Ireneaus on End Times

Status
Not open for further replies.

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,937
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
The greatest error of modern Dispensational Theology is the claim that modern Jews will be saved outside of the Church, during a future time period.

There is no Plan B, outside of the Church.

.

We teach the first because the scriptures explicitly teach it. For no theory on the timing of the rapture places it after the Lord comes in power and glory to judge the world. This is because there is absolutely zero scriptural justification for even imagining that the rapture takes place after that time. But Isaiah 66 very plainly teaches that the restoration of Israel to its ancient homeland will take place after that event.

And Dispensationalism has never taught, implied, or even imagined, that God ever had a "plan A" and a "Plan B." It is an essential part of Dispensationalism that all the dispensations are components of God's work on a single master plan that was already in place before the seven days of Genesis 1.
 
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,725
2,781
USA
✟101,174.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Many Dispensationalists have claimed that the Book of Matthew was written to the Jews. This is a true statement, because the book was written to the Jewish Church.
Christ announced His Church in Matthew chapter 16 and the Great Commission to the Church is at the end of Matthew's Gospel.
Why does this matter?
Because many Dispensationalists have claimed that the Book of Matthew is not for the Church.


Dispensationalists must ignore the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ in Hebrews 8:6-13, and specifically applied to the Church in Hebrews 12:22-24, and 2 Corinthians 3:6-8.

Some Dispensationalists have recently claimed that the New Covenant is very important to their doctrine.
However, they have yet to provide any evidence for this fact in what they have written.


The greatest error of modern Dispensational Theology is the claim that modern Jews will be saved outside of the Church, during a future time period.

Romans chapter 11 says otherwise.
The Olive Tree is a symbol of the New Covenant Church made up of Israelites and Gentiles grafted together into one tree.
Based on Romans 11, the only salvation for those broken off of the Olive Tree, is to be grafted back into the tree, through faith in Christ.


There is no Plan B, outside of the Church.

.
There is no plan B outside of THE GOSPEL
 
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,725
2,781
USA
✟101,174.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes. That is the concept taught in Dispensationalism.
What will be preached after the church age but the same GOSPEL

And the second group of workers/witnesses will be believing Jews

Yes?

(I am not mentioning or. even Considering the two witnesses here)
 
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,725
2,781
USA
✟101,174.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We teach the first because the scriptures explicitly teach it. For no theory on the timing of the rapture places it after the Lord comes in power and glory to judge the world. This is because there is absolutely zero scriptural justification for even imagining that the rapture takes place after that time. But Isaiah 66 very plainly teaches that the restoration of Israel to its ancient homeland will take place after that event.

And Dispensationalism has never taught, implied, or even imagined, that God ever had a "plan A" and a "Plan B." It is an essential part of Dispensationalism that all the dispensations are components of God's work on a single master plan that was already in place before the seven days of Genesis 1.
How do you know that the rapture happen before the restoration begins?

And when you say the restoration

You are talking about the physical restoration of Israel since the unbelieving Jew will enter into this work during the time of the tribulation
Specifically, the temple will be rebuilt and sacrifices will be reinstated

And who do you think will be killed as hinderers of this work

But the believing Christian

You believe the restoration will happen after the rapture

But that isn't what Daniel noted
when he said it will be rebuilt during troublous times
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,725
2,781
USA
✟101,174.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Actually pronoun usage is a very strong argument in attempting to determine what was actually meant in a statement whose meaning is being debated.

We need to realize that in all languages, "we" and "they" are two entirely different concepts, as are "us" and "them." Now a translator may indeed honestly interchange the words "we" and "us," or the words "they" and "them." But no translator could honestly interchange the words "we" and "they," nor the words "us" and "them."

If Irenaeus meant that the church would be "suddenly caught up" before the "great tribulation," then the change in his ponouns was obviously necessary and appropriate.

If on the other hand he did not mean that "the church" would be "suddenly caught up" before the "great tribulation," the change in pronouns would make no sense whatsoever.

But, to return to the basic comment which we are discussing. The grammatical construction "when A happens, B happens," has two possible meanings. It can mean that A happens before B. Or it can mean that A and B happen at the same time. But it cannot mean that B happens before A.

