PsychoSarah
Chaotic Neutral
It was. But they were all guided by one God over the span of thousands of years to tell the same story.
I'd give Genesis a minimum of 2 authors, probably far more than that.
Upvote
0
It was. But they were all guided by one God over the span of thousands of years to tell the same story.
Sure, I can infer that it is written by more than one person pretty quickly.
If love is not real, how can it be told or shown? Words and actions are not love. Anyone can talk and act without love.
Love is figment of human imagination. It's not real I'm afraid. Unless you can prove it is. Do you have evidence that love exists?
"Keep in mind that Moses edited Genesis from 10 eyewitness accounts. The accounts were probably written on clay tablets. Noah would have taken these tablets on the ark with him. "
" Adam actually wrote part of Genesis. 10 different times in the book of Genesis you will find the phrase these are the generations of. This is the switching phrase where a new author is now taking over. Apparently God wrote the first chapter. There is no way anyone else would have known those things. But for chapter 2 Adam was there and was an eyewitness to what was happening. Adam wrote chapters 2, 3, and 4."
Who Wrote the Book of Genesis?
It seems legitimate, I am not 100% percent convinced but it it an interesting observation.
There is no reason to think Moses wrote a single word in the bible.
Well, it wasn't decided by one person. Scores of people over thousands of years have come to the same conclusion.
That would be one good reason.
If you claim to be a scholar of the Bible and have studied it for a year or so, then your "Moses not author" opinion is worth consideration. Then we would ask for your list of reasons to think previous teams of scholars would be wrong.
Moses, as I stated, wouldn't have been literate in Hebrew. He was raised as an Egyptian, they wouldn't have been literate in the language of their slaves.
It's even possible he didn't speak Hebrew, which makes the presence of Aaron, who often spoke on behalf of Moses, who is stated as having issues with speaking (potentially he didn't speak Hebrew very well or knew only a few words even later in life) and why people were so willing to follow Aaron (because from their perspective he lead them more than Moses). Since there are no versions of the bible per that time period written in Egyptian hieroglyphics, it stands to reason that Moses never personally wrote anything in the bible nor edited it.
That's just so weird that you can see that well into the past. Amazing.
Try it on me....I alive, live in Milwaukee, born in Indiana, my mom was a nurse, my dad a union construction worker......OK...ready?
How many languages do I know and what are they?
(Wisconsin State Fair starts next week. You should be there in a booth.)
The oldest scrolls of the Torah are from 1100 to 1200 and they are all on sheepskin.
"It stands to reason" that sheepskin scrolls 2000 years older would be in poor shape and quite rare to begin with.
One original copy and a handful of duplicates.
If you mean human authors, I agree.I'd give Genesis a minimum of 2 authors, probably far more than that.
If you mean human authors, I agree.
Adam = Genesis 1 & 2
Seth = Genesis 3 - 5
Noah = Genesis 6 - 9
Shem = Genesis 10 & 11
Abraham = Genesis 12 - 25
Isaac, Jacob, Joseph = Genesis 26 -50
Then Moses translated those writings into Hebrew.
That's a weak argument, Sarah.There is no reason to think Moses wrote a single word in the bible. At best you might be able to try to argue that Aaron did ghost writing for him. After all Moses was raised as an Egyptian, not as a Hebrew, if he was literate he would have been literate in Egyptian hieroglyphics, not Hebrew, the language of the slaves (supposedly).
He may not have been -- but he didn't need to be.again, based in how the bible depicts Moses as being raised, he shouldn't have been literate in Hebrew himself.
He may not have been -- but he didn't need to be.
As I said, Sarah, the claim that Moses should not have been able to write Hebrew is a weak one.if god was willing to make Moses literate in Hebrew, why didn't god just make the bible written in a language anyone could read, even if they were illiterate?
As I said, Sarah, the claim that Moses should not have been able to write Hebrew is a weak one.
Who's more surprised, in your estimation? you or I?The claim you make about why makes 0 sense
Who's more surprised, in your estimation? you or I?
Moses, as I stated, wouldn't have been literate in Hebrew. He was raised as an Egyptian, they wouldn't have been literate in the language of their slaves. It's even possible he didn't speak Hebrew, which makes the presence of Aaron, who often spoke on behalf of Moses, who is stated as having issues with speaking (potentially he didn't speak Hebrew very well or knew only a few words even later in life) and why people were so willing to follow Aaron (because from their perspective he lead them more than Moses). Since there are no versions of the bible per that time period written in Egyptian hieroglyphics, it stands to reason that Moses never personally wrote anything in the bible nor edited it.
Moses spoke hebrew:There is no reason to think Moses wrote a single word in the bible. At best you might be able to try to argue that Aaron did ghost writing for him. After all Moses was raised as an Egyptian, not as a Hebrew, if he was literate he would have been literate in Egyptian hieroglyphics, not Hebrew, the language of the slaves (supposedly).
There is no reason to think Moses wrote a single word in the bible. At best you might be able to try to argue that Aaron did ghost writing for him. After all Moses was raised as an Egyptian, not as a Hebrew, if he was literate he would have been literate in Egyptian hieroglyphics, not Hebrew, the language of the slaves (supposedly).