Jesus/God's charity.
 
Upvote 0

Monk Brendan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2016
4,636
2,875
72
Phoenix, Arizona
Visit site
✟294,430.00
Country
United States
Faith
Melkite Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
transubstantiation

This is just a word thought up by Church fathers in the past to describe HOW the change from bread and wine to Body and Blood happens. The Orthodox and Eastern Catholics (like me) say that it is a mystery HOW it happens, we just know that it does.
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,453
✟84,588.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
This is just a word thought up by Church fathers in the past to describe HOW the change from bread and wine to Body and Blood happens. The Orthodox and Eastern Catholics (like me) say that it is a mystery HOW it happens, we just know that it does.
Protestants generally believe that the context in which Christ said, "This is my body" etc. demands a spiritual interpretation of the bread and wine and not a literal interpretation.

It seems to be obvious that Jesus was not handing them a finger and telling the disciples that it was somehow mystically now a bread stick. Excuse the crude example. But frankly to me it's not even anywhere near as crude as transubstantiation taking place at the command of a special priesthood here on earth. (I'm not sure how Orthodox differs from R.C. on this.)

Again- I have no particular problem with anyone believing something different than I do about the bread and the wine. We can agree to disagree about it.

But to me the issue is whether salvation is administered in any way through the taking of substances, particularly which need to have been blessed by a special group of people here on earth.

If a person's faith for justification before the Father is in the activities of any man (whether himself or a special priesthood) other than Jesus Christ who is seated at the right hand of the Father - it is not true saving faith in the work of Christ on our behalf.

Protestants such as I am, would warn everyone who calls himself a Christian to examine himself to see if he is in the faith. To us, "the faith" is the fact that Jesus accomplished all that is required for our salvation in the giving ONE TIME here on earth His body and blood at Calvary for the entire world.

We believe that those who have communicated in a personal way to the Father their faith in that accomplishment on their behalf are, right now, seated with Christ in Heaven as a part of His eternal body - never again to come into the kind of condemnation they were once in before God.

Others (I hope not you) have a "hope" that they will someday arrive at that point if they do certain things here on earth.

Faith is the "assurance of things hoped for" and not the hope itself. The difference (justification before God wise) is the difference between night and day. One is religion the other is saving faith.

Even though we have our differences in some areas of theology, I sincerely hope that it isn't so in the critical area of salvation which pertains to an eternal Heaven vs. an eternal Hell.

I hope to meet you on the other side of this life. Whether or not we do, as I see things, will depend on whether you agree with me in this vital area of soteriology.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,182
1,808
✟800,884.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
A good start that Judas could be the topic when Christ taught him everything but still he did not learn. Not having been actually reborn (like Nicodemus was not) would mean for Judas that it was impossible for him to understand heavenly things.

If your saying: “Not having been actually reborn (like Nicodemus was not) would mean for Judas that it was impossible for him to understand heavenly things” than none of the 12 were “reborn” since none of them were understanding what Jesus was saying?

Why do you say “Judas was not reborn like Nicodemus was not reborn and the other 11 were reborn”?

Was it by Judas free will choice he refused to be reborn or was it God’s fault?

His disciples were made up of many besides the twelve, some followed sometimes (as did the twelve at first also) till the end of His ministry when there was a band of followers who went everywhere with Him. The ones mentioned here were focused on the flesh only and it's needs. I think Jesus addresses the need for that to be put to death under no uncertain terms.
26 Jesus answered them, “Very truly, I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves.
27 Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For it is on him that God the Father has set his seal.”​
Work in renewing the mind and aligning the spirit not on the flesh. Judas was very committed to the money bag and the flesh needs it fulfilled.

I do not know how different Judas was from the rest of the 12, since they were arguing among themselves for the best positions in what they thought was to be Jesus kingdom on earth at Jerusalem all the way up to the last day and they also will all leave him.

Could Judas have fallen to his knees and pleaded for forgiveness to God, Jesus and everyone else and been forgiven and not killed himself or did God not provide Judas with that opportunity?

He had the prime example of 'their kind' in Judas

“Their kind in Judas”, I would say is our kind prior to accepting God’s forgiveness, so what is the difference?



Judas's faith was not as Peter's "where else can we go"`because Judas did eventually go elsewhere outside of the group to enact his own plans.

Wait, they all ran off.

Peter denied Christ three times so was Peter just way better than Judas at that time?

Faith is also God-given so would be the beginning of God-taught it would seem.

God provides instinctively all mature adults with a faith ability (so yes it is God provided), but directing that “faith” toward a benevolent Creator makes all the difference.

They asked Him
30 So they said to him, “What sign are you going to give us then, so that we may see it and believe you? What work are you performing?
He answered
35 Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.
36 But I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not believe.