So it is absolutely clear that Irenaeus was not saying that the "great tribulation" will take place before the church is "suddenly caught up." The grammar simply does not allow this interpretation.

it to return to the A's and B's. It is indeed true that the construction "when A happens, B happens" can mean that A and B happen at the same time. But that meaning is only possible when A and B occupy (at least approximately) the same time intervals. And the construction of this statement by Irenaeus does not allow that interpretation. For Irenaeus clearly taught, further on, that he "great tribulation" would last three and a half years. (See the sections quoted above.) Now an event that happens "suddenly" cannot take place at the same time as an event that last three and a half years.

So both the grammatical construction of this sentence and the change in pronouns that Irenaeus made at this point, both clearly indicate that he was saying that the church would be "suddenly caught up" before the "great tribulation."

But I need to once more stress that I consider it serious bad doctrine to claim that this gives any authority whatsoever to any doctrine. My only reason for pointing these things out is to disprove, as false, the claim that both Dispensationalism in general and and the doctrine of a "rapture" before the "great tribulation," were innovations that were never taught before the 1800s.
Biblewriter,

7 years are determined
If iranaeus notes the 3 1/2 year period as the "great tribulation" that is halfway through the 7 year tribulation which begins with the restoring of Israel

The rapture would have to be mid-trib

But up to that time, many believers will die
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,937
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Biblewriter,

7 years are determined
If iranaeus notes the 3 1/2 year period as the "great tribulation" that is halfway through the 7 year tribulation which begins with the restoring of Israel

The rapture would have to be mid-trib

But up to that tune, many believers will die

If you go back and read what I posted, That is exactly what I said, that in modern terms, the position of Irenaeus would be called Mid trib. But, as he only saw the last half of the week as the "great tribulation," this was pre-trib in his system.

And as a side note, the scriptures only call the last half of the week "great tribulation."
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,937
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,725
2,781
USA
✟101,174.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If you go back and read what I posted, That is exactly what I said, that in modern terms, the position of Irenaeus would be called Mid trib. But, as he only saw the last half of the week as the "great tribulation," this was pre-trib in his system.

Ans as a side note, the scriptures only call the last half of the week "great tribulation."
What you are saying is that like John called "come up here" in Revelation Iraneuas also "saw" the last half of the week from that viewpoint/perspective?
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,937
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
How do you know that the rapture happen before the restoration begins?
I gave the reasons. Read what I posted.

And when you say the restoration

You are talking about the physical restoration of Israel since the unbelieving Jew will enter into this work during the time of the tribulation
Specifically, the temple will be rebuilt and sacrifices will be reinstated

This is not what the scriptures teach. You will not find even one ene]=d time prophecy, anywhere in the entire Bible, that days anything about Judah, that is, "the Jews," returning to the land. The only prophecy that says anything at all about that was about the return from Babylon.

The prophecies about the end time return all say "Israel," not "Judah." There two terms are not synonyms. Judah has two possible meanings. It either refers to the tribe of Judah, or it refers to the southern kingdom of Judah and Benjamin. Israel, likewise, had two meanings, it either meant the entire twelve tribes, or it meant the northern kingdom composed of the ten tribes.

But in the entire Bible, Israel never means Judah, and Judah never means Israel.

And who do you think will be killed as hinderers of this work

But the believing Christian

You believe the restoration will happen after the rapture

But that isn't what Daniel noted
when he said it will be rebuilt during troublous times

You are quoting from the KJV, which reads:
" Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. Daniel 9:25

This is a reference to the times in which the street and the wall were built in ancient times. This took 49 years, seven weeks, the straight of times. then, after an additional sixty -two weeks, Messiah would come. Just as He actually did come, 483 years (7 x 69) after the order went forth.

But I am not the one who said the the return of Israel would take place after the Lord comes "with fire, to render his anger with fury, and his rebuke with flames of fire." This is clearly taught in Isaiah 66.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,725
2,781
USA
✟101,174.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I gave the reasons. Read what I posted.



This is not what the scriptures teach. You will not find even one ene]=d time prophecy, anywhere in the entire Bible, that days anything about Judah, that is, "the Jews," returning to the land. The only prophecy that says anything at all about that was about the return from Babylon.

