not well kept is your opinion. not well kept is more natural.No, I never said her hair was not natural. I said it was not well kept.
Upvote
0
not well kept is your opinion. not well kept is more natural.No, I never said her hair was not natural. I said it was not well kept.
Once upon a time if you had a tattoo people would think poorly of you and not hire you. Now people don't care for the most part. Yeah I cut my hair to find work but after having a job and growing my hair nobody thought less of my work as evidenced by performance based pay rises.Hairstyles, even natural ones can be distracting. In a work enviroment, hair can be distracting or even dangerous, or unhealthy. So I think the schools should consider limitations on hair. Food service, you must wear a hair net. Working around moving machinery, long wild hair could get caught in machinery, many professions would limit hair styles as unprofessional looking or causing customers to go elsewhere. This is why schools should set and enforce dress codes. Establish in children what is expected of them so they can be successful in life.
not well kept is more natural.
You lost your argument and now you're going there?Hmm. Okay. I haven't heard that sentiment since the hippy era, but okay. Is the same true about hygiene?
Girl says Florida school threatening expulsion over her ânatural hairâ | Fox News
First: This is a private school, so they can set almost any limitations they want and can expel a student for any infraction they want.
So, the family says the hair is not a distraction, the school says it is.
From the picture, it appears(pictures can be misleading) that the hair:
is about 6-10 inches above her head, billows over both shoulders on the sides, seems to protrude 8-12 inches behind her. I don't think length would be a problem. So there is a wall that is 2'x4' of wavy hair.
If this isn't distracting what is? At minimum she should have to sit at the back of the class(then the school would be called racist).
I know someone will bring up her ethnicity. She is celebrating her heritage with this hair. Who her ancestors were has no bearing on something being distracting or not.
I believe this hair is a distraction in class.
The Lorain Horizon Science Academy in Ohio is facing heat from the natural hair community after a copy of a letter to parents that included a ban on afro puffs and ‘small twisted braids’ was posted online.
The 2009 incident where a young youth's teacher cut off the youth's braids and threw them away in front of her because the youth was playing with them, is evident of how far out there issues of conformity are taken.
More recently, pulling hair back or braiding hair was banned--until an uproar. ...
Racism is indicated when the demographic of the school shows a preponderance of Anglo students and this beautiful young lady is told she must conform to the Anglo appearance or be expelled.
I don't want to get into the racial or ethnic aspect of this, or whether there is one or not. I am just saying, she should wear her hair anyway she wants, nobody else's business. Enough said.
From the linked article: ***UPDATE: Just received word that the school has lifted the ban. Here is the letter they issued today:
Per the 2009 incident described at the start of this post, had that been my child I'd have had that teacher arrested for assault on my child. And I would have sued her personally, as well as the school.
Racists need to be taught they shall not be tolerated. Violent racists need their backside beat in court. Barring that, in person works too.
I think this is disgusting. Why should you have to chemically treat your hair so it lies flat or blow dry it every day? Her hair looks healthy and really pretty. Perhaps people need to learn how to tolerate simple natural differences. There are different hair types even within black people; some have quite soft hair with not much volume while others have thicker courser and curlier hair. It is not healthy to have straight hair as a standard for everyone.
I don't want to get into the racial or ethnic aspect of this, or whether there is one or not. I am just saying, she should wear her hair anyway she wants, nobody else's business. Enough said.
How students wear their hair is the business of a private school. How they dress, as well. The 1st amendment does not apply to private schools, only government institutions.
That same school explicitly prohibits mohawks, shaved designs, and rat tails, for instance.
No mohawks or rat tails?!? Those are distinctly anglo hairstyles! I doubted it before...but now I KNOW this school is racist!
They're racist against blacks and whites!
I don't think anyone is denying that the school has the right to give her this ultimatum. It's about whether it's unethical or even racist and whether they should be pressured to change their minds.How students wear their hair is the business of a private school. How they dress, as well. The 1st amendment does not apply to private schools, only government institutions.
That same school explicitly prohibits mohawks, shaved designs, and rat tails, for instance.
It's possible for them to get around it if the policy does not mention race explicitly. They didn't say "Afro-textured hair of a certain size or style is not allowed." It's still wrong of them, in my opinion, but I'm not sure you could win a court case against them.A private school can not violate the civil rights of an individual student. They can not commit to racist policies.
How absurd anyone would even suggest such a thing is possible because this particular school is a private institution.