- Jun 22, 2015
- 2,454
- 1,327
- 56
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
I should have been suspended for life, I loved the girls
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Here's more. http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2015/10/06/st-gabriels-suspension-upheld/73481764/
Asians do have a different culture to non-Asians. Perhaps she was more intimidated than a non-Asian would have been. I don't know.
Link
The boys may very well have been "just playing" but the girl apparently didn't see it that way. Perhaps they didn't realize she would feel intimidated being cornered by two boys; they may not have seen it as cornering even. Now either they'll take into consideration the other person's perspective or they'll be bitter and angry and entitled.
A one day suspension really isn't that big of a deal especially at age 12.
Once upon a time the children in this case would have gotten sent to the principals office, maybe gotten the cane once or twice, maybe been given a detention and been returned to class. Now in the age of kids rights and helicopter parenting, kids are suspended, miss out on school and it all ends up in a court case.
Ahhh progress.
Slight flaw in your analysis - this isn't bullying though.
And more generally, scarcely the first time a female claims to be intimidated over virtually nothing.
If he and the other boy, who was also suspended, had just been staring it would have not been so intimidating, but that is not what they were doing.I'm not defending anyone, but if you read carefully the boy's letter of apology, he did say that he would not try to intimidate anyone again. Isn't that an admission of guilt?
Also, perhaps the school is trying to send the message that any kind of purposeful intimidation is wrong.
You can't blame them for that.
Again, I'd like to know more details of exactly what happened, as far as his motivation for his "staring".
If he and the other boy, who was also suspended, had just been staring it would have not been so intimidating, but that is not what they were doing.
"According to court documents: “He walked up to her, said nothing, just stared at her… (She) backed away, and he continued toward her, continuing to stare, continuing not to say anything.” The second boy then “picked up where” the initial encounter “had left off.”"
If it had been my son he would have done more than write an apology. He would have been punished at home. Let's face it, one day vacation from school isn't a punishment.
True. Often enough those policies lead to zero common sense.Another example of why zero tolerance policies are ridiculous.
While I generally agree with you in this area, having been through this similar experience myself, I can nearly guarantee you that SHE didn't think it was "virtually nothing". Remember, she's 12. We're not 12, and we see things through a different lens.
But as I read this story, it brought back the memories of when it happened to me, and they were not pleasant even being 42 and realizing that the boys didn't mean to be that way. There's just no good reason to do this to someone.
And "not saying anything". She had no idea why or what his intentions were. That is intimidating in itself.Yeah, I think the whole "he continued toward her, continuing to stare" is what got me as well.
It's a good lesson at any age to teach people that just because you feel scared of something doesn't mean you're actually at risk. The opportunity was missed here.
Her reaction is more entitled princess-and-the-pea nonsense (oooh "stared at" in a staring game both were taking part in, how "intimidating") - and people have no time for it because if the tables were flipped and the guy was feeling intimidated by the girl, no-one would be calling for the girl to be suspended.
If someone did this to you outside in the real world, and by "this" I mean they stare at you, don't say anything, and then advance on you...what would you do?
True. Often enough those policies lead to zero common sense.
Once upon a time the children in this case would have gotten sent to the principals office, maybe gotten the cane once or twice, maybe been given a detention and been returned to class. Now in the age of kids rights and helicopter parenting, kids are suspended, miss out on school and it all ends up in a court case.
Ahhh progress.
I was suspended in 7th grade (I know, amazing.) because I told a girl to be quiet during a science test (where the teacher had said he would fail the whole class if anyone was caught talking) and she went and got her 8th grade buddies and jumped me after 7th hour. One girl took my glasses, another took my books, and then this girl grabbed my hair (which was funny considering I have short hair) and then tried to girl fight me. I was a bit stunned, but then cold-cocked her.
If someone I was already friends/work acquaintances with that I'd been playing a staring game with for some time already did it, you mean? Not much. Probably troll them back.
(If I sound bitter, it's in part because I went through something like this at primary school. It was more antipathic than a game - think "glaring contest" rather than staring contest - but the girl complained to teacher and guess who got in trouble. Even though she'd been doing the exact same thing to me as I was to her. Yes, damselling is a habit that begins early in some girls, and plenty of adults reinforce that behaviour.)
I got jumped that way in the eighth grade. The fire alarm went off at the school and while we were waiting for the all clear bell I went over and talked to my favorite teacher, Mr. Hagwood. When the bell sounded Mr. Hagwood went up to a girl and asked her if she was ready to go. She went straight to the principal's office thinking I had ratted on her for pulling the alarm. I thought it was just a regular fire drill! Anyhow, she and her friends all jumped me after school. I've never been good at fighting, but when I doubled over from being punched in the stomach the smallest girl in the class came by, dropped her books and single-handedly chased them them all the way. To this day this little girl is the only person from the eighth grade whose name I can remember. She went home and told her mother and the bullying finally stopped.
Personally I'm glad to see schools now take bullying more seriously.
I'm not so sure. There are some pretty intimidating girls especially at that age and it was two to one....if the tables were flipped and the guy was feeling intimidated by the girl, no-one would be calling for the girl to be suspended.
I am, too. My parents weren't really sure what to do about it, because they saw it as part of "growing up", but they did get increasingly worried when I just plum refused to go to school.
I used to get headaches with buzzing in my ears. My mother shuffled me from one doctor to another. The teacher finally pointed out to her that these headaches mostly occurred on Monday mornings. Mind you, they were quite real. If I think too much about those years my ears can still start buzzing.
So we are better informed than school administrators?Slight flaw in your analysis - this isn't bullying though.
And more generally, scarcely the first time a female claims to be intimidated over virtually nothing.
The school might have made a really dumb call, they might have slightly over reacted, they might have acted pretty reasonably. In cases like this, I personally give the school the benefit of a doubt unless there's more information presented.No, just that not every assertion of intimidation or bullying is so. Nothing to say they haven't made a dumb call here.