The prophecies about the end time return all say "Israel," not "Judah." There two terms are not synonyms. Judah has two possible meanings. It either refers to the tribe of Judah, or it refers to the southern kingdom of Judah and Benjamin. Israel, likewise, had two meanings, it either meant the entire twelve tribes, or it meant the northern kingdom composed of the ten tribes.

But in the entire Bible, Israel never means Judah, and Judah never means Israel.



You are quoting from the KJV, which reads:
" Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. Daniel 9:25

This is a reference to the times in which the street and the wall were built in ancient times. This took 49 years, seven weeks, the straight of times. then, after an additional sixty -two weeks, Messiah would come. Just as He actually did come, 483 years (7 x 69) after the order went forth.

But I am not the one who said the the return of Israel would take place after the Lord comes "with fire, to render his anger with fury, and his rebuke with flames of fire." This is clearly taught in Isaiah 66.
Ah forget it

I said nothing about distinguishing a people physically coming into physical Jerusalem

I said physical Jerusalem will be restored and to these unbelieving Jews that requires a temple
 
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,725
2,781
USA
✟101,174.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You sure can I understand deny that currently in Jerusalem there are those who are planning already to rebuild the temple

That will be troublous times for anyone who stands in their way

Because they will think that these are troublers interfering with the work of GOD and many Christians who speak up trying to correct their older unbelieving Jewish brothers will be killed
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,937
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
You sure can I understand deny that currently in Jerusalem there are those who are planning already to rebuild the temple

That will be troublous times for anyone who stands in their way

Because they will think that these are troublers interfering with the work of GOD and many Christians who speak up trying to correct their older unbelieving Jewish brothers will be killed

We have gotten off the subject of this thread, which is what Irenaeus taught. Whether or not he was correct in his teaching is a different subject.

Let's return to the subject, and save discussions of what constitutes correct doctrine for another thread.
 
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,725
2,781
USA
✟101,174.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We have gotten off the subject of this thread, which is what Irenaeus taught. Whether or not he was correct in his teaching is a different subject.

Let's return to the subject, and save discussions of what constitutes correct doctrine for another thread.
No

There is a seven year tribulation
And this fade one will make a covenant which the unbelieving Jews will embrace as wonderful!!the rebuilding of the eaerhky temple

Which is NOT...wonderful

Let us not pass over that part

It's what will cause the "wounds received in the house of my friends"
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,937
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
No

There is a seven year tribulation
And this fade one will make a covenant which the unbelieving Jews will embrace as wonderful!!the rebuilding of the eaerhky temple

Which is NOT...wonderful

Let us not pass over that part

It's what will cause the "wounds received in the house of my friends"
If you wish to discuss these things, start a new thread. I was drawn off into an off topic discussion, but having realized that, I will not continue it.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Handmaid for Jesus

You can't steal my joy
Supporter
Dec 19, 2010
25,582
32,974
enroute
✟1,395,817.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
If you wish to discuss these things, start a new thread. I was drawn off into an off topic discussion, but having realized that, I will not continue it.
Thank you. I started this thread because the discussion of the OP was taking another thread off topic.
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,937
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
What you are saying is that like John called "come up here" in Revelation Iraneuas also "saw" the last half of the week from that viewpoint/perspective?

I think it would be more accurate to say that the doctrine of Irenaeus does not have any apparent contradictions, when viewed from a Dispensational perspective. But when viewed fro -m any other perspective, his comments seem contradictory. And as I saw a great amount of Dispensationalism explicitly taught in the writings of Irenaeus, It seems logical to conclude that he was probably approaching these ideas from a Dispensational mindset.
 
Upvote 0

Brian Mcnamee

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2017
2,308
1,294
64
usa
✟213,965.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
But Irenaeus also taught the main elements of Covenant Theology. This may seem confusing to modern minds. But we need to remember that this was well over a thousand years before either Dispensationalism or Covenant Theology were reduced to a formal system of doctrine. For Covenant Theology was first reduced to a formal doctrine in the 1500s, and Dispensationalism several hundred years later.

