Why do Christians have trouble with accepting Evolution?

[Archivist]

So a parable can in no way be based on real events then?

It can be we don't know that it was.

 

[keltoi]

It can be we don't know that it was.

Why then are you saying the Samaritan wasn't real person? Do you normally post things that you don't know about?

 

[prodromos]

So you believe that bats are birds?

"Birds" is a lazy translation. Unfortunately that hasn't stopped every subsequent translation from following its lead.

 

[Extraneous]

I've already explained that--the two accounts don't match. That does not bother me because I see them as allegories.

You haven't explained your understanding of what these allegories mean, that's what i'm asking you. I wouldn't bother you with this question but you seem to be adding evolution theory into the bible, and also discounting genealogy as well which is unwise altogether. So if you wish to promote such things, then at least give us your understanding of what these allegories mean. Expound on them further, please.

 

[Extraneous]

And as I have said you are free to your own interpretations. if you want to accept them as actual historical accounts and that works for you, fine.

You don't seem to have an interpretation, but only bare assertions that you cant expound on

 

[Archivist]

You haven't explained your understanding of what these allegories mean, that's what i'm asking you. I wouldn't bother you with this question but you seem to be adding evolution theory into the bible, and also discounting genealogy as well which is unwise altogether. So if you wish to promote such things, then at least give us your understanding of what these allegories mean. Expound on them further, please.

I've said it many times--they mean that God created everything.

 

[Archivist]

You don't seem to have an interpretation, but only bare assertions that you cant expound on

I've expounded on them over and over.

 

[BornAgainChristian1]

Sometimes you can't even prove it to the saved.

What is the "it " you're referring to?

 

[Extraneous]

I've said it many times--they mean that God created everything.

No sir, that is not an explanation. The posters you are disagreeing with would say that as well, and you say they are wrong. So that wont fly. So please, expound on your interpretation with substance, rather than bare assertion.

 

[LaSorcia]

Why do atheists have trouble accepting creationism? I have met many Christians who can accept that God made it all, and evolution was the method, but I have never met an atheist who accepts both as well.

 

[Extraneous]

I've expounded on them over and over.

No you have not. Be honest now. Please teach us what you think these allegories mean, give us some detail.

 

[BornAgainChristian1]

Yes, the genealogy seems hard to ignore. If we say its false then we would need to say the same about Abraham, David and Moses. Critics of the bible would then use it to discount the scriptures.

Yes it's a problem when scripture blatantly contradicts the pagan religion of "evolution".

 

[BornAgainChristian1]

Why do atheists have trouble accepting creationism? I have met many Christians who can accept that God made it all, and evolution was the method, but I have never met an atheist who accepts both as well.

To be honest it is impossible for a Christian to believe in the pagan religion of "evolution" and then call themselves Christians while calling God a liar.

 

[Archivist]

No sir, that is not an explanation. The posters you are disagreeing with would say that as well, and you say they are wrong. So that wont fly. So please, expound on your interpretation with substance, rather than bare assertion.

But that is my explanation. Why do you have such a problem with it?

 

[Extraneous]

Yes it's a problem when scripture blatantly contradicts the pagan religion of "evolution".

Whats worse is how Christians would discount the genealogy in scripture, only so they can believe in ToE. I believe ToE is not good science anyway. I believe its like a religion to scientists. They want to believe they are discovering things but they are only adding fallacy to fallacy. Its the way of mankind. Man is very fallible.

 

[keltoi]

What is the "it " you're referring to?

What was the topic of the post you made that I replied to?

 

[Extraneous]

But that is my explanation. Why do you have such a problem with it?

Because you are trying to add evolution theory into the bible which is mans wisdom, that God has made foolish, and you are trying to discount the genealogy which would discount David, Abraham and Moses, and arm Atheists with ammo to blaspheme the bible even more. So, would ask for more than a bare assertion on your part

 

[GeorgiaGuyinAtlanta]

I think i know some key ideas. Its because it undermines the creation story and that people will become irreligious?

Well wouldnt that be an issue about the idea of the earth is flat if the bible is literal on that part i mean?

What i mean is that science explains our physicial world. The main point i am making is that Creation Story had two interpretations in medieval ages. Allegory" basically a deeper meaning than it is. Or "Literally" like just like it is written.

So basically allegory seems to be the key point then. Since that can be used. Since God is outside our understanding. Science is a method just to understand the world we live in more or less.

So i dont see the problem with evolution, because it doesnt undermine the scripture in the sense of it not being true?

Although i do believe its a shame that more people who lack understanding go away because of ignorance and just dont bother trying to understand why Christianity is a religion to help your life.

But i am curious to what you think?

Research it. Evolution has zero scientific backing. I don't have the time or energy to do the research for you.

I will say, however, that evolution conflicts with the Bible and there is no way to get around it.

By the way, the Earth IS flat, as indicated in the Bible, and as noted by high altitude balloons, measurement, trigonometry, etc.

 

[BornAgainChristian1]

What was the topic of the post you made that I replied to?

Sorry I asked and honest question.

 

[keltoi]

Sorry I asked and honest question.

you said

I agree you can't prove the bible to the unsaved that lack the Holy Spirit.

so obviously the topic of your post is the Bible.