http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-34192447
Here we go...
A missing link? Or just another ape?
Here we go...
A missing link? Or just another ape?
Also, the idea of "missing link" is misleading and rather meaningless imo.
Sale now onI was just being flippant .
Speculative I know, but the bit about the ritualistic burials is interesting considering the remains could be 3 million sold.
I was just being flippant .
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-34192447
Here we go...
A missing link? Or just another ape?
Neither.A missing link? Or just another ape?
Neither.
A human being.
One who probably had one of God's bone-altering "wonderful plagues" put on them.
Deuteronomy 28:59 Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance.
If you read the 38th Psalm, you'll see David died of such a disease.
Note particularly verse six ...
Psalm 38:6a I am troubled; I am bowed down greatly;
Grave robbers find these bones, then apply them to our ancestorship.
Luke 24:5 And as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth, they said unto them, Why seek ye the living among the dead?
Neither.
A human being.
One who probably had one of God's bone-altering "wonderful plagues" put on them.
Deuteronomy 28:59 Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance.
If you read the 38th Psalm, you'll see David died of such a disease.
Note particularly verse six ...
Psalm 38:6a I am troubled; I am bowed down greatly;
Grave robbers find these bones, then apply them to our ancestorship.
Luke 24:5 And as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth, they said unto them, Why seek ye the living among the dead?
Neither.
A human being.
One who probably had one of God's bone-altering "wonderful plagues" put on them.
Deuteronomy 28:59 Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance.
Only because you're taught that we're apes anyway.Except that the fossils found show both human and "ape" like features.
It doesn't.Where does the Bible state that australopithecines were humans cursed with a disease?
The Bible wasn't written using the science of Linnaeus.Loudmouth said:Or is this yet another claim you are adding to the Bible?
Yup -- right down to the color of the eyes.My former biology teacher Tweeted about this discovery this morning! It's fantastically exciting. I read the National Geographic article she shared:
Only because you're taught that we're apes anyway.
Whether we are healthy, or whether we were hit with one of God's plagues, we're apes.
And Solomon disagrees ...
Ecclesiastes 7:29 Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions.
Evolution is an invention, not a discovery.
Yes, and just wait until the False Scientist shows up in the Tribulation period.Of course that is what is taught because that is what has been demonstrated to be true.
I agree.JonFromMinnesota said:Humans are apart of the Hominidae family, also known as 'the great apes'.
That's nice.JonFromMinnesota said:This includes orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees and humans.
Do you know what ontological reduction is? or are you more interested in your family album?JonFromMinnesota said:Those are our closest cousins which is demonstrated in DNA and human chromosome #2.
No.JonFromMinnesota said:The human species has been around for about 200,000 years with our ancestors living about 6 million years ago.
Solomon, a king-scientist, had apes imported ... probably for study.JonFromMinnesota said:So if you're looking in the bible, which is said to be 6,000 years old, of course men writing this are going to conclude God made them upright.
Yes, it is.JonFromMinnesota said:Evolution is not an invention.
Is this the same source of evidence that says Matthew didn't write the book of Matthew?JonFromMinnesota said:It is a theory with an overwhelming amount of evidence that explains the origin of species.
Observations, repeatable tests, and predictions gave us Thalidomide too, didn't they?JonFromMinnesota said:That evidence being verifiable through observations, repeatable tests, and predictions.
That's because science is myopic.JonFromMinnesota said:Science does not explain the supernatural and only the natural world.
Yes, and please don't forget that.JonFromMinnesota said:Your bible is unfalsifiable and therefore not science.
Welcome to the world of faith, my friend.JonFromMinnesota said:Only a claim.
Evolution will not be falsified in this dispensation.JonFromMinnesota said:If you want to falsify the theory of evolution, you will have to present verifiable evidence that contradicts it.
It doesn't.
The Bible wasn't written using the science of Linnaeus.