You're straining. The conditions and situations mentioned were due to them. The Sabbath police, the 'messiah's, the bands of followers in the desert or taking over the temple. You're straining to separate the materials. They don't. They also don't separate from Mt 10.
The thing about Luke is that once you follow the Galilean theme, you realize that Jesus risked a lot by settling in their; he put himself in the mainsteam of zealot thinking and risked his own name by people who associated him with 'them.' The complaint from various passages about jesus being a Galilean is not that they were hick or lower class or just from the country not from Jerusalem; it was that they were trying to foment unrest and revolution. They had to get help from the countryside because Herodians and the temple staff were seen as shills for Rome and precious about their temple and how long it took to build.
Would you like a standard bibliographic materials list?
I don't even know what you are talking about - which makes two of us....
The zealots were revolting against the Romans. That does not make them the abomination of desolation. The abomination of desolation is some
thing that will be setup, in Daniel 12, which Jesus referred to Daniel.
11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate
set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.