So Irenaeus also said:

“Then, too, Isaiah himself has plainly declared that there shall be joy of this nature at the resurrection of the just, when he says: ‘The dead shall rise again; those, too, who are in the tombs shall arise, and those who are in the earth shall rejoice. For the dew from Thee is health to them.’ And this again Ezekiel also says: ‘Behold, I will open your tombs, and will bring you forth out of your graves; when I will draw my people from the sepulchres, and I will put breath in you, and ye shall live; and I will place you on your own land, and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’ And again the same speaks thus: ‘These things saith the Lord, I will gather Israel from all nations whither they have been driven, and I shall be sanctified in them in the sight of the sons of the nations: and they shall dwell in their own land, which I gave to my servant Jacob. And they shall dwell in it in peace; and they shall build houses, and plant vineyards, and dwell in hope, when I shall cause judgment to fall among all who have dishonoured them, among those who encircle them round about; and they shall know that I am the Lord their God, and the God of their fathers.’ Now I have shown a short time ago that the church is the seed of Abraham; and for this reason, that we may know that He who in the New Testament ‘raises up from the stones children unto Abraham,’ is He who will gather, according to the Old Testament, those that shall be saved from all the nations, Jeremiah says: ‘Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that they shall no more say, The Lord liveth, who led the children of Israel from the north, and from every region whither they had been driven; He will restore them to their own land which He gave to their fathers.’”(Against Heresies, book V, chapter XXXIV, section 1.)

Thus we see that Irenaeus said that the seed of Abraham is the Church, and through that concept he applied the Old Testament prophecies about the return of Israel to the church. This, again, is an element of Covenant Theology and is wholly incompatible with Dispensationalism.

So it would be a serious mistake for anyone to try to assign Irenaeus, or any other ancient writer, to any particular modern system of interpretation, other than that all the early Christian commentators were solid futurists.

This can be seen in a comment penned by Jerome in the fifth century. He said, concerning Daniel 7, "We should therefore concur with the traditional interpretation of all the commentators of the Christian Church, that at the end of the world, when the Roman Empire is to be destroyed, there shall be ten kings who will partition the Roman world amongst themselves. Then an insignificant eleventh king will arise, who will overcome three of the ten kings... Then after they have been slain, the seven other kings will bow their necks to the victor." (Jerome’s comments on Daniel 7:8, as found in “Jerome’s Commentary on Daniel,” pg. 77, translated by Gleason L. Archer, Jr., published by Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, 1958.)
if the church is now Israel explain your view of Psalm 105 how can this be the church?
He is the LORD our God;
His judgments are in all the earth.
8 He remembers His covenant forever,
The word which He commanded, for a thousand generations,
9 The covenant which He made with Abraham,
And His oath to Isaac,
10 And confirmed it to Jacob for a statute,
To Israel as an everlasting covenant,
11 Saying, “To you I will give the land of Canaan
As the allotment of your inheritance,”

God confirmed the covenant with the land placing no restriction on Abraham. God alone passed through and consumed with fire the offering Abraham had made. God made another promise that in Abraham's seed all the nations of the world would be blessed. The genealogy went from Eve with the promise the seed of the woman would crush the head of the serpent. Then this promise is given to Abraham and followed all the way to David who was promised his son would sit forever on the throne. This is followed to Christ. God is keeping both of these covenants. Jer promised a new covenant for the removal of sin not according to the one God made with Moses in the wilderness. The covenant with Abraham still stands regarding the land. The throne of David is an earthly throne and Jesus will hold it for 1000 years. His kingdom will have no end but this earth will burn up with fervent heat at the end of the age.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: miknik5
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,563
2,480
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟290,794.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
God confirmed the covenant with the land placing no restriction on Abraham. God alone passed through and consumed with fire the offering Abraham had made. God made another promise that in Abraham's seed all the nations of the world would be blessed. The genealogy went from Eve with the promise the seed of the woman would crush the head of the serpent.
As faithful Christians we ARE the seed of Abraham. Galatians 3:26 If you belong to Christ, you are the issue of Abraham and the heirs by virtue of the Promise.
This is the plain truth: Every born again Christian IS an Israelite of God, there is NO ethnic divisions in God's sight. Ephesians 2:11-18
People only persist with the nonsense of a separate 'Israel' and 'Church', in order to support the false 'rapture to heaven' theory.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: miknik5
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.