Placing that crowd outside of those who saw Him and believed. They only saw the physical and not the spiritual bread.

Peter said: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69 We have come to believe and to know that you are the Holy One of God.”

Peter and the other 11 are seeing the physical also, but have seen enough to believe Jesus is also the “Holy One of God”.

Are you saying everyone up to this point who saw Christ and did not follower were lost, because James (Christ’s brother) was not following at this time?

God opened spiritual eyes.

Just as the prodigal son in a dead state (by Christ’s definition of dead) the nonbelievers can come to their senses and humbly accept God’s charity.

We need to quit blaming God for not “opening some nonbeliever’s eyes?

This is perhaps where I have misunderstood, because in this sense Judas would have been God-taught by the fact that he was Jesus-taught but the implication I had first gotten from it was that it was not spiritually discerned. Thinking about it further I would have to say at this early point in the ministry non of them had spiritual discernment. Yet I believe that the 11 did think they were following God`s appointed way even at this time.

Judas may also have believed he was following God’s appointed, but that does not keep people from trying to take advantage of the situation just like some wanted to be on Christ’s left and right hand in the “earthly” kingdom. The 12 seemed to be jockeying for earthly positions.

I don`t think that the mind of Judas was able to bring the flesh under control because of not being spiritually connected in love to Jesus. IE: he betrayed him with a kiss as the ultimate enactment.
Agree

I try to put myself in Judas’ shoes especially when I was heavily seeking finical rewards. Judas has seen Jesus get out of every tight situation he had been in and could easily have come to realize Jesus could never be taken by anyone. So, how can Judas use that knowledge to make some money, especially take some money from those hypocritical religious leaders? It would not hurt anyone if Judas led these worthless leaders to Jesus and allowed Jesus to shut them down again.
 
Upvote 0

TheSeabass

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2015
1,855
358
✟47,754.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Acts 18: NKJV

9 Now the Lord spoke to Paul in the night by a vision, “Do not be afraid, but speak, and do not keep silent; 10 for I am with you, and no one will attack you to hurt you; for I have many people in this city.” 11 And he continued there a year and six months, teaching the word of God among them.

Acts 18:9 "Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace:"
Acts 18:10 "For I am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in this city."
Acts 18:11 "And he continued there a year and six months, teaching the word of God among them."

God knows the heart of men and foreknew that when the gospel was preached in the city, there would be "many people" in the city that would choose to believe it and become Christians. The Lord tells Paul in verse 9 to "speak" to the people in the city. The language of verses 9 and 10 infers:
--those people in the city would not be saved unless and until the word of God was first preached to them.
--just the preaching of the word could "prick" (Acts 2:37)-convict their hearts whereby they could be saved.


John 10:16 "And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd."
Again, similar language is used where Christ already calls the Gentiles His sheep, His possession. The Lord foreknew that when the Gentiles "hear my voice" that there would be those of the Gentiles that would choose to believe and become Christians. The language infers that this future "one fold" made up of Jew and Gentile would not exist unless and until the Gentiles were preached to, i.e., "hear my voice". And again, just the simple preaching of the gospel was all that would be needed to bring the Gentiles into this "one fold"....no unconditional, random election of God before the world began would be needed, no 'regeneration' by the Holy Spirit first acting upon their hearts would be needed..... but simply preaching the gospel.

Romans 4:17 "(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were."
Due to God's foreknowledge, Paul said that God can sometimes "calleth those things which be not as though they were" just as God called Abraham the father of many nations before Isaac, through whom the promise was made, was even born.
As in Acts 18:10 and John 10:16 God knew the disposition of men's hearts and foreknew they would obey the word when preached to them therefore God already calls them His while those people were still living in unbelief, sin, wickedness.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Citizen of the Kingdom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2006
44,346
14,507
Vancouver
Visit site
✟311,047.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
If your saying: “Not having been actually reborn (like Nicodemus was not) would mean for Judas that it was impossible for him to understand heavenly things” than none of the 12 were “reborn” since none of them were understanding what Jesus was saying?

Why do you say “Judas was not reborn like Nicodemus was not reborn and the other 11 were reborn”?

Was it by Judas free will choice he refused to be reborn or was it God’s fault?
Nicodemus was a learned man who seemed to be looking for further instructions on how to improve himself from the man of God. The rebirth was not a given at that time so none could understand His 'heavenly speech'. Judas differed from Nicodemus at Christ's death. One showing love at the burial and the other killing himself. The difference seems to be in their nature. That nature was what Jesus was saying to Nicodemus that needed to change to a new birth. It produced a change in all but Judas.

I do not know how different Judas was from the rest of the 12, since they were arguing among themselves for the best positions in what they thought was to be Jesus kingdom on earth at Jerusalem all the way up to the last day and they also will all leave him.

