S
Sectio Aurea
Guest
That's what I expected you to say.
Then you obviously know my claim is correct.
Hence my post 51.
Dissecting post 51 will not produce a contemporary historical document. So I'm not going to waste my time.
Until you show some appreciation of the nature of historical evidence and how that is evaluated I remain utterly sceptical of your basic stance.
John, I have spent many years evaluating the historical evidence, it seem it is you who is ignorant of the facts. If the evidence that I requested existed, I wouldn't need to request it, and you wouldn't be skeptical of my request. I will show you some appreciation when you admit my claim is correct.
You will debunk and disagree with whatever doesn't fit your existing conclusions, rather than engage in genuine debate which requires quality information as I have already indicated.
John, you are projecting your own behaviour on to me here. I asked you for evidence which you have failed to supply despite making claims you have supplied it. Do you really consider that a genuine debate?
John, the facts stand-
There are no contemporary historical documents for Jesus.
Don't go making claims that such documents exist if you can not produce evidence of such documents.
Last edited:
Upvote
0