The Climate Scare Problem

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟156,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Environmental activists who acquired climatology training have produced a global problem: impending catastrophic climate change harm.

Many groups with influence and power followed the promotion of pending Climate Disasters for purpose of gain. Governing bodies of all types are now in the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming arena, with purpose and agenda for gain.

The result is a "Climate Change Mess" the world needs to face and resolve.

Foundational or fundamental to the rise of the Climate Change Mess brought upon the public, the masses, has been the promotion and production of fear of Climate Disasters to Come. Climate Disaster Fear has been promoted to great exaggeration.

The result - mankind now has a Climate Scare Problem. And this problem needs to be resolved.

But how will the Climate Scare be resolved?

.
 

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟156,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
First admit to the Climate Scare.

Or else this quoted professor is a prophet.


Megadrought may plague parts of USA

Doyle Rice, USA TODAY


We ain't seen nothing yet: The intense drought in California is only an appetizer compared with what's coming this century across much of the western and central USA, according to a study out Thursday.

During the years 2050 to 2100, the Southwest and Great Plains will face a persistent "megadrought" worse than anything seen in the past 1,000 years, and the dry conditions will be "driven primarily" by human-induced global warming, scientists said.
There's at least an 80% chance of a megadrought in these regions if climate change continues unabated, Toby Ault, an atmospheric scientist at Cornell University and co-author of the research, said at a news conference Thursday in San Jose.

Megadrought may plague parts of USA

.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,850,672
51,419
Guam
✟4,896,791.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
But how will the Climate Scare be resolved?

By considering the source.

The term used for what scientists do now is called crisis management, where scientists come up with a global scare, then, at the peak of public frenzy, come to our rescue.

In some cases they can, in others they can't.

Such as the syzygy of August 1987 that was supposed to tear our planet apart.

Overpopulation, depletion of resources, the Harmonic Convergence, Y2K, oil fields of Kuwait set on fire (which is exactly what was done, and despite the prediction of scientists, nothing happened), and now global warming are all examples, IMO, of crisis management.

It makes scientists look like heroes, when in fact, all they are are paper heroes.

The flip side is when something real happens, and scientists downplay it.

Such as L'Aquila.

Where were the scientists when Haiti was crippled by an earthquake?

Where were the scientists when Indonesia was crippled by a tsunami?

I'll tell you where they were.

They were everywhere but in Haiti and Indonesia.

Monte Carlo is much more fun to do research.
 
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟156,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Clear awareness AV!

There are two sides to crisis management; one is where a group such as a government agency does not release what is really happening, such as Bird Flu early stage spreading uncertainty, to try and prevent public panic and hysteria.

But such is not so with the supposed catastrophic AGW. It is clearly what you stated: induced with manipulative purpose by many individuals and organizations.

Stating Tropical Storm Sandy was induced by ~150 ppm additional CO2 in the atmosphere was scraping the barrel. And now the sequential snow storms in the U.S. Northeast. They have to use what they can to "verify" the non-existing crisis.
 
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟156,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Here we have the real reason why you reject simple facts. You are scared of them.

How are we going to deal with the promotion of fear upon the masses from what others are stating about earth's future climate?

CAGW promoters started it. Now how does the science community deal with it? Another "Hockey Stick" publication for the followers to promote?
 
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟156,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
When will "people" find out there is no Catastrophic AGW problem?

Many are listing their experience in learning!


Rud Istvan on February 15, 2015 at 2:41 pm

I hold a BA summa in economics/econometrics, JD, and MBA, all from Harvard. I am sole or co-inventor of 14 issued US patents concerning RFID (Motorola), wireless patient monitoring (Motorola), topical antiseptics (my main company) and energy storage carbons (my second company). One peer reviewed paper applying nonlinear dynamics to manufacturing. Spent my career in business: consulting, large public corporation, small private corporations. Now winding down.

Until 2011, I thought the IPCC knew what it was doing, but that UNFCC would have a difficult time getting international action on the resulting ‘commons’ problem until problems were much worse. Copenhagen. (The ‘problem of the commons’ describes why there are no rational voluntary solutions to externalities like atmospheric CO2.) So naïve, I was unaware of Climategate.

From 2008-2010 researched market potential for energy storage carbons, to evaluate whether commercialization was warranted. After presenting findings at an international conference, several participants from academia and government asked if I would write them up more formally. Started out as a petroleum oriented energy policy paper. The future of hybrid vehicles depends on fuel saving economics, which depends on fuel prices, which depends on global oil supply and demand. Thus began a three-year journey culminating in the publication of Gaia’s Limits. It covered food and water as well as energy, since future global energy demand (and emissions) depends on population and economic development in places like China and India (as COP21 is rediscovering).

Researching climate change impacts on future food production (for what became that ebook) was my rather abrupt conversion to deep climate skepticism, albeit lukewarm. I found a 2011 Congressional briefing on CAGW food impacts by 2060. It came from the National Research Council, and was worse than grim—projecting billions would die of starvation if AGW is not mitigated. (A 60% reduction in crop yields in the US, India, and Africa would be catastrophic.) It was also deliberately misleading. It misrepresented NSF’s cherry pick of the worst outcome IPCC heat stress papers, all models. The IPCC US corn and soybean scare was based on a single paper’s statistical model. Which used unbelievably poor econometrics. I could not fathom how the authors made such obvious mistakes, nor how it got through peer review. That was my aha! moment. Led to my first guest post on it at Climate Etc 3/22/12. It also led to major portions of my two more recent books, different responses to that aha!

I regularly scan CE, Climate Audit, WUWT, JoNova, BishopHill, GWPF, and Paul Homewood. Just discovered Paul Matthews. Less regularly Pielke Jr., Tol, and Steele. Sometimes a thread leads to places like SoD. Occasionally check RealClimate to see what the consensus is saying.


Denizens II | Climate Etc.

.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟960,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Here we have the real reason why you reject simple facts. You are scared of them.

I'm afraid of what would happen if I give more credibility, authority, and money, to these knuckleheads. I have some answers but no one is interested in them, therefore I took my ball and went home long ago. :D
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟960,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
.

But how will the Climate Scare be resolved?

I don't think many people are actually scared, not enough to do anything about it anyway. It's even pretty obvious that scientists aren't too concerned either. If you're going to shout fire, you'd better be grabbing a bucket.
 
Upvote 0