Could Judas have fallen to his knees and pleaded for forgiveness to God, Jesus and everyone else and been forgiven and not killed himself or did God not provide Judas with that opportunity?
I think arguing for position moves away from flesh and onto intellect ... and had they the knowledge of what that kingdom entailed they would have thought about it differently, I`m sure. They were still not spiritually minded.


“Their kind in Judas”, I would say is our kind prior to accepting God’s forgiveness, so what is the difference?
None. All would have been unregenerated at that time.


Wait, they all ran off.

Peter denied Christ three times so was Peter just way better than Judas at that time?
Running off from a band of soldiers is not the same as leading the soldiers to Him. Fear vs betrayal .. let me think ... ya I would say so.

God provides instinctively all mature adults with a faith ability (so yes it is God provided), but directing that “faith” toward a benevolent Creator makes all the difference.
How is that directing carried out?

Peter said: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69 We have come to believe and to know that you are the Holy One of God.”

Peter and the other 11 are seeing the physical also, but have seen enough to believe Jesus is also the “Holy One of God”.

Are you saying everyone up to this point who saw Christ and did not follower were lost, because James (Christ’s brother) was not following at this time?
What does James the brother of Christ have to do with this conversation :confused:

Just as the prodigal son in a dead state (by Christ’s definition of dead) the nonbelievers can come to their senses and humbly accept God’s charity.

We need to quit blaming God for not “opening some nonbeliever’s eyes?
God taught can only mean revelation from God to mankind. I don`t know why you object to saying it as God opening spiritual eyes ... we should blame the fact of not responding to revealed heavenly things as what is blamable!

Judas may also have believed he was following God’s appointed, but that does not keep people from trying to take advantage of the situation just like some wanted to be on Christ’s left and right hand in the “earthly” kingdom. The 12 seemed to be jockeying for earthly positions.
I was giving examples of fleshly pursuits on the disciples that Jesus turned away, but this is an intellectual pursuit that is an improvement from just wanting to be fed. They had aspirations for the kingdom of God. Like when Mary poured the oil for Jesus`burial Judas`mind was only on the money it could have brought in.

I try to put myself in Judas’ shoes especially when I was heavily seeking finical rewards. Judas has seen Jesus get out of every tight situation he had been in and could easily have come to realize Jesus could never be taken by anyone. So, how can Judas use that knowledge to make some money, especially take some money from those hypocritical religious leaders? It would not hurt anyone if Judas led these worthless leaders to Jesus and allowed Jesus to shut them down again.
Judas merely held the money bag to distribute to the poor, it says nothing of him gathering revenue from any other than their own who contributed to their cause. (the women disciples fi)
I think that Jesus knew his nature and so gave him that temptation in an attempt for Judas to overcome the nature of a thief which he was unable to do.
 
Upvote 0

Monk Brendan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2016
4,636
2,875
72
Phoenix, Arizona
Visit site
✟294,430.00
Country
United States
Faith
Melkite Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
It seems to be obvious that Jesus was not handing them a finger and telling the disciples that it was somehow mystically now a bread stick. Excuse the crude example. But frankly to me it's not even anywhere near as crude as transubstantiation taking place at the command of a special priesthood here on earth. (I'm not sure how Orthodox differs from R.C. on this.)

You've got that upside down. It would be Jesus handing the Apostles a bread stick, etc.

But you don't even listen to the clear text of the words. HOW PLAIN COULD HE SAY IT? This is my Body! This is my Blood!

But if you don't want to listen to the clear words of the Bible, then you're free to go your way, and I'm free to go mine.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Acts 18:9 "Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace:"
Acts 18:10 "For I am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in this city."
Acts 18:11 "And he continued there a year and six months, teaching the word of God among them."

God knows the heart of men and foreknew that when the gospel was preached in the city, there would be "many people" in the city that would choose to believe it and become Christians. The Lord tells Paul in verse 9 to "speak" to the people in the city. The language of verses 9 and 10 infers:
--those people in the city would not be saved unless and until the word of God was first preached to them.
--just the preaching of the word could "prick" (Acts 2:37)-convict their hearts whereby they could be saved.


John 10:16 "And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd."
Again, similar language is used where Christ already calls the Gentiles His sheep, His possession. The Lord foreknew that when the Gentiles "hear my voice" that there would be those of the Gentiles that would choose to believe and become Christians. The language infers that this future "one fold" made up of Jew and Gentile would not exist unless and until the Gentiles were preached to, i.e., "hear my voice". And again, just the simple preaching of the gospel was all that would be needed to bring the Gentiles into this "one fold"....no unconditional, random election of God before the world began would be needed, no 'regeneration' by the Holy Spirit first acting upon their hearts would be needed..... but simply preaching the gospel.

