- Aug 21, 2003
- 28,578
- 6,064
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Funny that you should speak disdainfully about the historical sources I quoted yet rely on 20th century scholars. Which translations do you think are more reliable Hebrew scriptures translated by native Hebrew speaking Jewish scholars in the 225 BC LXX, pre-Christian era Targums and the 1917 Jewish Publication Society OT which I have quoted or 20th century scholars who provide no historical evidendence in support of their opinions?Shalom Der Alter, this is a real good post for someone who likes to follow after all of these "authorities."
A scholars opinion without supporting data is no more cogent than yours or mine.Their consensus was that the most reasonable explanation is that the 1st day of ULB was considered to be a Sabbath. I know, you always state that there is NO SCRIPTURE which "word for word" calls these days of "holy convocation" and these days of "rest" SABBATHS. So if you are not in agreement with them, what else is there for me to say? Blessings in The Name, ImAHebrew.
Upvote
0