You could say that bananas point to God, and it would not matter either.
From what I have observed in these forums, there is nothing that cannot be made to appear "cohesive" with the god of the Bible.
It comes down to how each view of the world in our cases most reliably explain and remain cohesive in the explanation of the reality we find ourselves in. With any worldview we have to look objectively within it to determine if it overall fits with reality. One piece of evidence that I have that you don't is God Himself.
Alleged design, You have yet to establish actual design.
Again, is actual design more cohesive with the reality we find ourselves in or do we have to put it off as an illusion? If there is something we recognize as appearing to be designed then we know what design looks like and the universe looks that way. Now this "appearance" is not due to a visual pattern or a pattern of any type it is the tested measured parameters of the universe.
Untestable and and unfalsifiable assertion. Why do you bother?
We know that intelligent beings give rise to intelligent beings and that is testable and it can be shown false if we can show intelligence arising from non-intelligent matter. On earth we only see intelligence begetting intelligence. It is more cohesive for our intelligence and reason being a product of an intelligent being rather than a process that is mindless, undirected and without any goals. Evolution alone does not explain intelligence arising from non-intelligent material. It does not explain how consciousness arising from mindless materials.
If you are more comfortable with a non-cohesive view of the world that is fine. Just understand that if you feel our intelligence and reason are products of a mindless process there is no reason to believe that reason is actual.
The argument from popularity is fallacious. Not one of you can show that your experience is not imagined.
What it shows is millions of people share common experience within the Christian worldview which reflects the reality we see in our universe.
I find it more satisfying to know that when I use my intelligence and reason it is accurate and actual intelligence and reason I am using rather that chemical reactions firing in the only way they can.
If you are continually unable to substantiate your claims, probability that they are false does increase greatly.
There is strong substantiation for the fine tuning in the genetic code and the universe as a whole. The fact that atheists and other such as you who share a view that the world is Godless must deny reason, intelligence, and design.
How circular. You use your belief that you know that a god exists to support your presupposition that a god exists.
1. You must assume that my knowing God is my imagination, yet you have no way to make that claim and show it is factual.
2. You use your presupposition that God doesn't exist to claim He doesn't exist.
I am sure that I do not accept circular logic as justification. YMMV.
If you view the world by evolution then you do.
That the political will and money exists to bring into existence a country that resembles that mentioned in your Bible makes the creation of Israel as useful as a prophecy fulfilment as me ordering a steak at a restaurant. Now, if the money and the will did not exist, and it still happened, then you might have something.
Are you claiming that the Jewish people and the nation of Israel is not those generations coming from the Biblical Jews?
So Israel has it wrong, as they are not christians. Should they not be Christian?
In the future they will accept Christian as their Messiah.
You know better than them, do you?
We have the original Hebrew test.
That the constants are constant is not in dispute. It is your perception of design that is in question here.
That the constants are constant is not the issue. I don't perceive the design. After testing and measurements it has come to show that fine tuning of those parameters allow life to exist on earth. We recognize what design "looks" like in that each parameter a great number of them must be as they are for life to exist and it appears it was planned that way. It show planning, direction and purpose.
It is you asserting your opinions as truth.
You are not asserting your opinion as truth?
You cannot show that our "will" is "free".
It is self evident. Except by you and others that like to claim it is an illusion.
After all these years here, and your opinions about design still do not get traction, you don't wonder why?
We discuss these things with people like you who deny reality.
Sure it does. It is a character in a book.
You have a rude awakening coming.
Then shoulder that burden of evidence, or admit you cannot.
There are many things in life that can't be shown conclusively.