Romans 4:17 "(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were."
Due to God's foreknowledge, Paul said that God can sometimes "calleth those things which be not as though they were" just as God called Abraham the father of many nations before Isaac, through whom the promise was made, was even born.
As in Acts 18:10 and John 10:16 God knew the disposition of men's hearts and foreknew they would obey the word when preached to them therefore God already calls them His while those people were still living in unbelief, sin, wickedness.
Indeed God knew He had people who would respond to the Gospel.
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,453
✟84,588.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
You've got that upside down. It would be Jesus handing the Apostles a bread stick, etc.
No I think I got it right side up. What did I say?
Marvin Knox said:
It seems to be obvious that Jesus was not handing them a finger and telling the disciples that it was somehow mystically now a bread stick.

But you don't even listen to the clear text of the words. HOW PLAIN COULD HE SAY IT? This is my Body! This is my Blood!
No - it's you who don't listen to what Jesus said.

"Jesus answered them and said, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate of the loaves and were filled. Do not work for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you, for on Him the Father, God, has set His seal.” Therefore they said to Him, “What shall we do, so that we may work the works of God?” Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent.” So they said to Him, “What then do You do for a sign, so that we may see, and believe You? What work do You perform? Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread out of heaven to eat.’” Jesus then said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, it is not Moses who has given you the bread out of heaven, but it is My Father who gives you the true bread out of heaven. For the bread of God is that which comes down out of heaven, and gives life to the world.” Then they said to Him, “Lord, always give us this bread.”

Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life; he who comes to Me will not hunger, and he who believes in Me will never thirst. But I said to you that you have seen Me, and yet do not believe. All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out. For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. This is the will of Him who sent Me, that of all that He has given Me I lose nothing, but raise it up on the last day. For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life, and I Myself will raise him up on the last day.”

Therefore the Jews were grumbling about Him, because He said, “I am the bread that came down out of heaven.” They were saying, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How does He now say, ‘I have come down out of heaven’?” Jesus answered and said to them, “Do not grumble among yourselves. No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day. It is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught of God.’ Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father, comes to Me. Not that anyone has seen the Father, except the One who is from God; He has seen the Father. Truly, truly, I say to you, he who believes has eternal life. I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread which comes down out of heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread also which I will give for the life of the world is My flesh.”

Then the Jews began to argue with one another, saying, “How can this man give us His flesh to eat?” So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves. He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him. As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats Me, he also will live because of Me. This is the bread which came down out of heaven; not as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live forever.”

These things He said in the synagogue as He taught in Capernaum.

Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this said, “This is a difficult statement; who can listen to it?” But Jesus, conscious that His disciples grumbled at this, said to them, “Does this cause you to stumble? What then if you see the Son of Man ascending to where He was before? It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and are life. But there are some of you who do not believe.” For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were who did not believe, and who it was that would betray Him. And He was saying, “For this reason I have said to you, that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted him from the Father.”John 6:26-65


"The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you—they are full of the Spirit and life." John 6:63

Look at the context of scripture and let the scriptures interpret the scriptures.

Of course, since you put tradition on the same level or above the scriptures we likely have nothing more to argue which will avail anything.

Again - so long as your trust for ultimate salvation is in the finished work of Christ at Calvary, once and for all, we have no issue. If not - then it is not me you have issue with but it is the Lord Himself at the judgment with whom you can debate whether you were in the faith or not the practice of your religion.

I notice that you did not address the meat of my post.

You either believe you are saved and seated with Christ in Heaven or you only have a religious hope that you will be someday.

Faith is the assurance of hope and not hope itself.

You are obviously involved in a very old and widely practiced form of Christianity. But you need to do what the reformers did and what the Bereans did before them.

Examine yourself to be sure you are in the faith.

You'd be wise to follow their example.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Lily of Valleys

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2017
786
425
Australia
✟68,600.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But you don't even listen to the clear text of the words. HOW PLAIN COULD HE SAY IT? This is my Body! This is my Blood!

But if you don't want to listen to the clear words of the Bible, then you're free to go your way, and I'm free to go mine.
Have you asked God to give you living water? If you drink of this water you shall never thirst, and the water should become in you a well of water springing up to eternal life. They are clear words of the Bible:

Jesus answered and said to her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, ‘Give Me a drink,’ you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water.” She said to Him, “Sir, You have nothing to draw with and the well is deep; where then do You get that living water? You are not greater than our father Jacob, are You, who gave us the well, and drank of it himself and his sons and his cattle?” Jesus answered and said to her, “Everyone who drinks of this water will thirst again; but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him shall never thirst; but the water that I will give him will become in him a well of water springing up to eternal life.” (John 4:10-14 NASB)
 
Upvote 0